This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
A fact from Prosecution of S. Iswaran appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I don't see a BLP issue with the hook. However, I changed the hook from "minister" to "cabinet minister" per the source, so I would like a response to the change from Kingoflettuce before taking this nom further. Gatoclass (talk) 13:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kingoflettuce (talk·contribs), the title of the main prosecution case is PP v S Iswaran, i.e. the case in which the actual criminal charges are brought against the defendant. This is how the case was titled for the trial hearing and is how criminal prosecution cases are generally titled in Singapore. It is generally the prosecuting party v the defendant.
There are a number of related cases that are titled S Iswaran v PP such as [2024] SGHC 123, [2024] SGHC 185, and [2024] SGCA 35, but these are criminal revision applications by the defendant for his charges to be heard together, for disclosure of information, etc. and are not the main case. In these related cases, the defendant is named first because the defendant is the applicant and the prosecution is the respondent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JudiciousGoat (talk • contribs) 12:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]