This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Bdt2hw (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declared below)
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Hello fellow editors, I reviewed the Bible Project article thoroughly and paid close attention to potential issues such as biased language, promotional content, or unsupported claims. I also compared the content with the provided sources to ensure the information is accurate and properly cited. Based on my review, I did not find any notable concerns that would violate Wikipedia's content policies. I believe the article meets the guidelines and is presented from a neutral point of view. I would appreciate any further input from the community and would like to discuss the possibility of removing the COI tag. Thank you. Veteranbv (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Glenn Shrom typing: I see no editorial bias in the wording of the article. Additionally, I know of zero examples of unbiased additional information that could round out the content presented here already. I am familiar with the Bible Project, and I follow any news articles about them. No scandals about them as an organization, or anything like that. Numerous disagreements (not from me) about their theology that I don't think are relevant to Wikipedia's mission. It is my hope also that the COI tag would removed, and I thought that perhaps by typing something here, the COI removal suggestion could get revisited. It's been over a year since the previous post. I don't care if my post gets deleted, just wanted a revisit. I'm not much of a contributing member, and don't mind my two cents perspective being generally ignored. After all, I didn't go to the trouble of following talk page guidelines, so you have every right to delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:987:C100:5A40:54F1:ED96:997F:239 (talk) 19:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have read the article and find no need for the tag. I am happy to remove it, however, I will wait a bit in case of any new responses. XZealous (talk) 06:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do follow what BibleProject is doing and listen to some of their podcasts, but I concur that it does not read as an advertisement nor does it have any blatant COI violations. Not going to remove the tag myself because I appreciate their work, but those are my two cents. (TLDR: It doesn't need the orange tag) ❤HistoryTheorist❤18:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
