Talk:Jain philosophy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jain philosophy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Jain philosophy was nominated as a Philosophy and religion good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 18, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Jain philosophy received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Reconstruction of the Article
[edit]This article is a total mess and looks like a taxonomical list of various concepts. I suggest a following reconstruction with following sections with necessary references :
- Nature of Reality
- Ontology and Metaphysics
- Epistemology and Logic
- Morality and Ethics
- The nature of divinity and God
- Karma: Law of Causation
- Soteriology : The path to Liberation
- Determinism and Free will
- Faith and rationality
- History of Jain Philosophy
- Jain Philosophers
Additional Comments are welcome.--Anish (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I think this list can come under a new article "Jain terms and concepts" --Anish (talk) 10:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Peer Review Comments
[edit]Ruhrfisch comments: I am reviewing the five Jainism articles at Peer Review - since there are some similarities between them, I will make some similar comments. You may want to ask for other reviewer's comments at WP:PRV to get some more feedback. I also found this to be an interesting article and hope these suggestions help improve it:
- The article needs to be copyedited - for example, the second sentence has an error Jainism is essentially a transtheistic religion of ancient Indian.[1] Either ...of ancient India.[1] or perhaps ...of ancient Indian origin.[1] works
- While the current lead is well written and a good introduction to the topic, it does not summarize the whole article. My rule of thumb is to see that each section header is at least mentioned in the lead, even if only a phrase or word. So, for example, Karma is a section, but it not in the lead. See WP:LEAD
- References come right after the punctuation and need a space following them, so "...blah.[1] Blah" See WP:CITE
- The article is fairly well sourced, but needs more references - any quote or attribution should be sourced, so Mahāpurāṇa of Ācārya Jinasena is famous for this quote -... needs a ref (where does he write this?) Also none of the Traditions subsections or Philosophers section are referenced. See WP:V
- References themselves need to follow consistent format - for example page numbers are given for some book references, but not all, or some use a number and other use p. and a number
- Per the WP:MOS, please do not repeat the title of the article in section headers, or start a header with The, so "Schools of Jain Philosophy" would just be "Schools" and "Jain Philosophers" could probably just be "Philosophers" since we already know the article is about Jainism. Also "The nature of divinity and God" could just be "Nature of divinity and God"
- Try to avoid jargon where possible or explain it - the article does a fairly good job explaining non-English terms, but there are some philosophical / religious terms that could use a breif explanatory phrase or sentence. Syādvāda is the theory of conditioned predication... what is conditioned predication? See WP:JARGON and WP:PCR
- There are a fair number of lists of principles in bold - may of these could be wikilinked, such as Ahisma
Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
better translation for "right faith, right knoledge, right conduct"
[edit]Dear Authors,
I would suggest that "right faith, right knowledge,and right action" be replaced with "enlightened perception/perspective, enlightened knowledge, and enlightened action. The words are translated from Samyag Darshan, Samyag Gnaana, Samyag Chartitra. From my conversation with Jain scholars, the word "Samayag" is a combination of the words "enlightened" and "rational", perhaps "enlightened being the stronger word if only one were to be used. I usually translate the word Samyag to "enlightened/rational", using the "/" mark.
"Darshan", I have seen translatied as a combination of "perception/perspective" again with the "/" mark. The word "Right" is an archaic translation that does not capture the meaning of the word "Samyag".
Thanks
Tushar Mehta MD CCFP —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehtat (talk • contribs) 16:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Jain philosophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060722002023/http://www.rep.routledge.com:80/article/F005SECT1 to http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/F005SECT1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Jainism articles
- Top-importance Jainism articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- High-importance Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism articles