Jump to content

User contributions for Repku

A user with 2,480 edits. Account created on 22 July 2006.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

28 August 2022

9 August 2021

  • 02:4102:41, 9 August 2021 diff hist +107 Fulmar Relationship with humans
  • 02:3602:36, 9 August 2021 diff hist +1 Fulmar Relationship with humans: Formatting mistake forgot to preview.
  • 02:3202:32, 9 August 2021 diff hist +15 Fulmar Hunting: Just realized the section made it sound like fulmars hunt. 'Upgraded' the section from a sub-section of the birds behavior to a full section about its relationship with humans. More sub-categories could be used if their interaction and relationship with humans and/or the meat or material humans use from them is expanded upon.
  • 02:2602:26, 9 August 2021 diff hist +108 Fulmar Exploitation: Editing for negative nuance of the imprecise term 'exploitation' which subtly biases (unintentionally or not) to an extreme animal welfare position and can potentially mislead readers. I understand that to exploit can be a neutral term, but I think 'hunt' conveys more precise and useful information. Fulmars don't appear to be endangered or even near-threatened and they're actually hunted (shot, netted, etc.) not just grabbed or something.

15 April 2021

24 May 2020

20 March 2020

12 March 2020

22 October 2019

9 September 2019

20 August 2019

9 August 2019

30 July 2019

12 May 2019

  • 00:0600:06, 12 May 2019 diff hist +12 Molotov cocktail Does igniting not "obliterate" some targets? Wording is vague. Probably assumes more knowledge than the average reader's understanding of fires/explosions/etc

14 September 2018

7 September 2018

  • 07:2407:24, 7 September 2018 diff hist +19 Ys (series) Its important to distinguish between personal perception and what the media and/or company actually say. Instead of saying its a flagship title, it would better to find the company calling it such or an outlet saying such and provide that further knowledge to the reader. Show don't tell.

31 May 2018

28 May 2018

  • 18:1618:16, 28 May 2018 diff hist −19 Market capitalization Undid revision 843369673 by Repku (talk) No. Just okay, it doesn't work. Just makes it sound like there's only one "point in time" or something. Okay I'm done now. Tag: Undo
  • 18:1418:14, 28 May 2018 diff hist +19 Market capitalization No I guess it is needed somewhere. But I don't think its necessary to mention after this. This is actually kind of hard so I'll leave this part alone.
  • 18:0218:02, 28 May 2018 diff hist −36 Market capitalization I mean... yeah its just overexplanation. If people understand that share price changes over time, trying to mention time just makes things worse. Its just too much of a programmer's explanation for humans. They just have to understand that the share price and number of shares changes and assume its for a particular point in time.
  • 17:5617:56, 28 May 2018 diff hist +36 Market capitalization No edit summary
  • 17:5017:50, 28 May 2018 diff hist −8 Market capitalization Adding a "point in time" is over-explanation. If we go that deep, its not even a "point" really, but an average over a period of time. Calling it a point adds an unnecessary layer of confusion. We could have it if worded well enough, but I can't think how to do that right now without making a confusing sentence or using the word "current". Investopedia avoids it. I'll think on it more, but I think this works. Also, general clean up for readability.

6 April 2018

5 April 2018

27 March 2018

25 November 2017

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)