Talk:Right to truth

A fact from Right to truth appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the right to truth has been recognized by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Right to truth.

Wikipedia

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy B‑class Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the right to truth "stands somewhere on the threshold of a legal norm and a narrative device"? Source: https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/right-truth-international-law-fact-or-fiction
- ALT1:... that the right to truth has been recognized by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations? Source: https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0020589317000586

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Joel Molina Ramírez

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 15:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Created a little outside the 7-day window, but possibly expanded 5x within that window, and I won't be picky about that. Earwig turns up high probability of violation, but it's just all the long names of international orgs. I think either ALT could work and don't have a strong preference. Regarding ALT0, the author does hedge their quote a tiny bit; the full quote is By way of a tentative conclusion to the question posed in the title of this article, it may be argued that the right to the truth stands somewhere... But that's such a small thing I think we'd still be fine using ALT0 as proposed. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 04:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]