Jump to content

Talk:List of presidents of India

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of presidents of India is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on January 26, 2018.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 11, 2009Featured list candidateNot promoted
December 24, 2017Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 4, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Rajendra Prasad was the first President of India and the only one to have held the office for two terms?
Current status: Featured list


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Party status

[edit]

The president represents the country and does not belong to any party either after his election but to the nation 2409:4053:C8D:840B:A4E4:7AC4:29AF:E6E (talk) 21:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current president

[edit]

Syrriana, Ram Nath Kovind is still the president of India. His term will expire on 25 July and Droupadi Murmu hasn't taken oath yet and should not be added to the list. --Bears (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good

Sikkim and Voting Maps

[edit]

The voting maps are very good. The thing to note is that Sikkim joined the Indian Union on 16 May 1975. Therefore till the first 5 presidential elections, the map of India did not include Sikkim. Just to stay historically accurate. Not all to offend Sikkim or anybody. thevikas (talk) 04:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need the "Oath administered by"

[edit]

Aruunn, do we really need this column? The table already has a lot of information (to the point of overloading the reader), most of which is important to keep. This particular column doesn't seem as important and, IMO, can be eliminated. Thoughts? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]