Talk:Eobard Thawne

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

aka Eobard Thine

In Flash #350 his name is shown as Eobard Thine. Should that be reflected in the article? Also, can anyone provide a reference for the other Eobard version of his name shown in the article?--Rockfang (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

silver age test identical to the modern age one

I don't know which one is more correct: any speedster's fan able to fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.93.128.32 (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is odd and looks a whole lot like vandalism.The references even go to the same issue, which can't be right. The first looks like what happened before the Crisis- I once had that issue. (I trust this is what's called the "Silver Age"????) I have no idea what happened after, when my comicreading dropped off considerably unfortunately. Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:14, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That particular paragraph was taken care of. Vandalism of User:Nightwing100. Returned the info written from March 15 2010. A lot more clearer and less confusing. The rest of the fictional biography seems to be intact. Arimis (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retcon history redundant

Could be shortened? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oteta (talk • contribs) 14:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Characterization

I suggest a section describing the changes in the way Zoom speaks, which is now mechanical and full of Z's if I recall correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oteta (talk • contribs) 14:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit

--The copyeditor's corner 10:44, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Zythe, if an editor disagrees with your changes, you don't edit-war it back into place. You discuss it with them on the talk page. The "trivia" that you mention to me is clearly relevant to the section. Nothing wrong with giving background about that version of the character. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't disagree with my changes, you sent me a bland automessage about "not leaving an edit summary" for an obvious change, and then a way overblown "you may be banned for reverting it back" attack message when I did it again with an edit summary. The content, full of trivia about Oliver Queen's age and so on, clearly isn't how we're supposed to write about fictional characters. Please read WP:Writing about fiction.Zythe (talk) 19:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with it being gone. Nevermind. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 19:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Title of this article

Graham87, regarding this, merge or not, shouldn't this article remain titled Professor Zoom? Flyer22 (talk) 02:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Graham87, never mind; I see that it was already titled Eobard Thawne. Flyer22 (talk) 02:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

There have been numerous events of disruptive editing, vandalism and edit warring on this article. Should page protection be requested? By viewing the edit history, it is clear that the consistent disruptive editing must stop. --JokEobard (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]