Talk:Laramans

Laramans has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 29, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Catholicism Low‑importance

Laramans is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Kosovo High‑importance

	Laramans is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albania High‑importance

	Laramans is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Ktrimi991 when you get a moment, give it a read.--Calthinus (talk) 04:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Calthinus, te lumshin duart :) I made some edits there some years ago but never had the time to make more. This article deservers attention. Very interesting topic. Ktrimi991 (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Βατο could I request your help with standardizing some of these cites? I know you're good at that :). --Calthinus (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job Calthinus! I will do it soon ;) – Βατο (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Βατο think we could nom this for DYK or GA? --Calthinus (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calthinus yes, it is well written, even for a GA nominee. – Βατο (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me a ping if my presence is requested here, as I'm trying to take a bit of a break, but can check back for constructive purposes. Though any help is appreciated BATO.--Calthinus (talk) 07:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laramans/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article passes GA status - well written, almost no edits or changes needed. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is remarkably clear. Good writing. Made a few minor tweaks myself. Pass.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Pass, no issues.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Citations are good - well referenced, clear attribution to academic sources.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Largely academic sources, some reliable news and other sources. Pass.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Pass, no notable issues.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Pass - no issues found.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Pass, no other major things found.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Pass, level of detail is good.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Potentially controversial topic - reliance on reliable academic sources and clear attribution. Pass.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Pass, no issues.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Pass, no issues found.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are frequent and well-chosen/captioned.
	7. Overall assessment.