Jump to content

Talk:Apollo Global Management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleApollo Global Management was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 16, 2009Good article nomineeListed
July 12, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Edit to lead sentence

[edit]

Hello, I work for Apollo, and would like to suggest an update for accuracy. Please amend the first sentence to clarify that Apollo is an alternative asset management firm, not a private equity firm. Here are recent sources that support this edit: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

References

  1. ^ "Japan's aging savers entice U.S. asset manager Apollo Global". Nikkei Asia. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  2. ^ Garcia, Luis; Ojea, Sabela (2023-05-09). "Apollo's Income Rebounds, Partly Thanks to Record Fee Earnings". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  3. ^ "As Private Credit Surges, Banks and Alternative Asset Managers Turn Frenemies Rather Than Foes". Institutional Investor. 2023-12-04. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  4. ^ Rubin, April (2023-12-06). "University leaders hammered after congressional hearing on antisemitism". Axios.
  5. ^ "Private credit finds its next big target: investment-grade debt". www.ft.com. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  6. ^ "Apollo Sees Private Credit 'Best Entry Point' on Low Liquidity". Bloomberg.com. 2023-03-09. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  7. ^ "Apollo to Launch Private Fund in Asset-Based Financing Buildout". Bloomberg.com. 2023-07-20. Retrieved 2023-12-18.

Thank you, Chamanch123 (talk) 14:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chamanch123: I'm looking at the Apollo website, and I'm seeing references to private equity as a part of the firm's strategy. The firm self-labels as "alternative asset management", and I'm seeing some descriptions of Apollo as being a private markets firm (for example, here). Can you clarify a bit about the business model? It's not clear to me that Apollo isn't a PE firm, even if that's not all it does. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Red-tailed hawk,
These terms really are confusing, I appreciate you for asking for clarification.
Apollo Global Management is an alternative asset management firm, and one of the strategies we employ is private equity. Our website explains this pretty well. Asset management is the umbrella term for what Apollo does, and private equity, credit, and real assets all fall under the umbrella of asset management. So the correct descriptor for what we do is alternative asset management.
Let me know if this explanation was helpful, I hope you will consider implementing the edit in the first sentence of the article. Thanks, Chamanch123 (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chamanch123 I had a look and agree that asset manager is a more accurate description for the overall business despite a lot of the investments being in private equity. I have update the lede with a better description based on the request. Sargdub (talk) 22:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 22:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 2009 promotion has some statements lacking citations and a lot of WP:PROSELINE issues for events past 2005. I am also not sure about the breadth of coverage for this article since most of it is just the History section. Spinixster (trout me!) 11:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.