Talk:Frederick III, Elector of Saxony

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Lutheranism Mid‑importance

	Frederick III, Elector of Saxony is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints Mid‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Misdirected link

I'm not sure if there is a page on Frederick's mother - however, clicking on Elizabeth of Bavaria in the ancestor tree at the bottom will lead to a completely different person. I'm not proficient enough in Wiki to correct this - so I just wanted to point it out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.246.64 (talk) 01:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protestant or Catholic in spirit?

The article says he both "greatly supported Martin Luther's teachings" and "remained a Roman Catholic". How could he have supported greatly anything Luther taught after 1517 while remaining a Roman Catholic in doctrine? If he was not Roman Catholic in doctrine but in outward allegiance, that needs to be clarified, for otherwise there is a discrepancy and calling him a Lutheran Roman Catholic seems absurd. Srnec 05:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many at the time agreed that the Church needed reform, but were not ready to go so far as to break communion with Rome. Furthermore, Luther's teachings on sacramental theology (consubstantiation) were far outside the standard understanding of Chrisitanity's most important Sacrament (i.e., transubstantiation), which would have left many at the time uncomfortable. Reforming the moral climate of the Church: yes; changing the sacramental teaching of the Christianity: No. MishaPan 19:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article states: "Frederick was Pope Leo X's candidate for Holy Roman Emperor in 1519 — the pope had awarded him the Golden Rose of virtue on September 3, 1518 —, but he helped secure the election of Charles V." Who is the "he" that helped secure the election of Charles V? Was he Pope Leo X or Frederick III? MishaPan 19:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems sort of biased to me -- for instance "But he was too large-hearted and possessed too noble a nature." and "The attitude of the elector was due rather to his love of justice..." and "...but seldom has a prince practised [sic] greater self-renunciation." Zaporozhian 00:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Man and his Empire Were BLACK

So why these fake paintings and coins with no face on them? http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/Crests/History_of_the_Holy_Roman_Empire_3.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.188.138.102 (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elector's Dream contains problematic content

Frederick_III,_Elector_of_Saxony#The_Elector's_Dream contains much that seems to be from a different site or maybe from the referenced book that isn't clearly identified. Public domain status doesn't remove the requirement to cite it properly and use quotation marks where appropriate.

Additionally, much of the content in this section is written in a biased and non-encyclopedic style. The style seems archaic, lending further support to the idea that it comes directly from an improperly cited source. in particular, it seems to leave the description of the dream and proceed to the next day and describe the actual (alleged) nailing of the Theses, but it describes this in flowery language.-DeirdreAnne^{(talk • contribs)} 06:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eg. "On the 31st of October, the day preceding the festival, a monk went boldly to the church, to which a crowd of worshipers was already repairing, and affixed to the door ninety-five propositions against the doctrine of indulgences. That monk was Martin Luther. He went alone; not one of his most intimate friends knew of his design." (Edit: Quotation marks mine) -DeirdreAnne^{(talk • contribs)} 06:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further, "By these theses the doctrine of indulgences was fearlessly opposed. It was shown that the power to grant the pardon of sin, and to remit its penalty, had never been committed to the pope, or to any other man. The whole scheme was a farce, an artifice to extort money by playing upon the superstitions of the people, a device of Satan to destroy the souls of all who should trust to its lying pretensions. It was also clearly shown that the gospel of Christ was the most valuable treasure of the church, and that the grace of God, therein revealed, was freely bestowed upon all who should seek it by repentance and faith.

"God was directing the labors of this fearless builder, and the work he wrought was firm and sure. He had faithfully presented the doctrine of grace, which would destroy the assumptions of the pope as a mediator, and lead the people to Christ alone as the sinner's sacrifice and intercessor. Thus was the elector's dream already beginning to be fulfilled. The pen which wrote upon the church door extended to Rome, disturbing the lion in his lair, and jostling the pope's diadem. [6]"

(Quotation marks are all mine). I suspect this is ripped verbatim from the source at the referenced "[6]". -DeirdreAnne^{(talk • contribs)} 06:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would happily kill the whole dream section. We don't write an entire section on a dream for any other historical person. If it's significant we mention it briefly and move on. BananaBork (talk) 08:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

supposedly

2 reference is to another document that itself references some other document - there is no direct reference , typical how wikipedia opinion masquerading as fact — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.130.142.29 (talk) 22:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]