Talk:Roger Bigod of Norfolk

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earl of Norfolk

The article says that he is sometimes counted as Earl of Norfolk, but he probably was never actually created earl and refers to his son Hugh as Hugh Bigod, 1st Earl of Norfolk. Why is Roger Bigod then also listed as 1st Earl of Norfolk? Havard 16:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Four ad half years later I was just thinking the same thing... May be able to work this out though :-) Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are right his son was the First Earl of Norfolk. Pipera (talk) 07:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very confusing and unsatisfactory state of affairs124.185.182.206 (talk) 02:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bigod, "Bigot"

Is his "surname" related to the roots of the word "bigot"? 207.202.227.125 01:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to this:

bigot - 1598, from M.Fr. bigot, from O.Fr., supposedly a derogatory name for Normans, the old theory (not universally accepted) being that it springs from their frequent use of O.E. oath bi God. Plausible, since the Eng. were known as goddamns in Joan of Arc's France, and during World War I Americans serving in France were said to be known as les sommobiches (see also son of a bitch). But the earliest Fr. use of the word (12c.) is as the name of a people apparently in southern Gaul. The earliest Eng. sense is of "religious hypocrite," especially a female one, and may be influenced by beguine. Sense extended 1687 to other than religious opinions.
— The Online Etymology Dictionary, http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bigot

--Havard 21:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has mixed up Rogert Bigot for Roger Bigot and the article has mixed references that need to be cleared up. Pipera (talk) 07:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources ?

What are the sources of this article ? PurpleHz 18:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Working on that. Pipera (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Domesday Book

Both Roger and Robert were rewarded with a substantial estate in East Anglia following the Norman Conquest of England. The Domesday Book of 1086 lists Roger as holding six lordships in Essex, 117 in Suffolk and 187 in Norfolk.

That is incorrect it was man called Roger Bigot ^[1]

^ Name: Roger Bigot https://opendomesday.org/name/roger-bigot

[1] Name: Roger Bigot https://opendomesday.org/name/roger-bigot

[1]

Earl of Norfolk

Bigod, "Bigot"

Sources ?

See also

Domesday Book