MediaWiki talk:Sp-contributions-footer
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | MediaWiki:Sp-contributions-footer appears at the bottom of Special:Contributions when the contributions of a registered user are listed. MediaWiki:Sp-contributions-footer-anon provides the same service for an anonymous user's contributions page. This interface message or skin may also be documented on MediaWiki.org or translatewiki.net. The page forms part of the MediaWiki interface, and can only be edited by administrators and interface editors. To request a change to the page, add {{edit fully-protected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request. Consider announcing discussions you add here at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) to bring more people to the discussion. |
Protected edit request on 15 January 2023
[edit] | This edit request to Template:Sp-contributions-footer has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add a link to Wikiscan as shown at Template:Sp-contributions-footer/sandbox, as I realise that it is much more informative than xtools. As a side request, another change in sandbox was to bring the two xtools links (edit counter & article counter) closer and sending "edit summary search" to the end. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 11:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @CX Zoom: please make all the changes you want here: MediaWiki talk:Sp-contributions-footer/sandbox, then reactivate the edit request above. — xaosflux Talk 19:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I just did, and fixed some dumb issues I initially made, thinking that MW namespace just works differently. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- There are some differences in design and types of information, but is there really a need for both Wikiscan and XTools? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Personally, I feel like having access to wikiscan would allow an user to go in-depth about their (or others) editing patterns and behaviour, compared to xtools, because wikiscan has lots more dissected data than xtools. Otoh, xtools has a really nice UI, and provides much of the basic information. Personally, I'd benefit from both links. Whether or not, it helps the overall community, I'm not very sure. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- No response so disabled for now — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- There are some differences in design and types of information, but is there really a need for both Wikiscan and XTools? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I just did, and fixed some dumb issues I initially made, thinking that MW namespace just works differently. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 24 March 2023
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove CentralAuth link from sp-contributions-footer. It is now available on Special:Contribs page by mw software. Thanks. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 06:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- The new MediaWiki link is under the page heading and says CentralAuth with a local link. We currently make both a local and meta link at the bottom of the page: accounts(meta). Many users may not notice the new location and link text. To avoid duplication but still link meta, keep it next to the other global links and help those who got used to the location, I suggest to only drop the local link and just say: accounts. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Not done if this was the only thing in the footer, I'd remove it - but it is in a location people are used to using (which is why even the 'local' link down there is still useful). — xaosflux Talk 18:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)