Talk:Central Powers/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: BarntToust (talk · contribs) 13:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Alright, so given that this article was unsuccessfully nom'd about a month ago with strict decline owing to the state of a few citations, I'll have to look into more of those, besides accuracy spot-checks, to see that those concerns from the prior reviewer have been fully addressed.

Current GA review status: Work in progress.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·