Talk:Entrapment (film)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British / German / Southeast Asian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Rock-climbing equipment#Rappel devices (descenders)|descender]] The anchor (#Rappel devices (descenders)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Eilean Donan Castle

Eilean Donan Castle was NOT a location used in this movie. It is true that the location scouting initially considered Eilean Donan but all the castle shots are exclusively Duart and there are absolutely no shots of Eilean Donan. The two castle do look alike, especialy if you see Duart from the seaward side, but a close look at the movie will reveal that Eilean Donan does not feature. This myth arose from various Tourist information publications which were written by people who quite obviously had never visited either Duart nor Eilean Donan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.33.167 (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysia

Complaints also arose from Malaysia, with some claiming that the movie depicted Malaysia as a backwards country, and was factually inaccurate.

Why did they feel offended? Don't they say that Malaysia is a socalled "Country with first world infrastructure and third world mentality" ?. 82.156.162.229 5 July 2005 11:58 (UTC)

If someone were to make a movie about assasinating your Prime Minister/President and portray your country in a bad light, assuming you have a some sense of patrotism, would you like this kind of movie? --Andylkl ^(talk) July 9, 2005 11:32 (UTC)

I'm confused about the assasinating of the prime minster. Where in the movie do they say anything about this? The only movie in recent times that I can think of that did that was Zoolander, which should rightly be banned (IMHO). Also, from above, please clarify who "they" is. Who says Malaysia is a "Country...". Was this from the movie or from some other source relevant to this article?

I'm terribly embarrased to say this, but I had somehow got the plot for this movie confused with Zoolander. --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 15:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too Much Butt

This is an embarassment. The article spends a few lines talking about the movie's plot and just about the rest of the article talking about Catherine Zeta-Jones's butt. How about some class? This is certainly not something that should be found in an encyclopedia. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 20:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The article is an absolute disgrace, and hardly encyclopaedic. Someone needs to fix it up quick-smart. I elliot 10:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to be bold and remove the entire segment altogether. A passing comment about it should be sufficient, but this is overkill to be honest. --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 15:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a much briefer "Critical reaction" section. I think it should be mentioned, as that's just about all anyone remembers from the film. Alanhwiki 23:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Someone should have researched what the critics really said. They loved it. Also I think it's time this section about Malaysia not liking the movie be brought down. There is no citation and at this point with all the rest of this stupid article out there it's starting to constitute libel. Is this the pervert from eFilmCritic trying to get everybody to agree with him? Does he have it in for Sean Connery? Or Jon Amiel? Clearly this was planned defamation. Disgraceful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.5.12.208 (talk) 19:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler

Needs a Spoiler tag! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.121.155 (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia doesn't use spoiler tags. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Entrapment film.jpg

Image:Entrapment film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One critic?

About the critic of Weinberg: "With a dazzling performance, Catherine Zeta-Jones dominates the picture with absolute assurance and a bewitching smile." The same page. Critic of Steven Rhodes. Why just one critic is quoted? 201.255.43.23 (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Synopsis

Hey, how about a plot synopsis? At least some blurb like from the back of the DVD case. SuperChencho (talk) 00:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was, but this article has been trashed so many times---why bother anymore?

Catherine at the piano

Did she really play Bach's prelude? 46.169.36.27 (talk) 22:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]