This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I know there are plenty of articles with incomplete {{Infobox Korean name}} templates, but if anyone could add Hanja, RR and/or MR names to the following articles, I would be terribly gratefull:
I removed some POV edit without clear evidence. [1]
In 1882, Korean ambassador Bak Yeong-hyo to Japan requested the Chinese government allow him to use flag of the Qing Empire as the flag of Korea, but was refused by Qing government.(??)
This edit and sources are very questionable(hoax?). Watch out this page.
이거 중국 인터넷에 널리 퍼진 날조고요. 그 소스 링크도 믿을 만한 것이 못됨. 원래는 마건충이 조선에게 청나라와 비슷한 국기를 사용하라고 했는데 고종황제가 이를 거부한 사실을 중국인 유저가 마음대로 상상을 넣어 날조했음.Newssports (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable)21:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I've already taken the liberty of adding C-Class to our project banner and assessment scale. I don't see any good reason not to use it, especially since it has been approved by the 1.0 Editorial Team. Other opinions are of course welcome. PC78 (talk) 21:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I've added a page for the recent film Public Enemy Returns, but do not speak Korean. If anyone could help double check the Korean title I entered, or any other specifics, I'd appreciate it!
Thanks --Gwythoff (talk) 18:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Request for photos
Dear Korean article writers and editors, have any of you by chance been to Baengnyeong Island? If so, please consider adding some photos to that article. It would be especially nice to have a photo of Changsan Cape, the nearby point of land in Ryongyon, North Korea, which is easily visible from Baengnyeong-do. Perhaps someone has already taken such a picture, or will take a trip to Baengnyeong-do in the near future. If so, any pictures would be appreciated! --Amble (talk) 04:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion; there's one image there that could be useful. There were some other possibilities pointed out at my talk page, so perhaps I'll try requesting one of those. Still, if anyone happens to go in the future, remember to take some photos! --Amble (talk) 03:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
I have proposed a Wikiproject workgroup on Sino-Japanese-Korean relations.
In my opinion, Wikipedia topics on Sino-Japanese-Korean topics all too often, and unfortunately, reflect the tense, exaggerated, embittered and often politically nationalistic debates currently prevalent in the popular presses of these three great nations.
In many case, these polemics are immature, propagandistic and unencyclopedic in nature and causes being promoted by unethical editing habits. Japanese-Korean topics appear to be amongst the more problematic topics on the Wikipedia.
At the same time, within each nation and academic circles there are moves to create pan-national understanding and document an accurate account of history. It is therefore proposed to establish a Sino-Japanese-Korean workgroup interested in establishing good working relations to improve the academic nature of these articles and encourage normal editing.
For the sakes of honesty and transparency, this pan-national workgroup was sincerely proposed precisely in response to the mode of operation used by many editors
Such wasteful activities as persistent allegations, personal attacks and other distractions from the primary activity of content production and reference checking only discouraging newcomers, less aggressive and, especially, genuine academics from participating on the Wikipedia. They undermine the goodwill of the Wikipedia.
It is hoped that by bring together authors from across the spectrum who are interested in rising above differences standards, understanding and sensitivity can be improved; just as they are in academia at present.
Your contribution is welcome. My apologies if it is not according to the protocols to make such announcements on other WikiProjects. --Ex-oneatf (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
How is this any different from the status quo? Would forming such a work group actually have any effect on how people behave? Which reminds me - please try to explain your edits at Korean war crimes. In fact, you cannot - the comments at the deletion poll all criticized you for writing the article in racist and nationalistic tone. I know there is this xenophobic nationalism in Japan that is deeply rooted in anti-Korean sentiments. (Ferromagneticmonopole (talk) 02:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC))
Well, you can also express your concern over the project propsal page since there needs more opinion on his intention for proposing it.--Caspian blue (talk) 02:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I meandered by Category:Korean dancers today, and found that nearly all the articles there are for K-pop artists. I figured the category was for actual dancers, like ballet dancers, classical dancers, even breakdancers if what they are known for is dancing...as opposed to people who happen to dance while doing other things like singing, like TVXQ. I love watching cute boybands dance and all, but do they really qualify as "dancers" in the sense meant by the category? --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 14:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't think so, though I guess dancers" can be defined fairly broadly. I too would expect the category to be used for "actual" dancers. Feel free to remove any articles you don't feel are appropriate. :) PC78 (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
That will empty out most of the category, but I'm sure there are relevant articles out there to help fill it again. I'm going to hold off to see what others have to say (just in case someone has an objection), but in the meantime could editors more knowledgeable about the subject be on the lookout for articles to add to the cat? --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 21:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Dokdo
anybody help? i can't edit Dokdo article.
i found some Wrong edit in article. But i can't change article.
Please can you help me this? how can i change this article?
1877 Daijō-kan order
In 1877, Japanese Daijō-kan issued an order stating that Ulleungdo and another island are not under Japanese rule [1][2]. Korea claims that this "another island" refers to Liancourt Rocks and considers this order as an evidence that Liancourt Rocks were under the control of Korea. Japan considers that this "another island" does not refer to Liancourt Rocks.
Japan was NOT considers that this "another island" does not refer to Liancourt Rocks.
Japan goverment never metioned that 1877 Daijō-kan order.
Japan goverment still NOT answer about this docment.
There is no official response to this document from mofa.go.jp(The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan).
so, Japan never says "another island" does not refer to Liancourt Rocks
and "antoher island" is currently Liancourt Rocks. This is very clear. This is not dispute at all. www.geocities.com/mlovmo/temp14.html
1905 Japanese Shimane Prefectural Notice No. 40
[...] Japan claims the incorporation was valid on grounds that Liancourt Rocks was a "terra nullius" and that Korea did not dispute the incorporation when the news was published. [...]
When we read the above article it’s immediately apparent there is no mention of Liancourt Rocks in Shimane’s “announcement”. In documents and maps both European and Japanese of this era Dokdo / Takeshima was almost exclusively referred to as “Liancourt Rocks”. The announcement is on the second page, without headlines, broken in half and little larger than a classified ad in the personals section. It’s not clear how many people actually read the San-in Shimbum in 1905. It’s highly unlikely the above ad was seen by many Japanese people, and was certainly not read by citizens of other concerned nations.
In 1906, Korean realized that Japan incorporate This island. and Ullengdo Goverment answer is "Dokdo has become Japanese territory is a totally unfounded allegation" [4][5]Korean cleary prostested this. so, This sentence is Wrong.
Post World War II era
[...] Government reply on the issue of sovereignty between South Korea and Japan, and it states that Liancourt Rocks are territory of Japan. (However, the current U.S. government stands on a neutral position on this issue.)
This is Wrong. User omitted other US goverment answer.
Here is the other document. This document is a memo entitled "Koreans on Liancourt Rocks" from the US Embassy, Tokyo to the US State Department, dated October 3, 1952.
"...The history of these rocks has been reviewed more than once by the Department, and does not need extensive recounting here. The rocks, which are fertile seal breeding grounds, were at one time part of the Kingdom of Korea. They were, of course, annexed together with the remaining territory of Korea when Japan extended its Empire over the former Korean State..."
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28788327@N05/2690801055/
"(a)Japan recognizing the independences of Korea, renounces all rights and title and to Korea, including the Quelpart, Port Hamilton, Dagelet, and Liancourt Rock."
1951.7.13 US goverment"
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28788327@N05/2690794949/
According to 1953.12.9 US docuement,
"[The] US view re Takeshima [is] simply that of one of many signatories to [the] treaty."
" The U.S. is not obligated to 'protect Japan' from Korean "pretensions" to Dokdo, and that such an idea cannot...be considered as [a] legitimate claim for US action under [the U.S.-Japan] security treaty
1951 Map (drawed by Japanese goverment 衆議院)
-Dokdo was Officialy exclude in Territory of Japan.
before 1953, Japan goverment did not recognized that Dokdo belong to Japan.
even Korea-Japan annexation period(1910~1945), Dokdo was classified as a part of Gangwondo, Korea.
After 1945, Korea liberation from Japan, Korea shortly govered by USFK and WW2 allied force. even that period, Dokdo was classified as a Korean territory.
Even 1951 Map (drawed by Japanese goverment 衆議院)
Dokdo was Officialy exclude in Territory of Japan.
Why can't you edit the article? I'm pretty sure that if you write this argument at the talk page in such disorder, you may be blocked. And do not expect others would take over it. You need to organize your argument and try to fix your writing first.--12:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Then, this newbie should read ArbCom rules in a green box at Talk:Liancourt Rock first. I noticed that this guy pasted the ame contents to several editors. Besides, Wikiepdia is managed by volunteer editors, so there is no obligation to take over his/her wish. The editor should clean up his own writing readable. "Somebody would do this or that for me" is not a good attitude for Wikipedians. --Caspian blue (talk) 17:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Can someone please take a look at this newly created article? I can't tell if this is a real subject or not. "Dokdo volunteered campaign" gets no hits on google other than Wikipedia. The article has a link, but it's in Korean so I can't read it. I would think that the dispute over Dokdo is already well covered in Liancourt Rocks. PC78 (talk) 07:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I see it's already deleted. It's a temporary fund-raising and advocacy campaign, and it doesn't seem necessary to have an article on it, or even to mention it in Liancourt Rocks. --Amble (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't object to it as such, but is this really necessary? Should we not be consulting the rest of the project first, to see if there is any interest in such a work group? Do we need a whole work group for just a handfull of articles? Shouldn't a work group be more than just one user acting on his own? PC78 (talk) 07:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I believe it is not necessary. Besides, this kind of controversial ones are pre-discussions with people essential. I request it for speedy deletion.--Caspian blue (talk) 09:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Elmor rus (talk·contribs) raises an issue that he think "we should" include the terrorist description on An Jung-geun as a terrorist. This has been a good example of long-time tendentiousness or edit warring among Japan-Korea related subjects. So any input from anyone interested in the subject would be appreciated. Thanks. --Caspian blue (talk) 14:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
If you're Korean, you would hear through various media that the writer past away today. He was a big tree in Korean literature, and influenced to Korean film, drama, and plays as well. Some of his works adapted into film are Seopyeonje (by Im Kwon-taek) and Iodo (Kim Ki-young). The article on him should have been made much earlier, but the stub needs more expansion, given the his contributions. Thanks. --Caspian blue (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Borrowed Scenery in traditional East Asian gardens
I was bold and moved the article "Shakkei and the picturesque", a title no one would ever search for or link to, to the far more common and straightforward "borrowed scenery". I have done a little to bring a more worldwide view (i.e. not just Japan) into the intro sentence, and added the East Asian languages template, to represent the different ways this term is pronounced in different languages.
A lot of work needs to be done to expand this out to cover the Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese (and other?) applications of this concept, not just the Japanese, and the Korean and Vietnamese words need to be added to the language template at the top.
I am no expert on this subject, especially not on the non-Japanese aspects/versions of it, and so I apologize for leaving it in this half-done state, and implore anyone with an interest and an expertise in traditional East Asian gardens to contribute whatever you can. Thank you. LordAmeth (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
(Translation): Can we just replace {{Infobox kdrama}} with {{Infobox Television}} on relevant articles? Because the two templates are overlapped a lot in function. If someone think that Korean name and Romanizations of a title should be attached, using {{Ko-hhrm}} would be a solution.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
An article tagged with the WikiProject Korea and WikiProject Vietnam banners has been suspected of being a hoax (or part thereof) on the grounds that a large part of it seems to be blatant pseudo-history. See Talk:Lý Long Tường for the discussion. If you have any points to make, then be sure to make your voice heard (however small or trivial they may be)! Otherwise, there is a real risk of a one-sided debate. David873 (talk) 10:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, everyone. How are you doing in the humid and scorching weather. If you want to cool off the heat as seeing cool images, there is a good place to please your eyes. At Patbingsu, several editors including Mindme (talk·contribs), me, and Badagnani have disputed over the inclusion of Mindme (talk·contribs)'s images to the article. The food is a very famous summer dessert comprised of red bean paste, shaved ice, fruits and others. Mindme's pictures have been included in the article[7][8], but better and diverse pictures come up. So if there is anyone want to see what patbingsu is and what images are presented on the talk page or meditating the dispute, please feel free to leave your input there. Thanks--Caspian blue (talk) 14:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
hi, i fist participate wikipfoject korea. i find some korean wannabe ID Hye-Hyun deleted massive deleted comfort women article. i think this user is a japanese. i recover it.[9] watch out this user. Masonfamily (talk) 20:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, actually the project is not only for Koreans, however the user reminds me of Komdori (talk·contribs). First of all, the name itself tells that the user is not Korean. Koreans do not use the hyphen and capital letter altogether for their name in Romanization. Either Hye Hyun or Hye-hyun or Hyehyun is commonly used. I've also never heard of the name, 혜헌. If he is a Korean, the name is like monk's name. Very peculiar name. Besides, Koreans do not say "안녕" for the first meeting to a stranger.[10] That is regarded very rude and uneducated. Even Korean-Americans (2nd or 3rd generation) who can't speak Korean at all say "안녕하세요" in such case. Aside from this, the user is whitebashing or distorting info on the article. That is a big problem.--Caspian blue (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Whether the user is Korean, or Japanese, or a Fascist Communist disguised as a Islamic Jew is beside the point and should not be used in the evaluation of his edits. Calling someone a 'wannabe' might be construed as a personal attack. But on the point of his actual edits, I agree that they are a problem. Konamaiki (talk) 21:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Im told they Ssaulabi were soldiers from Baekje, and Sungbyeong were Korean warrior monks, can anyone confirm this with a reliable source or something similar?
Jegal (talk) 02:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
I don't know about ssaulabi (I've never read about them from respectable sources, only hearsay), but seungbyeong is just a Korean word for "monk soldier." --Kjoonlee03:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
You think Sungbyong deserves to have its own article created? seeing as how they were figureheads in the Khitan wars to the Imjin war? Jegal (talk) 22:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
The following articles do not cover any pure numeral system where the symbols and notations are clearly defined, instead they cover how numbers are used in the respective languages. I have proposed all of them be moved. Please discuss HERE.
There is now a Korea-related featured sound, Image:박향림 오빠는 풍각쟁이.ogg. If anyone knows of any other Korean related sound files, we would love to have them. Please nominate them at WP:FSC.
Hi, I am so curious that I came to ask you what the upper comment means on this page. inner texts? what does it mean by? Pju0353 (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello, everyone. I seek some help to settle a dispute with User:Badagnani at buk (drum), Korean drums. My claim is that the buk is the term encompassing all drums used for Korean traditional music, while he insists that buk are exclusively referring to specific buk types (only drums affixed with "buk") used for pansori and samul nori in English speaking world. Yet, he has not provided any citations to back up his claim although he attached some sources from 국립국악원 and Grove Music Dictionary which only briefly refer to what 'buk' means. Any inputs on this are appreciated. Thanks--Caspian blue (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Certainly both the NCKTPA and New Grove Dictionary sources state that the term buk, in Korean, means "drum," but that the term is most often applied to the shallow barrel drum used to accompany pansori and in pungmul and samulnori. That is accurate and the article reflected it, then User:Caspian blue took it upon him/herself to unilaterally add all other types of Korean drum. The name of the drum used in samulnori, as nearly all English-language sources bear out, is simply buk, and the other drum used in samulnori has its own name which is "janggo." However, User:Caspian blue added the janggo and dozens of other Korean drums to the buk article, whereas description of these other drums belongs in an article entitled Korean drums--to avoid confusion with the specific drum that is actually called buk. Even more troublingly, User:Caspian blue added a long bulleted lest of all traditional Korean drums, but chose to remove the buk from that list. This is caused by a simple linguistic misunderstanding, by an editor whose first language is Korean, who presumes that if "buk" means "drum" in Korean, it must also mean "Korean drum" in English. However, as the NCKTPA and New Grove Dictionary sources bear out, the term buk is used in English to refer to the shallow barrel drum used in pansori, samulnori, pungmul, and a few other genres, whereas other traditional Korean drums, such as the famous janggu, are other than the buk and should have their own articles, or be described at Traditional Korean musical instruments or Korean drums. The buk article should describe the drum called buk, as the NCKTPA and New Grove Dictionary sources bear out. Badagnani (talk) 19:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This person has not provided actual "quotation" from the Grove Music Dictionary for his claim that buk is only exclusively referring to buk used to accompany pansori and in pungmul and samulnori in English speaking world. Please visit the page and read the article. FYI, his user has habitually introduced original research and false information to Korean related articles which have been all pointed out by several editors as opposed to his false labeling other's edits, so just only escalating the situation. --Caspian blue (talk) 19:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Would you kindly moderate your tone? The New Grove Dictionary is available in most good libraries, and is also available online. It confirms, in a bit more detail, the NCKTPA source which clearly explains the identity of the instrument called buk. That source may be found here. Note that another page of the NCKTPA's site, describing the hourglass drum called janggu, calls the instrument janggu and not buk. It describes the janggu, properly, as a form of drum and not "a form of buk." Badagnani (talk) 19:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Under culture, Arirang still needs to be looked at as Arirang most certainly does NOT translate to beautiful dear. Any Korean can confirm this. What i received was that its about going home and having a feeling of being home and the song simply refers to those who walk further away from home will have sore feet and not feel comfortable. I cant see to edit the talk page for this and this was the best place to put it, apologies for my lack of editing knowledge, however i feel its best we talk about it. CorrectlyContentious (talk) 08:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
FA review for Battle of Incheon
Battle of Incheon has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 01:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Korea-related
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot22:39, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Li Zhengji/Yi Jeonggi/Yi Jeong Ki
I'd like for interested Korean editors to take a look at the articles Li Zhengji, Yi Jeonggi, and Yi Jeong Ki. Right now, there is a proposal to merge them, but I see no good mergeable information and therefore have proposed Yi Jeonggi and Yi Jeong Ki for deletion. However, I am open to contrary opinions, particularly if there are reliable Korean sources either to confirm some of the claims in the article or at least discuss them in historiographical terms. Certainly they shouldn't exist as three separate articles. (The reason why I created Li Zhengji in the first place was because I didn't realize the existence of the other two articles given the complete lack of redirects and links from the related Chinese history articles.) --Nlu (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
It is tragic that the actress was deceased. Although I'd never been a big fan of her, she had been a South Korean sweetheart for 20 decades. However, her notable films are currently "red linked", so is there anyone willing to create articles on her works? In addition, I think her career section is very poor in present compared to the others, especially her death report. Aside from these, grammatical copy-editing is also deadly necessary, so any help from people is appreciated. Thanks.--Caspian blue (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Question, anyone knows what the meaning of 각시방 사랑 열렸네 (transcription: Gaksibang Sarang Yeollyeotne)? I haven't had a chance to see the TV drama and could not find any info on the title. Gaksi can be a maiden and "sarang" could be interpreted as "love", but what is "gaksibang"? Bang means " a room" so is it a maiden's room? If there is no "sarang", the title could be "The maiden's room is open", because of the "sarang", the title is implausible.....--Caspian blue (talk) 23:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Maybe there's no official English title. 열리다 can mean "to become open" but it can also mean "fruit forms on plant", so it probably means that love is blossoming in the bride's room. --Kjoonlee14:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I recently added an infobox template to this article, which contained both Hangul and Hanja text. Since I don't have a word of Korean, could someone give this a quick look to make sure I have added the correct text? Also, could you translate his pen-name of 'Ko-Dang' into Korean? Thanks! — BillCtalk14:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The article on the naming disputes deals with naming disputes of the body of water from historical/geographical point of view. However, Kusunose (talk·contribs) only removed a Korean map as insisting that the map is written in Korean (in fact Chinese character), and said the map has nothing to do with the international dispute. I think his rationale is not only absurd, but also contradictory to the historically involved dispute. Historical maps only from other countries are utterly absurd because the dispute is between Korean and Japan and so are history. I think the attempt is just to remove Korean point of view. Besides, he failed to provide related content for his relocation of the Ricci's map. Therefore, more people's opinion on this is appreciated. Thanks.--Caspian blueGwansim?01:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Kintetsubuffalo (talk·contribs) deleted massive information regarding Empress Myeongseong on the article of Korea under Japanese rule as falsely accusing that the contents have POV/Korean propaganda/biased/craps to be deleted. I also clashed with him at Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598) regarding the result of the war. He has neither provided his reasoning why the contents are as such nor participated in a discussion. But just making personal attacks and refusing to participate in a discussion for the matters. He even asked Sennen goroshi (talk·contribs) to delete more info from the articles and asked members of WP:WikiProject Japan to defend his position. It is unwise to delete the hard works built up by many editors. Perhaps, someone interested in the articles could participate in the dispute? --Caspian blue03:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I am making foreign relations of Korea although I just think to register my ID in this project. Hmm but my question is why the document foreign relations of South Korea has the banner of inappropriate tones. What would be possible to promote the quality of page itself...? Are there anyone to clarify me about it? Pju0353 (talk) 14:00, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
The answer is very simple. The blanking IP editor, 219.66.46.66 (talk·contribs) is a sock of indefinitely blocked Azukimonaka (talk·contribs) that lied about the "fact" just like his usual blanking campaign. So you can revert the page and add this reference.[14][15] Bakgoji (박고지) is more commonly used than bagogari (박오가리). Or you can try to move the title "Dried calabash strips" because preparation and cooking method are almost identical to both countries.--Caspian blue17:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi all. I was wondering if anybody would support a Template:Infobox Korean-language singer and actor like Template:Infobox Chinese-language singer and actor for Korean actors and singers. I want consistency and simplicity like many but I;ve noticed many of the articles don't have standard actor/singer infoboxes but have a transliteration box. Evidently somebody raised the concern years ago when Template:Infobox Korean Film was created which is specially used for Korean articles to include the transliteraitons in one. For instance Jo Yoon-hee, I think the box underneath looks out of place and would be much better as a parameter at the top of the top box. Also the infobox could be designed to incude Korean awards given to actors and singers which will display when required. Then there are articles like Ju Jin-mo which have large transliteration box but no actor box and it isn't consistent. Count Blofeld13:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
I've said some of this on your talk page, but since we're discussing it more publically I'll repeat some of it here:
There are many such articles – not just Korean ones – which don't have the actor infobox, and no reason at all why they can't simply be added. This aspect of your concern is not our problem.
You want consistancy, but how is it not consistant when these articles already use {{Infobox Actor}}? The way I see things, introducing new infoboxes for certain groups of actors (e.g. Korean) can only lead to a greater inconsistancy.
{{Infobox Korean film}} isn't really relevant here, but it's been around for years, and so far as I can tell there were no concerns raised which led to its creation.
With regard to {{Infobox Chinese-language singer and actor}}, there is at least an entire WikiProject (WP:CLE) that covers such articles. I don't think there's a big enough crossover between Korean actors and musicians that would require forcing these two things into a single infobox; on the contrary, many Korean actors seen to have a background in modelling.
If need be, Korean awards can be added to {{Infobox Actor}}.
I can't help but feel that you're trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist. The only inconsistancy I see in what you've said is between actor articles that have an infobox and those that don't, but one might as well point out the inconsistancy between an FA-Class article and a Stub. Actor articles that don't have an infobox just need them adding, nothing more. The belief that it looks out of place to use two infoboxes together is a rather subjective one. Creating a whole subset of Korean infoboxes which do little but add language parameters is not, I think, something to be encouraged; {{Infobox Korean name}} is by design supposed to be used alongside other infoboxes, which makes this unnecessary anyway. PC78 (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Your FA to stub analogy is completely redundant as an excuse. Articles like Ju Jin-mo have much better content than articles like Jo Yoon-hee yet the least developed articles actually has an actor box while the most developed one doesn't. You keep emphasising that you are using the actor infobox but I see you;ve edited Ju Jin-mo and have not used one but somebody has bothered to add a translation box. All I'm saying is if you have one infobox it kills two birds with one stone and avoids the inconsistency of either having one box or two. Count Blofeld17:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't think it's a redundant analogy; either way it is simply a case of the article being incomplete. So I edited Ju Jin-mo and didn't add the infobox, so what? If it bothers you that much then why don't you add it to the article yourself? I'm not under any obligation to do certain things whenever I edit an article. I hear what you're saying; what I'm saying is that there should be a more solid reason for creating a new infobox beyond mere aesthetics when the current setup works just fine. There is no inconsistancy in an article having just one or the other box, merely an incomplete article. What would be inconsistant is having the general Infobox Actor as well as the Chinese box, your proposed Korean box, and who knows what else in the future (Infobox Indian actor? Infobox Japanese actor?), all doing essentially the same thing. And when you want to lump different things like actors and singers into the same infobox, what happens then when someone like yourself comes along from WP:MUSICIAN and says "hang on, there's an inconsistancy here because you're not using {{Infobox Musical artist}}"? I get that you think a combined infobox would look nice and pretty, I just don't think there is a genuine need for one, nor do I think that you have looked beyond at the bigger picture. Sorry, but you came to me with this and this is what I think. PC78 (talk) 00:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Made some edits today regarding info from Samguk Yusa (which says in number (548) and text (26th year of reign)). Since 538 appeared now so often, I would like to make sure which is correct (or is both correct, but after some kind of different calendar?). Does someone else have a (non-online) source refuting/supporting that? Thanks, ----Erkan Yilmaz20:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
According to several online Korean encyclopedias[16][17], he made Sabi as the capital in 538 (16th year of his reign). Are you reading a primary source written in Classic Chinese or a translated source into English? --Caspian blue20:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Hmm.. according to an internet source, Samguk YusaSamguk Sagi clearly records the date in the 16th year of the King's reign.
十六年春; Spring in the 16th year of the king
移都於泗沘; The capital was moved to Sabi
一名所夫里; which was so call "Soburi"
國號南扶餘; The nation name was titled "Nam Buyeo" (South Buyeo)
Therefore there are three possibilities on this: the authors of the two books recorded differently on the date but Samguk Sagi is regarded more reliable by academics. Or the translators of your book made a mistake in translation or you may misread the passage? --Caspian blue20:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Caspian blue for your fast responses. Since the translation I have is so far the only one stating 548, I will revert to 538. ----Erkan Yilmaz20:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
It is reverted back to 538 as before. We can collect here different sources, translations, ... and then let's see further. 감사합니다 for your efforts Caspian Blue, ----Erkan Yilmaz20:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Maps
Currently, Korean cities are shown on provincial maps. But the place of the province in Korea is NOT shown on the city pages. This certainly should be done. Compare Anyang, China and Anyang, South Korea: It's easy for some-one not familiar with the provinces of China to see where the city is in the country/world; where-as placing the Korean city involves attempts at flipping back and forth to the province site. My suggestion: All Korean cities should include a map of the country in the same way Wik/Chinese cities do. Kdammers (talk) 03:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
I created the new stub regarding two French infants found dead in a freezer of Seorae Village, a French enclave of South Korea. My interest is not the field, so if anyone whose interest is criminology, please expand the article. Thanks--Caspian blue23:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
having maps in Sea of Japan naming dispute article
Isn't it odd that Sea of Japan naming dispute doesn't have any maps? Surprisingly, CorrectlyContentious who's arguing against adding maps to the page is a project member here. S/he'd be glad to have his/her fellow project members' opinions. Please voice your opinion on the talk page. (Ferromagneticmonopole (talk) 17:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC))
Good place to mention our talk Ferro, thanks for bringing it up on the main page as it is indeed a worthy look.--CorrectlyContentious 11:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
![[7]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/76/20080819124824!Korean_dessert-Patbingsu-01.jpg){kind=link}
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Korean_dessert-Patbingsu-02.jpg){kind=link}