Talk:Guidelines for human subject research

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dsun15.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global perspective

What big controversies and significant research guidelines have been created within specific countries? I have tried to find sources about regional variations in policy and have not found any. Who has sources? Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty good page, but there are a couple things I think that could be improved on. I think the introduction could be beefed up to give the article more historical context. Also I think there are some historical events worth including that aren't currently included - like the creation of the IRB and such. What is included in the article already is explained very well, and is very well researched. Add a little more and I think it'll be a great article. Sarfrazzle (talk) 00:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]