This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orphanage — You can help!.OrphanageWikipedia:WikiProject OrphanageTemplate:WikiProject OrphanageOrphanage
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Much of this reads like PR, relying upon the organization's materials Chris Troutman (talk) 14:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
We have revised the article extensively to remove peacock terms and to remove the final section that seemed to boast about Rising Ground's programs. We have addressed other concerns, such as have at least one other article link to the Rising ground article, and updated citations to use non-primary sources. We would like to have the warning template at the top of the article. However, since there is a COI, it should be removed by another party. I hope that you will revisit the article and remove the warning. Thank you. HarrisonEdwards (talk) 19:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[User:HarrisonEdwards][reply]
Hi Chris -- It has been almost a year since Harrison Edwards told you that we have substantially rewritten the history to remove any "PR" tone, and you have not responded. Also, note that much of the material supporting the narrative of this 191-year-old institution has been sourced from primary sources because articles, reports, first-person accounts, etc., cannot be found. I urge you to remove the warning. HarrisonEdwards (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
