Jump to content

Talk:Lego Batman 2: DC Super Heroes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleLego Batman 2: DC Super Heroes was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
March 14, 2022Good article nomineeListed
March 22, 2022Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 20, 2022Peer reviewNot reviewed
April 26, 2022Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Request to merge Lego Batman: The Movie – DC Super Heroes Unite into this article

[edit]

Lego Batman: The Movie is not notable enough to warrant a separate article and only has three citations. elijahpepe@wikipedia 18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merged with no objections. elijahpepe@wikipedia 15:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources

[edit]

Not only this article is poorly written but uses a lot of unreliable sources also for example Dualshockers per Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. 2001:4455:364:A800:5DC:1FFF:D6C9:A8C7 (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At a glance, it appears well-written enough to me. Also, if one or two sources aren't reliable, feel free to be BOLD and replace them. I'm not entirely opposed to a reassessment of this article overall, but I don't think it's worth a reviewer's time based on just calling it poorly written and citing one unreliable source. I've removed the GAR template (for now); I think we should at least establish a good reason for a reassessment before requesting one. Bsoyka (talk) 03:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC) revised 03:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"I think we should at least establish a good reason for a reassessment before requesting one" really? Heyuguys The Geek Generation GameXplain Co Optimus DualShockers IMDB WeKnowGamers Mercury news (blog) Nintendo Insider Bits N' Bricks MCVUK Common sense media Film Racket Home Media Magazine and Dualshockers, thats a lot of unreliable sources + development section needs significant expansion including reception. 2001:4455:364:A800:5DC:1FFF:D6C9:A8C7 (talk) 04:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Poorly written" is not "lacking detail"; no need for the vendetta because of Talk:Microsoft Windows. I'm aware of the issues on this article, and I've been working through trying to solve these issues. Unfortunately, it's a double-edged sword as certain pieces of detail can only be obtained through these sources, which makes the overall content less expansive. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

really?

Yes, and thank you for now doing so. Bsoyka (talk) 04:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Full disclosure - IP asked me to take a look. I don't think this is sufficiently bad to warrant a GAR. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already removed GAR req but the template tag on the article shall remain until all the unreliable sources have been replaced. 2001:4455:364:A800:F8B8:A8BC:E4BE:E3F (talk) 09:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps Dualshockers should be revisited. We are currently dealing with a 7 year old consensus, which doesn't really explain why it's deemed unreliable. the about us page suggests it has an editorial roll. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. DS seems reputable. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lego_Batman_2:_DC_Super_Heroes&oldid=1258874078"