Jump to content

Talk:Lover (Live from Paris)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLover (Live from Paris) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2023Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lover (Live from Paris)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vaughan J. (talk · contribs) 11:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Infobox and lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]
  • Retitle to "Background and release" and merge with the below section, per the short size.  Done
  • "2019, through Republic" → "2019, via Republic"  Done
  • "at the Olympia music hall" → "at the Olympia theater"  Done

Release

[edit]
  • Make this the last two paras of the above section, per the short size.  Done
  • Everything else looks good!

Commercial performance

[edit]

Track listing

[edit]
  • Looks good!

Personnel

[edit]

See also

[edit]
  • The wikilink doesn't mention anything about this LP, so get rid of this section.  Done

Notes

[edit]
  • Looks good!

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score – It looks amazing at 10.7%!
  • The reference list needs a few changes:
  • Ref 1–3, 5–10, 13 – Change the access dates to when you first added them, since this article was expanded between February 28 to March 1.  Partly done – was changed to the current date

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.