Talk:Hall church

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed content

I removed this content "quireHamilton85 (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2013 (UTC)". --Erik den yngre (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Term

@Yo.dazo:The problem is that differently from German, Dutch and French terminology, the English Term "hall church" marks two different types of church buildings, aisled churches with equal heights of nave and aisles (as in this article), but also large aisleless churches. In descriptions provided by Historic Environment in Scotland, I fond the term applied for three aisleless churches, but nowhere for an aisled church.--Ulamm (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ulamm I understand the confusion, but we are not in a position to redefine or revise these established terms. However, this issue does need clarification—perhaps it can go in an additional paragraph in the introduction. Yo.dazo (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]