Talk:Ivo Frank

Ivo Frank is currently a World history good article nominee. Nominated by Tomobe03 (talk) at 15:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: Croatian lawyer and politician (1877–1939)

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copy edit

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

SilkPyjamas (talk) 16:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ivo Frank/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 15:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 13:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this page. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Discussion

All images have captions. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There has never been a revert on this article and its not being constantly updated. It definitely meets the stability criteria. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig found nothing wrong. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just went and fixed up the grammar. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The lede and layout are all good and the rest don't apply. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't seem to be too much detail. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also seems pretty neutral. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't think of any other major details to add. It has early life, career, his relationship with Ustaše. I can't think of much else. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck