Talk:Dina Ali Lasloom

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 April 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Saudi Arabia Low‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

"This article is being considered for deletion"

Why? This is a noteworthy story that people need info on. Just because the lamestream media is all but refusing to talk about it doesn't mean we should censor it here. This is something that needs to be seen.CitationKneaded (talk) 19:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everybody, I think this is an article of general interest and in particular interest for human rights groups and for the feminists / the global movement for women's rights. The Dina Ali (Dina Ali Lasloom) case is a political issue of the very first rank and can therefore not be missed in an encyclopedia. 79.251.119.62 (talk) 22:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's also got a special place in the hearts of those who aren't Feminists but who do care. Feminists aren't the only ones out there who care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.31.156 (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC) It looks like a legitimate article about a legitimate subject; I don't see reasons to delete. HeloPait (talk) 09:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Name

Perhaps we should add the Arabic spelling (دينا علي‏) (Dina Ali). 79.251.119.62 (talk) 23:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Google search

This article doesn't come up if I type "Dina Ali" or even "Dina Ali wikipedia" in google search. Does it happen to anyone else? DaisyBeam (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I've the same problem. If I type '"Dina Ali" wikipedia article english -sabah' I get the JPG image of Dina's backside in the airport. Does this mean that this article is blacklisted from Google? Im not afraid (talk) 21:28, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jnameless was right, it's now appearing in google searches Im not afraid (talk) 20:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Google indexing will take time, maybe a week or 2.

If anyone has the full videos (or audio of Dina's pleas), or knows how to add an image to the info box, that would help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnameless (talk • contribs) 15:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"A security officer three middle eastern men doing this"

Does it mean "a security officer *and* three men..." or "a security officer *saw* three men doing this"? Can't figure out what that sentence means. Was the security officer a participant or a witness? DaisyBeam (talk) 22:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs more links to other articles to help integrate it into the encyclopedia

I've added links to the relevant articles, is it ok to remove this template now? DaisyBeam (talk) 10:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is Dina Ali Lasloom dead

I did a few minutes of google research about Dina Ali Lasloom and found this article that was published April 21, 2017

https://www.libertyfighters.uk/middle-east/honor-killing-in-saudi-arabia-the-converted-christian-woman-repatriated-from-australia-killed-by-her-own-brother/

"According to Human Rights Watch (HRW) Dina Ali was declared dead by King Fahad Hospital officials today at 8 A.M. local time due to “a bullet piercing her left lung.”"

I have not added this information to the Wikipedia article myself because it has been two years since it was published and I am just wondering if this news turned out to be incorrect. Information about Dina Ali Lasloom has become more relevant because of the case of Rahaf Mohammed Alqunun and news sources around the world are probably relying in part on the wikipedia article about Dina Ali Lasloom for information. David Straub (talk) 13:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'libertyfighters.uk' is the opposite of a reliable source. Jeroen N (talk) 10:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is has there been a source found that says she's still alive? Every single citation on this page is from 2017 or earlier. David Straub (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unless and until a reliable source is cited in which a person is declared to be deceased, you can reasonably assume that person to be alive. After all, while a 2017 source does not prove that someone is still alive today, neither does a source from 2018 or even one from 3 February 2019. The onus is on those claiming she has died to cite reliable sources supporting that claim. Jeroen N (talk) 16:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Dina Ali2.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]