User talk:Summerfell1978

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Kordofan giraffe, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Adakiko (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop what? We can't even edit decimanls in numbers? No one uses ','. Summerfell1978 (talk) 13:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

decimals. Summerfell1978 (talk) 13:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to JJ Redick have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: JJ Redick was changed by Summerfell1978 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909509 on 2025-01-04T08:51:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Byron Scott, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 11:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citation. Thank you for reminding me! Summerfell1978 (talk) 12:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the NBC and Seattle Times sources. I removed BR, as it's generally not been considered reliable (Wikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball Association/References#Generally unreliable). Apologies if "unsourced" in the edit summary was misleading to you. Implicitly it refers to reliable sources, which is consistent with the verifiability policy:

In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means that people are able to check that information comes from a reliable source.

Today I learned that even borderline All-Stars are considered by some to be "role players". Thanks again. —Bagumba (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Summerfell1978! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! —Bagumba (talk) 11:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Oregano, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used." But if you go back to 2001 it was never clarified. Furthermore Josh Grosse the user is a Canadian mathmatician. Why can't we use 'flavor' instead of 'flavour'? British English is dying. American English is standard now. Summerfell1978 (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oregano. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.
Again, you changed wikt:flavours to wikt:flavors - see those Wikitionary definitions. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]