Talk:Fan wiki

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fan wiki article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fan wiki has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 20, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

A fact from Fan wiki appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that some fan wikis document fan fiction?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fan wiki.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen talk 07:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that some editors left Wikipedia to form Wookieepedia, a Star Wars franchise fan wiki, because other editors complained that they were including too much information in Star Wars articles?

Source: Jones, Henry (2021). "Wikis". In Baker, Mona; Blaagaard, Bolette B.; Jones, Henry; Pérez-González, Luis (eds.). The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media. Critical Perspectives in Citizen Media (ebook ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-61981-1.

ALT1: ... that some fan wikis document fan fiction? Source: Mittell, Jason (2013). "Wikis and Participatory Fandom". In Delwiche, Aaron; Henderson, Jennifer Jacobs (eds.). The Participatory Cultures Handbook (ebook ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 40–41. ISBN 978-0-203-11792-7.
ALT2: ... that the Star Trek Beyond writers Simon Pegg and Doug Jung consulted the Star Trek fan wiki Memory Alpha and its administrators during the film's production? Source: Comerford, Chris (November 2018). "Participatory Toolboxes: Franchise Fan Wikis as Tools of Textual Production" (PDF). Participations. 15 (2): 286–287.
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Iktara (song)

Created by Voorts (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Fun article that meets all of the necessary criteria; AGF on the book sources, as I can't quite seem to get ebook access. I prefer ALT1 and ALT0 slightly behind it; ALT0 might be navel-gazing, but works fine, while ALT2 is a bit too wordy and includes too many links that bury the actual article. Sounder Bruce 03:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks. I agree that ALT1 is probably the best; it's pithy and actually about the article topic writ large, instead of just an example. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Omission?

Is this deliberately omitting Fanlore (the Organization for Transformative Works' fan history wiki)? Not sure whether there are WP-level indept sources available (it never got the traction of AO3) but as a fan it feels like an important development as a big fannish wiki not hosted by the usual suspects. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't come up in my research. The article is mostly sourced to scholarly literature, and only a few wikis have been written about. I'll look into it, though. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's some aca sources at the end of the Fanlore article on itself [1] -- of which [2] is open access, English, indept and has coverage; it states that Fanlore is archived at the Digital Culture Web Archive of the American Folklife Center and talks a bit about the GeoCities Rescue Project. (Full disclosure: I used to be an admin on Fanlore some years back.) Espresso Addict (talk) 04:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]