A fact from Liber Gratissimus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1: ... that in his Liber Gratissimus, Peter Damian argues that although simony is worse than adultery or murder, the sacraments administered by simoniac bishops are still valid?
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced, neutral and plagiarismn free. I think the quote in the lead needs a little more context e.g. who said it. Hook is cited and intriguing. Lajmmoore (talk) 22:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lajmmoore Well that's what the citation is for, isn't it? It's not very meaningful to repeat who said it when the citation already provides that information. Nevertheless, I have added another section to give more context. Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬15:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]