This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bonnie and Clyde article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2019, when it received 10,093,049 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report7 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Bonnie and Clyde were inspiration for the character, "Bonnie" in Brawl Stars. (And her cannon whom is named Clyde) Could this go under the 'Pop Culture - Videogames' section or is it too unrelated to go under that category? Whaleboats (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It says that W.D. Jones said that Clyde was gay, but Jones did not. Actually, the author of the source given, Toland, was the one who started that rumor in the book cited. He had no reference for saying Clyde was gay, and should not be considered as a valid source.I can’t change it, but if someone could, that’d be great. MeepMorp27 (talk) 05:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article says: "Some of the more lurid lies that he told concerned the gang's sex lives, and this testimony gave rise to many stories about Barrow's ambiguous sexuality." Are you saying that's wrong? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Music Section
-Yeah I think we need a discussion on the music paragraph. Whoever is being a fascist about deciding which songs can and can't be listed in the pop culture section needs to take a step back. Any songs referencing Bonnie and Clyde should be listed. Like what's the point of someone reading Wikipedia to learn more information when you are literally lmao actively hiding information about songs referencing Bonnie and Clyde. Or just make a separate paragraph stating that the titles reference the names but the lyrical content is unrelated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.156.215.119 (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The hidden note there clearly gives (amongst other things) this instruction: "DO NOT ADD THE EMINEM SONG "97 BONNIE AND CLYDE", IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS PAIR, AND WILL BE REMOVED." Your addition has been removed with the edit summary "revert IP editor using multiple IP's to avoid edit warring block, ignoring WP:BRD, and ignoring editing note". Martinevans123 (talk) 11:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You should read it before you link it ["BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes."]. This discussion is dead, there seems to be no one against this edit to make the page better. Summerfell1978 (talk) 12:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Given the recent history of the edits to that section, and the admin sanctions to the anon IP concerned, I'm surprised you think that "this discussion is dead." I think it's a little early to decide that "no one is against" your edit. If the hidden note is misguided, there should be a discussion here to remove it. But I don't personally see the point in adding references to songs that have nothing to so with Bonnie and Clyde, apart from the use of their names in the title. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the songs had nothing to do with Bonnie and Clyde, their names wouldn't be in the song titles. Their lyrics illustrate fictional stories of duos committing crime, based off of Bonnie and Clyde. I'd say that's quite important to list in the article; it conveys the significance of Bonnie and Clyde's influence in popular culture. I cannot accept a hidden note as an unchallengeable directive that's set in stone. Every user has the right to edit Wikipedia articles to improve their quality and ensure they better serve the readers. Summerfell1978 (talk) 12:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Bonnie and Clyde rap song is so influential that a 46 year old surgeon who understands nothing about rap, knows about the song and the real Bonnie and Clyde thanks to a medical student who substituted the lyrics with medical terminology to help students and physicians remember contraindications of several pharmaceutical medications. I really don't understand the ban from the article page about this fact, if it is something that has reached doctors in the most obscure way. Summerfell1978 (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Bonnie" and "Clyde" are just personal names. Their use together, in the name of any song, tells us nothing about the subject matter of that song. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You think it's a coincidence that musicians titled their song title two random names that happened to be Bonnie and Clyde? If you read the lyrics you'll know what the song is about. I personally don't see any reasoning or logic in any of your previous statements regarding this matter. Summerfell1978 (talk) 13:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Two of those songs mention Bonnie and Clyde in the song title. Both of those songs are about fictional stories of a duo participating in crime à la Bonnie and Clyde style. The third song is titled Just The Two Of Us and is a different version of the song '97 Bonnie & Clyde. The fourth song has no mention of Bonnie and Clyde in the title, but is referenced in the song. Summerfell1978 (talk) 13:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So perhaps we need a separate thread to discuss each of those separately. If you think the hidden note is wrong, we'll need to open a further thread to discuss its removal. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, we don't need to do that. That hidden note has no supreme ruling over my opinion nor the opinion of any other Wikipedia user. I consider this discussion over. Summerfell1978 (talk) 14:14, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Provided each of proposed additions is fully discussed here, the hidden note might be unnecessary. But I suspect that it was only added in the light of previous disagreements and as a way of avoiding edit warring. So I think there ought to be a proper discussion of its merits. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Going forward, it might be a good idea to find independent third-party WP:RS sources, for all of the songs listed, which establish their connection to the subject outlaws, rather just relying on sources which simply support the existence of the song and/or just show the lyrics. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, we don't need to cite any sourcesto establish the song title's connection to the outlaws, because the song title references the outlaws in the most literal way possible. I consider this discussion over. Summerfell1978 (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For someone who has been editing for only the past 21 days, you seem remarkably sure of Wikipedia policy and of your own edits. I'm not sure that songs deserve inclusion here purely on the basis of your own personal opinion. But I'd be happy to see the views of other editors. I don't consider this discussion to be over. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding Eminem's "'97 Bonnie & Clyde" and "Just the Two of Us", whether they are actually about Bonnie and Clyde or not, are just the same song with different titles? So, if they were inspired by the outlaws, they should be combined into one entry. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]