Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Singapore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article alerts

[edit]

Did you know

Articles for deletion

  • 02 Jan 2025 – Charlton Media Group (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Eric Schucht (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
  • 02 Jan 2025 – MaNaDr (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by AllyD (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
  • 07 Jan 2025Singaporean 2nd Infantry ambush (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Chipmunkdavis (t · c) was closed as delete by Girth Summit (t · c) on 07 Jan 2025; see discussion (3 participants)

Proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Good article nominees

Featured article reviews

Requests for comments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

Articles for creation

Good article reassessment for Fort Pasir Panjang

[edit]

Fort Pasir Panjang has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Meetup @ 28 Sept 2024

[edit]


Singapore Meetup

Meetup 16

  • Status: Upcoming
  • Date: 28 September 2024, Saturday
  • Time: 1:30 pm
  • Place: Subway @ Singapore Management University

Please indicate your interest on the meetup page.

v  d   e

Potentially discussing on:

– robertsky (talk) 10:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP politics date removals

[edit]

This IP has made a series of unexplained date and wikilink removals, I don't have time to check them but thought worth raising. CMD (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Kelvin Tan

[edit]

Kelvin Tan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Old National Library Building

[edit]

Old National Library Building has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National Day Parade and among others

[edit]

@Robertsky and Z1720: After I seen the Template:Singapore_National_Day_Parade, I was considering on writing or making an article akin to the opening and closing ceremonies of the 2024 Summer Olympics since that there were articles and would be useful for archival purposes, including next year celebrating the 60th anniversary since independence. But there are reviews like no-such articles exist or not necessary. I leave you to decide. Sculture65 (talk) 04:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: Furthermore, I left a topic in the List of major crimes in Singapore_(2020–present)'s talk page and hoping to improve the articles for better clarity and organization itself. Do also let me know. Sculture65 (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review

[edit]

I have nominated Toa Payoh ritual murders for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Denise Phua

[edit]

Denise Phua has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 04:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:LGBTQ topics in Singaporean literature#Requested move 24 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --MikutoH talk! 03:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Central Executive Committee (PAP)#Requested move 5 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Feeglgeef (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Robertsky, Justanothersgwikieditor, and Number 57:, I pinged is that I noted the edits by that particular someone I not gonna name, but that one happened to have edited was somewhat new to the Wikipedia (having joined less than three months ago, I think the person was still new to it), and apparently reverting or reversing some of the edits (including mine) that has some issues, along with the editing methods. I just do not want to engage into conflicts against the users involved, but I also not sure on what I am going to do either and if I will interfere, it will become worse. Need help to discuss that in a proper manner, thank you so much! Sculture65 (talk) 07:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sculture65, If it is a content dispute, try engaging the other editor on the article talk page first. I think it is not proper for me or the rest to step in without knowing specifically which edits you have objections to, and also without knowing how the other editor will respond to an attempt for discussion. There's some advice on how to go about doing at WP:RCD. – robertsky (talk) 09:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@robertsky, I not too experienced on how to resolve disputes, and besides the user was new. I read on the RCD, and just to ask is WP:DRN OK? Sculture65 (talk) 10:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum, I also noted on the user talk page and it seems to be like being harsh at one other who think that he is right and everyone is wrong. I not sure on what can I do besides RCD and DRN. Sculture65 (talk) 11:36, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sculture65 If you look at an existing DRN case, you will realise that first question is "Have you discussed this on a talk page? which the answer is a no. So without this first step, DRN will not do anything about it. Ideally discuss it on the article talkpage instead of a user talkpage to reduce influence and sense of "vandalism" on either personal talkpage. Until that is done, I believed we are unable to make any comments as we will be making assumptions. I noted you are on a break, have a good rest and enjoy the festivities first. ~ JASWE (talk) 05:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is ongoing at Template talk:SMRT infobox colour on whether to keep the new or old format of the infobox station name template that's on top of every MRT article.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Devtools
Interact with your site

This panel displays the activity of Edgio edge and browser caches and prefetching.

78741754-32CA-4E37-B0F8-7A60AB8D4089