Talk:Rankin/Bass Productions

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking / American

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New York City

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City

New York (state)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)

Media

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Witch's Night Out

Not a Rankin/Bass production! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.97.18.43 (talk) 22:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fanpage

Reads like a fanpage - need cleanup. Davodd 02:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

didn't seem that bad to me. I cleaned up the "rankin/bass today" section, renamed "along came rudolph" section to just "rudolph", and removed the npov and cleanup tags. -- Akb4 19:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think that the Rudolph section should be included with the section about the other holiday specials. I don't see much reason for them to be separate. Caterfree10 (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Coker, Jr.?

No mention of the principal designer for most of the classic Christmas specials? DarkAudit 19:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

production list split

I think it'd be good if the cel animated and stop-motion animated productions were differentiated. -- Akb4 19:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography?

Some of the movie links at the bottom don't actually point to the listed at the bottom don't point to the appropriate pages. "Twas the night before christmas" for example points to the poem instead of to a page about the Rankin/Bass film. There are other examples of this too.

Rankin/Bass logos

I can understand wanting to keep the 1975 Rankin/Bass logo to help in the description of this article, but why remove the other logos (including the 1966 Videocraft logo) when they are just as useful in describing the company's history? Starbuck-2 21:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Showing logos falls under fair use as it is; simply showing a group of logos doesn't qualify. —tregoweth (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps we could at least keep the Videocraft logo to include in the section on Rankin/Bass' origins, then. Starbuck-2 23:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - That would probably be okay; what should be avoided is just a gallery of logos (closing logo fans can get carried away sometimes...) —tregoweth (talk) 02:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - I like a gallery of logos, preferably with motion and sound. Where is the best place to find one? NBK1122 (talk) 12:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rudolph.jpg

Image:Rudolph.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Verify

Is there any proof of this upcoming "Jolly Old Saint Nicholas" Christmas Special or is this a rumor created by a fan? Verification is a high standard on this site, rumors are not.--Ace Darville (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rankin-bass-1969.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Rankin-bass-1969.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The King and I

Did Rankin/Bass Productions co-produced the 1999 animated film with Morgan Creek Productions and Nest Entertainment? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.53.89 (talk) 02:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of That Girl in Wonderland

Who owns the rights to That Girl in Wonderland, DreamWorks Animation/DreamWorks Classics or Warner Bros.? 24.180.56.157 (talk) 22:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Animagic

Do we have an article or section somewhere about this term? I noticed it mentioned on the 1985 The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus (film):

"This was Rankin/Bass's final "Animagic" stop motion animated special produced in Japan. Future specials and series would be traditionally animated from this point on"

I would like to know all the films which are considered 'animagic' and produced in Japan, it would be an interesting list, whether on its own article or to redirect this term to a section here. Ranze (talk) 21:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We still lack an article on Animagic. Apparently it was the company's term for a "special kind of wood-based puppetry". See external link. It reportedly gave their works a "very distinctive visual style".

As far as I know, most of the works from Rankin/Bass Productions were animated in Japan. They outsourced work to Dentsu Motion Pictures, MOM Production, and various other studios. All Animagic specials were animated by Tadahito Mochinaga (1919-1999), a Japanese pioneer in stop-motion animation. Dimadick (talk) 22:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess doing DMP/MOM articles would be a good first step for building info on R/B, do you think Animagic should maybe redirect to a section on Mochinaga's article? Ranze (talk) 18:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Dimadick (talk) 09:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]