Talk:Non-subscribing Presbyterian Church of Ireland

Christianity: Reformed Christianity / Unitarian Universalism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Unitarian Universalism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disputed statements

I am moving disputed information here so it can be clarified and a consensus formed before placing it back in the article. The first is the original; the second paragraph added recently:

The ministers of the NSPCI, however, share a common roster with the ministers of the predominantly British General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches (GAUFCC) and NSPCI students study at GAUFCC ministerial colleges.

Not all Non-subscribing Presbyterian Ministers keep a close contact with the Unitarians nor are identified as such. There is no such shared common roster with the ministers of the British General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches and Non-subscribing Presbyterian Ministers and only a few have study at GAUFCC ministerial colleges.

Some items that need to be addressed include:

definitions – common roster or shared common roster is an inside term and needs to be explained or reworded
significance – if this information is essential for the article, explain why
sources – disputed statements beg for sources. For example, who says "NSPCI students study at …" or "only a few have studied…"

✤ JonHarder ^talk 00:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading "Remonstrant" link

I am going to remove the link to "Remonstrant" in the phrase "Remonstrant Synod of Ulster". The link goes to an article about the Dutch Remonstrants, but the Ulster ones are not mentioned there nor were they Dutch. I am not sure whether what is needed is a red link to an article about the Remonstrant Synod of Ulster or a blue link to Remonstrant; I don't know enough about the Ulster synod's theology to know if that would be appropriate. But clearly the current link is misleading and not informative on the (Irish) topic. --Haruo (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent additions of unverified material

Lately i have been reverting a lot of edits by the same account who keeps adding what appears to be origianl research and unverified edits. Namely that there has been a split in the church. He/She has not added any references.

I dont know enough about Wikipedia to know what to do Eleutherius (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]