Talk:Q20 and Q44 buses

Q20 and Q44 buses has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 18, 2018. (Reviewed version).

New York City: Public Transportation Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

Buses: New York Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Q44 SBS BRT RDT.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Q20 and Q44 buses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.example.com/map.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Q20 and Q44 buses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160304052446/http://web.mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/queens/q020curDom497.pdf to http://web.mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/queens/q020cur.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Q20 and Q44 buses/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 02:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
~~On hold for 7 days (starting January 15/18)~~ Pass!

Does the image associated with the "Incidents" add any value to the article? An image of the actual accident would be much better.
- The only images I could find were not freely licensed. This shows the site and the damage to the building. Sorry. epicgenius (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please update the caption of the image to mention that it shows the damage to the building. I would have never guessed thats what the scaffolding was.--Dom497 (talk) 12:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done. epicgenius (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      - I still don't think its clear that the scaffolding is there because of the crash. Maybe something like: "The scaffolding on the building was put in place as a result of the crash."--Dom497 (talk) 19:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        I clarified it. Is it better now? epicgenius (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        
        Yep! Looks good! --Dom497 (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Traveling west along Archer Avenue, it passes the Jamaica Center station of the Archer Avenue subway and its Bus Terminal." - "Bus Terminal" shouldn't be capitalized.
- Done.
"At the Sutphin Boulevard subway station and Jamaica Long Island Rail Road and Airtrain JFK station..." - One to many "and"'s.
- Done.
"The Q50 meanwhile turns east to follow the Bx5..." - What is Bx5?
- Another bus route, but I reworded anyway. Too many details about the Q50. epicgenius (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Prior to 1999, the Q44 ran entirely local between Jamaica, Queens and West Farms, Bronx, and was the only bus service along Main Street in Queens" - Might just be me but the multiple "and"'s throw off the flow of the sentence.
- Done.
"On February 15, 1932, North Shore Bus Company began operating a bus service to replace the Long Island Rail Road's Whitestone Branch,[5][12][13] labeled "Q35" - Move refs 5, 12, and 13 to the end of the sentence since they are so close to it. (This is more of suggestion and not a requirement).
- I split these up into 2 sentences.
"...this is the routing of the current Q25 bus in the area. It then ran east along 14th Avenue before following the current Q76 and Q15 routes to Whitestone." - Needs a reference.
- Done.
Could the infobox be edited to remove the need of the "Q20B operates weekdays only" note?
- Done.
Refs 5 and 18 don't seem reliable.
- I trusted ref 18 a little more because there is a team of several authors. Anyway, I replaced them both. epicgenius (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would recommend archiving ref 71 (or linking to an already archived version) as it looks like it could become a deadlink in the near future.
- Done. epicgenius (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--Dom497 (talk) 02:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! Passing!--Dom497 (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Q20 and Q44 buses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.mta.info/mta/planning/sbs/Q44SBS.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170918233953/https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20170918/flushing/flushing-bus-crash-northern-main-mta to https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20170918/flushing/flushing-bus-crash-northern-main-mta

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]