Talk:Judicial system of Singapore

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Top‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

1

Requested move 26 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Judicial system of Singapore → Judiciary of Singapore – Standardizing the names of main articles in Category:Judiciaries. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC) relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 13:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Oppose ambiguous naming wikt:judiciary means the body of judges. While "judicial system" clearly refers to the judicial system and not the body of judges -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support: its actually a rather logical move. "Judiciary" means the entire system, not just judges. Its more succinct and can be made uniform across other nation's judiciary pages. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Alternative suggestion: As 70.51.46.195 pointed out, the content of this article is really more about the judicial system than the body of judges. I notice that one of the subcategories of "Category:Judiciaries" is "Category:Court systems by country". Perhaps this article should be renamed "Court system of Singapore"? However, if all the articles named "Judiciary of [country]" in fact cover both the court system and the judiciary, then I have no objection to the proposal to rename the article. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as ambiguous in Commonwealth English. This raft of proposals to rename all of the articles in a one-size-fits-all approach seems rooted in an attempt to apply American terminology worldwide without reference to the various kinds of systems in place. RGloucester — ☎ 15:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Judicial system of Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]