Jump to content

Talk:MLS Cup 2023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Resources

[edit]
Team notes
Recaps

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Reviewed: Tap Pryor
    • Comment: More hooks will be added after the match is played on December 9.

Converted from a redirect by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 08:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/MLS Cup 2023; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Unknown
Overall: @SounderBruce: The article looks mostly good, but I think you should submit another hook, if possible, because ALT0 doesn't look very notable, while ALT1 might do the job, but could still be less interesting than some of the facts you've included in the "Post-match" section, for example... Also, I've noticed that your QPQ submission has been handed on to another reviewer: have you taken care of anything else in the meantime? Oltrepier (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Oltrepier: New hooks added, as well as a new QPQ given that my not-binding comments were so harshly rejected there. SounderBruce 07:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce: ALT2 and ALT3 look good! Maybe I would slightly edit them to specify that both these facts have happened this year. Thank you for providing a new QPQ entry, as well: let's see how it develops! Oltrepier (talk) 10:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Oltrepier: Hooks amended, though if this gets pushed back to January they'll have to be fixed again. SounderBruce 02:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce: Sorry, I articulated myself badly: writing "in 2023" would be more than sufficient... : D Oltrepier (talk) 08:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Oltrepier: Let's go with that instead. SounderBruce 00:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce: Alright, then! Please let me know when you complete your QPQ review... Oltrepier (talk) 08:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Oltrepier: it looks like SounderBruce has provided the QPQ. Is there anything else necessary, or can this be approved? Z1720 (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Z1720 and SounderBruce: Oh, sorry, I thought he had to complete it before I could give the green light... Alright, then! Oltrepier (talk) 08:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]