Talk:REACH (Singapore)

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 April 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

Where now?

Now that we have had a deletion discussion and decided to keep the article we have to decide what to do with it:

Sourcing: Obviously, we need to rewrite the article using the independent sources found during the AfD and any other good sources anybody can suggest. Please suggest them here.
Focus: Should we focus on REACH as an organisation or as a web site? I think the former. As such we should try to get information about who is in charge and what its status is within the government.
Article name: "REACHSingapore" is obviously the wrong name. That is what made me think the subject was not notable or verifiable. I was searching for the wrong name! Do we want to go for Reaching Everyone For Active Citizenry @ Home, REACH (Singapore government agency) or REACH (website). I am thinking that the second one is probably best with the other two being redirects.
Tone: At the very least we need to try to avoid writing content that sounds like it is promoting the subject. If there is any critical coverage (of a non-trivial and notable nature) we should try to include that. Is there any?

--DanielRigal (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@DanielRigal: I have removed sections which are not referenced and are possibly closely paraphrased from the website. I did try to find sources but other than some trivial mentions, there are hardly any available. I have no objection to reinstating the content but only if citations are found for it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]