Talk:Capital punishment in Singapore
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Capital punishment in Singapore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Capital punishment in Singapore received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Capital punishment in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211204525/http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40319 to http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40319
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090121151421/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/World/GE16Wd06.html to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/World/GE16Wd06.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Capital punishment in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120329033044/http://www.dnainfo.com/20120326/manhattan/us-could-learn-from-singapores-harsh-drug-laws-bloomberg-says to http://www.dnainfo.com/20120326/manhattan/us-could-learn-from-singapores-harsh-drug-laws-bloomberg-says
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Is capital punishment the norm in East Asia?
[edit]The lead states " Capital punishment is considered the norm in East Asia ..." This is debatable and, arguably, an unhelpful and lazy generalisation. Firstly, is Singapore in East Asia? Definitions vary, but usually include "China, Japan, Mongolia, North Korea, South Korea, and Taiwan" but not Singapore - although Wikipedia itself says (and I've been criticised before for using Wiki as a source) "Countries such as Singapore and Vietnam are also considered a part of the East Asian cultural sphere due to its cultural, religious, and ethnic similarities". Whatever definition is used we should note that Mongolia, Macau and Hong Kong have all abolished the death penalty. In South-East Asia, which Singapore is geographically a part of, Cambodia and the Phillippines have abolished the death penalty while Myanmar is regarded as 'abolitionist-in-practice'[1] having not carried out an execution since 1985. So the death penalty is not the norm in the region. Unless anyone feels this statement makes an important and valid point I suggest it's removed.BobBadg (talk) 07:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Second the sentiments of BobBadg. The claim, now modified to “Capital punishment is considered the standard in East and Southeast Asia…” is confusing in intent and, even in a broader context, in-and-of-itself. As indicated, it is demonstrably true that capital punishment is not a standard of punishment for many nations of the indicated regions. Furthermore, if there are historical reasons relevant to the understanding of capital punishment in Singapore related to the region’s broader historical or cultural trends, surely they are elaborate enough in their own right to merit their inclusion in a “History” section, with adequate references and Wikilinks to other relevant pages. Perhaps (most broadly) the claim is meant to suggest that capital punishment is recognized as a legitimate form of punishment in Singapore (hence, the inclusion of the United States among other East and Southeast Asian nations). If so, surely the immediate following paragraph referencing a “95%” approval among Singapore citizens affirms that position while avoiding the problematic suggestions of the prior paragraph. For these reasons, both the claim and the subsequent list of nations where capital punishment is practice should be removed and, if replaced, given an elaboration of matching magnitude. The Intervocalic Sigma (talk) 03:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- The text appears to have been added here by a blocked editor who makes things up, so it's not a claim on very firm ground. CMD (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Notable cases of people sentenced to death
[edit]Why is everyone executed/pending execution recently are counted as "notable" and has their own Wikipedia article. They are criminals. SecretSquirrel78 (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)