Talk:Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in July 2024.

'Repealed' wording okay for IPC?

this edit by @Sree1959 seem to introduce wording repealed for IPC. From this news IPC is likely to remain in force on old cases.

.. that has repealed the 164-year-old British era Indian Penal Code (IPC)..

.. Twenty new offences have been added to the BNS. Nineteen provisions in the repealed IPC have also been dropped. ..

This reference used by User:Sree1959 seem to use wording replaced not repealed. IMO some one who knows nuances need to look into the same. Bookku (talk) 16:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Replace" is the correct term since pending cases will still be tried under IPC. — hako9 (talk) 15:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. If necessary, please initiate a more centralized discussion regarding the naming of related articles. Dekimasuよ! 07:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita → Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – As per the earlier request, now that the bill is passed and the Act is live. - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bharatiya_Nyaya_Sanhita,_2023&oldid=1189635548 Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:39, 15 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. FOARP (talk) 10:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans 16:26, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Just as its predecessor is without a year, this should be too. Arnav Bhate (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acts are supposed be read with year Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Looking over other articles in Category:Law of India and its subcategories, it appears that the year is occasionally included in the titles of articles about Indian laws, but that it is frequently omitted. To that end, there are two questions I find myself with. (1) Is there a regular pattern dictating whether Indian law article titles include the year or not? If so, what is the pattern? (2) If there are criteria that must be met for us to prefer one style or the other, does this article meet those criteria? ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. This needs a broader discussion for all the pages in this category. SerChevalerie (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Noticeboard for India-related topics and WikiProject Law have been notified of this discussion. Reading Beans 16:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.