Jump to content

Talk:Battle for Graxia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal

[edit]

As stated in the wikia for Rise of Immortals which contains the information given to the public by developers Petroglyph Games, Battle of Graxia is a reboot of Rise of Immortals, not a new game. Another proof of this statement is that Battle of Graxia has already completely replaced the old game client for Rise of Immortals. In light of this, I propose to merge the two articles Battle for Graxia and Rise of Immortals into a single one called Rise of Immortals: Battle for Graxia (that is also the official name given by Petroglyph). --87.15.64.200 (talk) 04:25, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle for Graxia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]