Talk:Jodey Arrington/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Jodey Arrington. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
Sorry about the lack of intro passage, I have never experimented with the infobox before and mistakenly deleted all the info I had worked on beneath it. I will have it fixed within a few hours. Cheers!
NPOV
Not sure where to put this, but Jodey Arrington became Vice Chancellor for Technology & Commercialization several years ago: [1] 66.230.25.76 (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Cris M
I see a long string of glowing descriptions here, this borders on being a resume entry or just biospam. Hairhorn (talk) 03:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
I agree the article is positive toward the subject, but I have been unable, thus far, to find any incorrect facts in the biography. The subject is far from being what I would call an "A-list" subject, but certainly meets the notability guidelines. I do not see a problem, and certainly wouldn't call it biospam. Bradfromthebu (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- The facts aren't in dispute, just the point of view. Hairhorn (talk) 22:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Is there another point of view besides the one stated here? In other words, is there any controversy surrounding this guy? I haven't been able to find anything indicating any conflicts. It seems to me like most articles about a person are going to be largely positive unless the person is controversial, which this guy doesn't appear to be. The only controversial thing is that he worked for a controversial guy (Bush 43), but I don't see any political tilt to this article either. Can you explain further what your complaint is? Thanks in advance and cheers! Bradfromthebu (talk) 20:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
I haven't seen a response from Hairhorn. I don't see a political tilt to the article, nor do I see anything about this guy that would be controversial. It seems like an informative article, etc. etc. If I don't see a response from Hairhorn soon, I would like to remove the NPOV flag. Bradfromthebu (talk) 15:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Notability?
I don't see very much right now, most of it comes from the one Lubbock "tech leader" source. If he doesn't win his election, he fails WP:POLITICIAN. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jodey Arrington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121203032019/http://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/advisorycommittee/minutes.html to http://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/advisorycommittee/minutes.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jodey Arrington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160306124107/https://enrpages.sos.state.tx.us/public/mar01_273_state.htm to https://enrpages.sos.state.tx.us/public/mar01_273_state.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160609171619/https://enrpages.sos.state.tx.us/public/may24_316_state.htm?x=0&y=841&id=99 to https://enrpages.sos.state.tx.us/public/may24_316_state.htm?x=0&y=841&id=99
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)