Jump to content

Acoustic ecology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See also: Soundscape ecology

Acoustic ecology, sometimes called ecoacoustics or soundscape studies, is a discipline studying the relationship, mediated through sound, between human beings and their environment.[1] Acoustic ecology studies started in the late 1960s with R. Murray Schafer a musician, composer and former professor of communication studies at Simon Fraser University (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) with the help of his team there[2] as part of the World Soundscape Project. The original WSP team included Barry Truax and Hildegard Westerkamp, Bruce Davies and Peter Huse, among others. The first study produced by the WSP was titled The Vancouver Soundscape. This innovative study raised the interest of researchers and artists worldwide, creating enormous growth in the field of acoustic ecology. In 1993, the members of the by now large and active international acoustic ecology community formed the World Forum for Acoustic Ecology.[3]

The radio art of Schafer and his colleague, has found expression in many different fields.[4] While most have taken some inspiration from Schafer's writings, in recent years there have also been divergences from the initial ideas. The expanded expressions of acoustic ecology are increasing due to the sonic impacts of road and airport construction that affect the soundscapes in and around cities where the human population is more dense.[5] There has also been a broadening of bioacoustics (the use of sound by animals) to consider the subjective and objective responses of animals to human noise, with ocean noise capturing the most attention. Acoustic ecology can also be informative of changes in the climate or other environmental changes since every day we listen to sounds in the world to identify their source such as bird, car, plane, wind, water. But we don't listen those sounds as a network, a mesh of relationships that form an ecology.[2] Acoustic ecology finds expression in many different fields that characterize a soundscape, which are biophony, geophony, and anthrophony.

World Forum for Acoustic Ecology

[edit]

The World Forum for Acoustic Ecology is an international collective of people and organizations who study the world's soundscapes.[6] There are eight groups that make up the World Forum for Acoustic Ecology: the Australian Forum for Acoustic Ecology, the Canadian Association for Acoustic Ecology, the Finnish Society for Acoustic Ecology, the Hellenic Society for Acoustic Ecology, the Japanese Association for Soundscape Ecology, the Midwest Society for Acoustic Ecology, Red Ecologia Acustica Mexico, and the UK and Ireland Soundscape Community.[6] Every three years since the WFAE's founding at Banff, Canada in 1993, an international symposium has taken place. Stockholm, Amsterdam, Devon, Peterborough, and Melbourne followed.[citation needed] In November 2006, the WFAE meeting took place in Hirosaki, Japan.[7] Koli, Finland, was the meeting place of the latest WFAE world conference[dead link‍].

Members of the WFAE, many of whom are recording artists and composers, are focused on improving the quality of public soundscapes through the design and planning of community spaces that preserve desirable sound while reducing noise pollution.[8] Acoustic ecologists value the exercise of listening as well as promoting a more conscious appreciation and awareness of one's sonic environment.[8]

Bioacoustics

[edit]

Noise is generally a by-product of increased urbanization and development. As our cities became more industrialized, the volume and frequency of anthrophony, man-made noise signals, increased.[9] Noise can alter the acoustic environment of aquatic and terrestrial habitats.

Animal biodiversity has shown to decline because of chronic noise levels in cities and along roadways.[citation needed] Musician and soundscape ecologist Bernie Krause relates biophony to an orchestra, where different groups of animals in an environment make sounds at different levels to avoid overlap or competition in their communication.[10] Manmade noise such as jets flying over a habitat can disrupt the natural order of these sounds, even putting certain species in danger of predators.[10] For example, some frogs synchronize in a way that protects individuals from attracting attention.[10] The noise of a jet can cause the frogs to stop or fall out of sync, temporarily breaking this effect and exposing them to other animals.[10]

On land, animal communication is shaped by physical characteristics of an environment such as distance, range of vision, weather, and surrounding noise.[11] The physical layout of a habitat may impede the spread of soundwaves while air conditions can affect sound quality and speed.[11] Animals can adapt to factors like distance by adjusting the frequency and amplitute of their calls to maximize communication effectiveness.[11] Some species such as the urban great tits have changed the frequency of their calls to adapt. Soundscapes of particular habitats are always evolving because the activities and species that exist in those habitats changes over time.[12]

In terms of evolution, man-made noise is a much more recent phenomenon. Indeed, through investigating collected recordings, ecologists can study ethology of animal acoustic communication, evolution, and development of acoustic behavior, relationships between animal sounds and their environment. However, all those ecological research goals have a precondition that those bioacoustic recordings are well investigated so that the animal species can be accurately recognized.[13] Scientific research has shown that it has potential to change behavior, alter physiology and even restructure animal communities.[14]

Soundscapes

[edit]

Soundscapes are composed of the anthrophony, geophony and biophony of a particular environment. They are specific to location and change over time.[12] Acoustic ecology aims to study the relationship between these things, i.e. the relationship between humans, animals and nature, within these soundscapes. These relationships are delicate and subject to disruption by natural or man-made means.[9]

In his book The Tuning of the World, Schafer used new terms like 'soundmarks' -- a specific community's distinctive sounds—and 'keynotes' -- prevalent but overlooked background sounds such as traffic—to help categorize the different elements of a soundscape.[15]

Biophony

[edit]

Biophony is the study of sounds emerging from animal sources, like whale vocalizations or birdsong.[16]

Geophony

[edit]

Geophony can be defined as the sounds originating from the Earth's natural processes, such as the blowing of wind or movement of waves.

Anthrophony

[edit]

Anthrophony is the soundscape defined by man-made sources, like speech or road noise.[17][18]

Research on the relationship between visual and auditory experiences in urban settings finds that the positive or negative visual perceptions of a landscape can directly affect the emotional assessment of the location's soundscape. A pleasant view or comfortable surroundings can increase people's tolerance and even appreciation for the sounds of an environment.[19]

People's preferences for noise control have been shown to differ based on the culture and technology of the time period as well as the familiarity or practicality of certain sounds.[20] For example, accepted sources of loud noise such as church bells or trucks may not bother a neighborhood as much as someone's new leaf blower, even if it is not as loud as more familiar sounds.[20] This is why it is considered difficult to generalize which sounds are unwanted in a community.[20]

Studying the soundscapes and traumatic impact of war has shown the effectiveness of noise as a psychological weapon to produce fear.[21]

Impacts of Man-Made Sound on Biospheres

[edit]

Aircraft activity has been a continuing development around the world and has some very good potential to change social-ecological systems. In Alaska, for example the communities are reporting that the aircraft disturb wildlife and negatively influence harvest practices and experiences. The limited data has some restricted knowledge about the extent of aircraft activity over traditional harvest areas. It is actually very impressive to see the amount of aircraft overflight around the rural subsistence, because the activity is increasing significantly and they have reached a median of 12 overflights per day near human development, which is six times greater than undeveloped areas. Therefore, those planes startle caribou prefer to avoid aircraft themselves, which has a result that they will need to go farther to do a better harvest, but this will occur in adding some costs for fuel, equipment, and the effort for sure. Those kind of examples help to understand the impact on social-ecological dynamics in Antarctica. [citation needed]

The ambient noise present within the world's oceans; geophonic, anthrophonic, and biophonic, has been identified as a critical indicator to the well-being of the regional biosphere.[22]

Acoustic niche

[edit]

The acoustic niche hypothesis, as proposed by acoustic ecologist Bernie Krause in 1993,[23] refers to the process in which organisms partition the acoustic domain, finding their own niche in frequency and/or time in order to communicate without competition from other species. The theory draws from the ideas of niche differentiation and can be used to predict differences between young and mature ecosystems. Similar to how interspecific competition can place limits on the number of coexisting species that can utilize a given availability of habitats or resources, the available acoustic space in an environment is a limited resource that is partitioned among those species competing to utilize it.[24]

In mature ecosystems, species will sing at unique bandwidths and specific times, displaying a lack of interspecies competition in the acoustic environment. Conversely, in young ecosystems, one is more likely to encounter multiple species using similar frequency bandwidths, which can result in interference between their respective calls, or a complete lack of activity in uncontested bandwidths. Biological invasions can also result in interference in the acoustic niche, with non-native species altering the dynamics of the native community by producing signals that mask or degrade native signals. This can cause a variety of ecological impacts, such as decreased reproduction, aggressive interactions, and altered predator-prey dynamics.[25] The degree of partitioning in an environment can be used to indicate ecosystem health and biodiversity.

List of compositional works

[edit]

"Dominion" by Barry Truax

[edit]

"Dominion" uses Canadian soundmarks that were made in different province by the World Soundscape Project at Simon Fraser University for an event of cross-country tour that happened in 1973. What is interesting about those sounds is that they are stretched over the time, so the extended versions allowed the people that listen to the sound in a more harmonic way. Those unique sound signals, were picked up by the live performers and then amplified to give the best experience possible to his audience.[26]

Archaeoacoustics

[edit]

This is a subfield of archeology and acoustics that in general study the relation between people and sound along the history. This is an interdisciplinary field that has methodological contributions from acoustics, archeology and computer simulation. Many cultures explored through archaeology were mostly focused on the oral, which lead the researchers to believe that studying the sonic nature of archaeological sites and artifacts may reveal new information on the civilization being scrutinized.[27] Marc E. Moglen (2007) recreated pre-historical Soundscapes (Acoustic Ecology) at University of California, Berkeley's Department of Anthropology, combining compositional techniques with site recordings for a non-diegetic piece in the virtual world of Second Life, on "Okapi Island" [citation needed]. At the Center for New Media the acoustic ecological setting of the former jazz scene in Oakland, CA was developed for a virtual world setting.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Wrightson, Kendall. "An Introduction to Acoustic Ecology" (PDF). WFAE. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 April 2014. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  2. ^ a b Paine, Garth (4 May 2017). "Acoustic Ecology 2.0". Contemporary Music Review. 36 (3): 171–181. doi:10.1080/07494467.2017.1395136. ISSN 0749-4467. S2CID 134270318. Archived from the original on 8 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  3. ^ "World Forum for Acoustic Ecology". Archived from the original on 11 December 2008. Retrieved 17 December 2008.
  4. ^ Cobussen, Marcel (2005). "Towards a "New" Sonic Ecology" (PDF).
  5. ^ "phonography.org". Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 17 December 2008.
  6. ^ a b "World Forum for Acoustic Ecology - Welcome!". World Forum for Acoustic Ecology. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  7. ^ "World Forum for Acoustic Ecology 2006, in Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan". November 2006. Archived from the original on 6 October 2008. Retrieved 17 December 2008.
  8. ^ a b England, Phil (March 2002). "Sharp Focus on Acoustic Ecology". New Internationalist (343): 33 – via Explora EBSCOhost.
  9. ^ a b Amor, Michelle G. (1 June 2021). "Ecologies of Sound and Sea: An Auditory Journey through Acoustic Ecology". EScholarship.
  10. ^ a b c d Krause, Bernie (2002). "The Loss of Natural Soundscapes". Earth Island Journal. 17 (1): 27–29 – via MAS Ultra - School Edition.
  11. ^ a b c Stein, Rachel M.; Rachlow, Janet L. (March 2023). "Acoustic ecology of terrestrial mammals: a new Signaller–Receiver Conceptual Framework". Mammal Review. 53 (3): 143–157. doi:10.1111/mam.12314. S2CID 257546978.
  12. ^ a b Weiss, Sarah G.; Cholewiak, Danielle; Frasier, Kaitlin E.; Trickey, Jennifer S.; Baumann-Pickering, Simone; Hildebrand, John A.; Van Parijs, Sofie M. (1 August 2021). "Monitoring the acoustic ecology of the shelf break of Georges Bank, Northwestern Atlantic Ocean: New approaches to visualizing complex acoustic data". Marine Policy. 130: 104570. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104570. S2CID 236254741.
  13. ^ "Bioacoustics - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics". www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
  14. ^ Shannon, Graeme (17 December 2015). "How noise pollution is changing animal behavior". The Conversation. Retrieved 28 May 2018.
  15. ^ Stefanovic, Ingrid Leman; Scharper, Stephen Bede (2012). The Natural City : Re-envisioning the Built Environment. University of Toronto Press. pp. 163–164. ISBN 9781442698024.
  16. ^ Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Rey Baquero, Maria Paula; Parcerisas, Clea; Seger, Kerri; Perazio, Christina; Botero Acosta, Natalia; Mesa, Felipe; Acosta, Andrea Luna; Botteldooren, Dick; Debusschere, Elisabeth (1 December 2021). "Comparison of Two Soundscapes: An Opportunity to Assess the Dominance of Biophony Versus Anthropophony". Oceanography: 62–65. doi:10.5670/oceanog.2021.supplement.02-24. hdl:1854/LU-01GKKAK0GC6J1F0A0S600HBJWW.
  17. ^ "Soundscape Ecology". Office of International Programs. 29 July 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
  18. ^ Lee, John, David Hicks, Danah Henriksen, Punya Mishra, William Cain, Chris Fahnoe, Jon Good, Sarah Keenan, Rohit Mehta, Carmen Richardson, and Colin Terry. "Historical Soundscapes for Creative Synthesis." TechTrends 59, no. 5 (2015): 4–8. Retrieved 2016-08-23.
  19. ^ Kang, Jian (2020). "Noise Management: Soundscape Approach1". Encyclopedia of Environmental Health. Elsevier Science & Technology. Retrieved 18 September 2023.
  20. ^ a b c Peterson, Ivars (December 1996). "Sounds of the Seasons". Science News. 150 (25/26): 400–401. doi:10.2307/3980071. JSTOR 3980071 – via Explora EBSCOhost.
  21. ^ Vuorisalo, Timo; Tucker, Richard; Laakkonen, Simo, eds. (2017). The Long Shadows: A Global Environmental History of the Second World War. Oregon State University Press. p. 191. doi:10.1353/book56054. ISBN 978-0-87071-880-9.
  22. ^ Wilford, Dylan Charles; Miksis-Olds, Jennifer L.; Martin, S. Bruce; Howard, Daniel R.; Lowell, Kim; Lyons, Anthony P.; Smith, Michael James (5 August 2021). "Quantitative Soundscape Analysis to Understand Multidimensional Features". Frontiers in Marine Science. 8. doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.672336. ISSN 2296-7745.
  23. ^ Krause, Bernie (June 1993). "The Niche Hypothesis: A virtual symphony of animal sounds, the origins of musical expression and the health of habitats". The Soundscape Newsletter. 6 (June): 06–10.
  24. ^ Sinsch, Ulrich; Lümkemann, Katrin; Rosar, Katharina; Schwarz, Christiane; Dehling, Maximilian (2012). "Acoustic niche partitioning in an anuran community inhabiting an Afromontane wetland (Butare, Rwanda)". African Zoology. 47 (1): 60–73. doi:10.1080/15627020.2012.11407524. ISSN 1562-7020.
  25. ^ Medeiros, Camila Ineu; Both, Camila; Grant, Taran; Hartz, Sandra Maria (1 February 2017). "Invasion of the acoustic niche: variable responses by native species to invasive American bullfrog calls". Biological Invasions. 19 (2): 675–690. doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1327-7. ISSN 1573-1464.
  26. ^ Dominion, retrieved 9 May 2022
  27. ^ Witt, David E.; Primeau, Kristy E. (3 August 2017). "Soundscapes in the past: Adding a new dimension to our archaeological picture of ancient cultures". The Conversation. Retrieved 9 May 2022.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Marcello Sorce Keller, "The Windmills of my Mind – Musings about Haydn, Kant, Sonic Ecology, and Hygiene", in Gisa Jähnichen and Chinthaka Meddegoda (eds.), Music – Dance and Environment. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press, 2013, 1–31.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acoustic_ecology&oldid=1246032111"