Talk:Moral responsibility
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Moral responsibility article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
"Lack of sense of responsibility of psychopaths" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lack of sense of responsibility of psychopaths. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 26#Lack of sense of responsibility of psychopaths until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Conversation
[edit]Moral values on responsibility 27.123.138.179 (talk) 08:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Temporal causality
[edit]Though as of yet time travel is firmly in the realms of science fiction, it is a valid concern that eventually or by some freak of nature a method is discovered. In the current political climate the mere existence of a time machine would be a terrible shock and potentially cause upheval in physics as well as economics and sociology due to the ripple effects. Imagine if in 1943 Heisenberg didn't pursue D2O as a moderator, or in 1939 Einstein decided to warn Roosevelt against the construction of an atomic bomb in case the Earth's atmosphere ignited based on a miscalculation. A tiny change could have unpredictable results, even if that change was well meaning and with the best intentions. Should scientists working on such things be careful and only publish once they have established someone else has already discovered the same effect or principle through other means? 91.190.161.160 (talk) 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Usage of "preferential"
[edit]In the paragraph on groups of people who are promoters of personal responsibility, it states that the groups listed are "preferential promoters" of personal responsibility. Does the use of the word "preferential" here significantly alter the meaning of the paragraph, or is it acceptable to remove? Toaster128 (talk) 05:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- C-Class Libertarianism articles
- High-importance Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class ethics articles
- Mid-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles