Wikipedia talk:Twinkle/Bugs/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

TW-B-0102

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Resolved- This support is now provided as a gadget. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Support for modern skin (the easy way to do this would be to integrate my gadget, but checks could just as well be added directly to anywhere it's getting elements) —Random832 10:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

suggested fix: store a reference to whichever exists of bodyContent or mw_contentholder early on, and use that wherever document.getElementById('bodyContent') is being called now. —Random832 10:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0103 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

I have recently noticed (I have not previously checked) that my Twinkle comments do not show up on the talk page of registered WP persons which I revert with Twinkle. Example: [1] -- Boracay Bill (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0107 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

In twinklimagetravers.js line 34, I always get the error:

ReferenceError: Can't find variable: Namespace
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAzaToth%2Ftwinkleimagetraverse.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript 

This is strange in that "Namespace.IMAGE" is used in twinklexfd for instance, without a problem. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0112

Status:  Closed

Resolution: none- Duplicate of bug 13

When using unlink to remove backlinks to the article Sunset Boulevard (2008 film), which was deleted in accordance with the notability guidelines for future films, it appears to have chopped out half the article content from one of the linked articles, as seen here. Otherwise, great feature! All the best, Steve ^{T • C} 08:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0113 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

Copied from the helpdesk: AFD error

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/T%25u014Don-ry%25u016B#T.C5.8Don-ry.C5.AB

Twinkle exploded the page name for some reason. It is an Afd on Tōon-ryū. Also, this page needs to go away: T%u014Don-ry%u016B RogueNinja_talk 02:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

--TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0114 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When delinking images after deletion, doesn't always comment out the image breaking templates. For example, this diff commented out the image but broke the template. It shouldn't have commented out at the |Image= which may have not broken the template. MECU≈talk 18:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0117 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When applying a CSD template for an image, the template used on the image page itself links to the correct talk page, as indicated here. But the notice applied on the user's talk page is incorrect, as indicated here. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is due to the template {{Db-imgcopyvio-notice}} that uses {{db-notice}}. This db-notice template was not really ever designed to work outside articlespace it seems, which is now causing problems. It seems that most CfD and IfD warnings share this issue. So it is not really a problem in Twinkle, but it is something that needs to be fixed. I'm trying to think of a way to rewrite a parameter to it's talkpage variant, but I cannot think of any. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AzaToth, Random832 added both a "namespace", and a "targettalk" paramater to db-notice so that this issue can be solved. Its up to you to call which of those you prefer to use. The templates that use db-notice still need to forward those paramaters (but they are protected so I cannot help there). --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I think it's still under discussion as to which of the parameters should be used, and that needs to be decided before this is rolled out across the whole family of templated. your input would be helpful, since these parameters are much more likely, I think, to be used in semi-automated reporting. —Random832 14:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0119

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid- This is a problem with MediaWiki's cache of the page after the AfD notice is added. Purging the cache of the page will change the redlink to a bluelink. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

When using AFD for Rabio Lepus twinkle loaded everything correctly, and created the AfD page at the right name, however for some reason the link of the AfD tag on the article is redlinked? The AfD is hereWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabio Lepus and it is correctly linked to in TWs edit summary, but not on the AfD notice? SGGH ^speak! 10:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

It is correctly linked to in the users talk page notification too, just not the AfD tag SGGH ^speak! 10:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks like a simple caching/concurrency issue to me. The article was re-rendered before the AfD page was done being created. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0121 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When reporting a user to UAA, Twinkle says that a new report has been added to that page, but when I go over there to check, no report has been added. Blueboy96 17:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Try purging your cache. Oysterguitarist 05:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0123

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Won't fix- If a template should be speedied, then it probably isn't used anywhere, so there is no use in wrapping the speedy tag in a noinclude. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Does not place speedy tags in noinclude in the template namespace. —Random832 15:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

This is a pretty bad bug. Let me see if I can find it in code. — OranL (talk) 23:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

It looks like it happens in the function tagPage: function( self ) located in User:AzaToth/twinklespeedy.js. Every case has statements like the following:

code = "\{\{db-" +  self.params.value + "\}\}";

I'm pretty sure they should all go like this instead:

code = "<noinclude>\{\{db-" + self.params.value + "\}\}</noinclude>";

— OranL (talk) 00:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

• I fixed this by modifying var postData at the end of tagPage: function. Here's the modified code, and you can see how I'm using it in my monobook.js:

'wpTextbox1': "<noinclude>" + code + "</noinclude>" + "\n" + text

It will affect all CSD tags placed by Twinkle, but the noinclude tags shouldn't adversely affect anything even if they're put on pages outside of the main space.

— OranL (talk) 01:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0124 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

If two people warn a user at the same time, TW simply posts both warnings. Could it tell the second person about it? Examples here and here. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 04:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

AFAIK Twinkle says that the user has already been warned within last (time) - Do you still want to warn. Therefore, the user has a choice whether or not to re-warn the user. --The Helpful One ^(Review) 20:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Not in these cases. This is happening only with CSD, to my knowledge. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 01:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0127

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid- That option is a suboption of G3: Pure vandalism. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

In the popup for CSD's, one of the options is "G3: Pagemove", which suggests it could be used for cleaning up moved pages or old redirects. However it sends a nasty vandalism warning to the original contributor. Could the text for this be changed to "G3: Pagemove vandalism"? —BradV 17:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0128

Status:  Resolved

Resolution: Install Firefox 3 beta 5.

Rollback and warning functions don't work in firefox 3 beta 4. They worked fine in beta 3  superβεεcat  18:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

CSD is also not working. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 19:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This bug was reported on Firefox bugzilla. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 21:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I see. As per the bug report, using the trunk build (minefield) seems to solve the twinkle issue (mostly). Hopefully firefox 3 final won't have this issue. - superβεεcat  07:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The Mozilla Foundation released Firefox 3 beta 5 which resolve this issue. Carlosguitar ^{(Yes Executor?)} 18:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0130

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

I just used Twinkle to report User:Nichole:DD as a suspected sock puppeteer. The colon in the user name caused TW to create the report for User:DD instead. I have fixed the reports and user page notices etc, so no lasting problems. Not sure how often user names contain a colon so this may not be an urgent problem. Thanks.  – ukexpat (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0132 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

I just did an AfD, but twinkle only added the notice to the project page and notified the creator. The AfD tag did not get added to the article and the discussion did not get created. Aar☢n Bruce^Talk/_Contribs 14:59, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I presume this is bug 88. It was fixed yesterday, but a few people likely still have an old version of twinkle in their browser caches. :( --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Duly noted, fully reloading. Aar☢n Bruce^Talk/_Contribs 16:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Reloading my monobook did not fix this. I did this yesterday, but still will have the AfD tag on the article itself missing after all other steps completed successfully. DarkAudit (talk) 15:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0133 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

It seems that the unlinking backlink function is not working. I click the backlink button and all works fine. When I actually click "Submit query", all of the chosen backlinked article appear. Suddenly, they all turn green saying "Ignoring eventual redirect". Then they disappear a couple at a time. After they all disappear, then it is only one blue line that says "Unlinking image instances", followed by a percentage such as 4% or 6%. No matter how long I wait, the blue window stays up with that same line and the percentage does not change. If I close the box and check my contributions, nothing was done. Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 02:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Exactly the same thing here. Mozilla FF 3 beta 5, Windows Vista [if it matters]. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 09:56, May 3, 2008 (UTC)

Same problem here, does this feature even work? --Kraftlos (talk) 07:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post more details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0134

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

When I try to delete per CSD on a template the options for T2 and T3 are not listed (per Wikipedia:CSD#Templates.) Ctempleton3 (talk) 01:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0135 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When rollback vandal is used after User:SineBot has signed a vandal edit, TW opens SineBot's user talk page and leaves an edit summary stating that it has reverted vandalism by SineBot. It does not do this when ordinary rollback is used. I mentioned this below some time back but received no comments. Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 01:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Unlike #TW-B-0043 (open), I have not noticed a problem with TW failing to rollback past SineBot, only that it records an incorrect edit summary and opens the wrong user talk page.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 18:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0136

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid

I can't figure out why, but this thing reverted me and said "Period goes b4 cite." The thing is, the purpose of my edit was specifically fixing cites, putting periods before and not after, and removing spaces before them. Twinkle reverted the whole thing, restoring the exact problem it was apparently trying to fix. -- Ozzel (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Twinkle didn't revert you, Cirt reverted you, using Twinkle. Take it up with Cirt, this isn't a bug. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0137

Status:  Closed

Resolution: Duplicate of #TW-B-0128

Twinkle doesn't seem to be compatible with Firefox 3. While using it warning a user or reporting to AIV, the error "Could not read editform" or the like is given, however I think this is a compatibility issue because it only occurs in the new Firefox 3 (or it may be a FF bug). Thanks. PseudoOne (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Suggest installation of Minefield version. Carlosguitar ^{(Yes Executor?)} 23:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0138 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When using the "deli" tab (Batch image deletion from a category), the script will only delete everything if the number of files selected is evenly divisible by four. Otherwise, it deletes the remainder of that same division and stops. (So, in a category of 41 images, the script will delete only one file (the first one) and leave the rest; to delete those, I have to refresh the page and re-start the script, whereupon it works as intended). Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0139 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

If the "unlink all backlinks" option is unchecked for a deletion criteria that is set not to orphan all backlinks, the two cancel each other out and the backlinks are deleted. See this set of contributions for an example where links to an image on Commons were unlinked when I deleted the local description page per WP:CSD#G6 (see also my current monobook settings). --jonny-mt 01:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post with more details; if not, I will close this thread in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0140

Status:  Resolved

Resolution: ugly hack

Twinkle cannot properly handle the {{uw-username}} template. See examples [2] [3] for no text provided, and [4] [5] for attempting to provide a reason using the default text field. --jonny-mt 01:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

You'll note that your reason is before your signature, rather than where the reason should be. Apparently, according to a test I did to Example, the reason is actually the "linked article" field. nneonneo ^talk 20:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0141

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Dupe (bug 13)

If you look at this edit Twinkle removes a large section of the article in question when it was only supposed to be removing a dead back link as I had instructed it to do. If you need more info that that feel free to contact me at my talk page.--Mifter (talk) 12:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0142

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

Tagging a page for speedy deletion to merge history adds {{db-histmerge}} but there is nowhere to put the title of the other page in, so the tag appears broken [6], requiring another edit [7] to fix the tag. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 19:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0143

Status:  Closed

Resolution: Not caused by Twinkle.

Twinkle continues to add warned user's talk pages and userpages to watchlist even after configuration has been changed. The relevant part of my monobook.js file is as follows:

importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js');
TwinkleConfig = {
revertMaxRevisions              :       50,
userTalkPageMode                :       'tab',
showSharedIPNotice              :       false,
openTalkPage                    :       [ 'agf', 'norm', 'vand' ],
openTalkPageOnAutoRevert        :       false,
summaryAd                       :       " using [[WP:TWINKLE|TW]]",
deletionSummaryAd               :       " using [[WP:TWINKLE|TW]]",
protectionSummaryAd             :       " using [[WP:TWINKLE|TW]]",
watchSpeedyPages                :       [ ],
watchProdPages                  :       false,
openUserTalkPageOnSpeedyDelete  :       [ 'g1', 'g2', 'g10', 'g11', 'g12', 'a1', 'a7', 'i3', 'i4', 'i5', 'i6', 'i7', 'u3', 't1' ],
watchRevertedPages              :       [ ],
markRevertedPagesAsMinor        :       [ 'agf', 'norm', 'vand', 'torev' ],
deleteTalkPageOnDelete          :       false,
watchWarnings                   :       false,
markAIVReportAsMinor            :       true,
markSpeedyPagesAsMinor          :       true,
offerReasonOnNormalRevert       :       true,
orphanBacklinksOnSpeedyDelete   :       {orphan:true, exclude:['g6']}
};

So watchWarnings is set to false, and in the Twinkle documentation it states that watchWarnings is a boolean argument. However, even after setting and purging my browser's cache, Twinkle still adds warned users to my watchlist. —  scetoaux (T|C) 22:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Strange. It does this sometimes and not other times. I can't figure out why. —  scetoaux (T|C) 05:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I just figured out that this isn't caused by Twinkle. When the talk page is created due to a warning being given to a user, the page is automatically added to your watchlist. This is due to the wiki software, and can be disabled by going to My preferences -> Watchlist and unchecking "Add pages I create to my watchlist". —  scetoaux (T|C) 21:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0144

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid- The tool you are using is Friendly, not twinkle. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

With Safari 3.1, tagging pages does not work. No matter how many tags I select, when I click Submit I get a popup saying "You must select at least one tag!" Jfire (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Tagging with what? --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like Friendly's tagging feature. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0145 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

Using the delinker to remove images prior to deletion, the edit summary generated has a typo: "Removing instances of ... beacuse". Bencherlite^Talk 20:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please reply with more details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0146

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid- It seems you are having a problem with Friendly, not Twinkle. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 21:11, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Unable to tag a page no mater how many tags I choose to add it tells me you must select a least one tag. I am using opera as my browser. BigDunc (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply to my talk page comment, it is any tag such as wikify or notability or cleanup any of the usual tags.BigDunc (talk) 10:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Dupe of 144? nneonneo (talk) 02:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

What does that mean? BigDunc (talk) 11:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Right I see it now it is the same problem as 144 but with a diff browser.BigDunc (talk) 11:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I have tried it too with safari and it doesn't work either but it does with mozilla firefox just used it with no problems.BigDunc (talk) 16:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Have you activated JSL? _→AzaToth 13:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

No how would you do that.BigDunc (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Special:Preferences, Gadgets tab. Near the bottom is a checkbox for the JavaScript Standard Library, which should be enabled for IE, Opera and Safari. Let us know if that fixes it -- if it does, we can probably also close #144. nneonneo ^talk 20:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

It was already checked/activated.BigDunc (talk) 21:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Any movement on this bug? BigDunc^Talk 16:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

name: TypeError
message: Statement on line 1274: Could not convert undefined or null to object
Backtrace:
  Line 1274 of linked script http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAzaToth%2Fmorebits.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&smaxage=100
    var status = e.target.status;
  At unknown location
    [statement source code not available]

I get the following in my error console (with ALL xmlhttp actions apparently). --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0147

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Dupe (bug 13)

I've no idea what this tool is all about, but I assume it isn't supposed to delete a quarter of the article, as it did here. --Cherry blossom tree 10:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0148 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When warning users about edits made to images, an extra colon is prepended to the link, so that a colon shows up in the link text (e.g. [8], [9]). nneonneo (talk) 00:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

If it didn't do that, it would insert the actual image instead of giving a link to it. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The issue is that it adds *two* colons to the front, rather than just one. It is making links in the form [[::Image:image.png]]. nneonneo^talk 21:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, right, I didn't notice that. My apologies. --Closedmouth (talk) 00:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, I think I know (partly) what's going on: Twinkle prepends a colon for all wikilinks, then does "extra" handling to add another colon for images. That second part can probably be omitted, since the first colon is sufficient. nneonneo ^talk 20:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

One colon is added by the template itself, the other colon is added by twinkle. I guess this is from a time when the colons were not yet added by (all) of the templates yet. Before this is fixed we need to check which templates DO and which DO NOT add a colon on their own. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please reply with more details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0149

Status:  Closed

Resolution: withdrawn

Twinkle takes too long to tag articles for speedy deletion with reason: Unremarkable person. I'm using Firefox. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 08:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

It happened to me too, using Firefox 3.0pre as of April 11, 2008. Error console:

Error: [Exception... "'Component is not available' when calling method: [nsIHandlerService::getTypeFromExtension]"  nsresult: "0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE)"  location: "<unknown>"  data: no]
Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Gadget-popups.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript
Line: 68

followed soon after by

Error: self.params.normalized is undefined
Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAzaToth%2Ftwinklespeedy.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript
Line: 984

nneonneo ^talk 21:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Here's the strange part: despite the fact that the first message is about popups, disabling popups and force-refreshing doesn't seem to fix it; instead, the same message without the source file info comes up. nneonneo ^talk 22:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Just came here to report/check status on the same problem, using Firefox 2.0.0.13. -- Roleplayer (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

• I too am experiencing the same problem. Tomayres (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I think it's over. Clicking on it no longer results into the problem I described above. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 17:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0150 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When using xfd to nominate an article for deletion Twinkle did not list the page on the daily log. It did complete the other three tasks though. I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.13. Roleplayer (talk) 23:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0151

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Won't fix

When I am on my user page, talk page, and subpages, pressing alt+shift+r doesn't forward me to recent changes. Instead, a dialog box appears. It reads, "You don't want to report yourself, do you?" Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

What browser? I'm using FF 3.0pre and it works for me (shows RecentChanges) (by the way, thanks for reminding me to learn keyboard shortcuts). I'm sure someone can find a valid use for turning themselves in at WP:UAA ;) nneonneo ^talk 21:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.14. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 07:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

I use the same Firefox version as you and can confirm this. Interestingly, the first time I browsed to my talkpage in this session, it worked as it should, opening a new tab with recent changes. However, at all subsequent attempts, it gives me the warning box you mention. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 20:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah! I have gotten the same result. -ĤéĺĺвοЎ (talk) 02:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Seems to be a mismatched accesskey?  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post more details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 21:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

No, this is still current. The accesskey for recentchanges conflicts with the access key for warning users.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 06:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Mike, ALT-SHIFT-R works for me when I am on my userpage and have your monobook.js imported. Are you using Firefox 2 as well? Any chance someone could switch from FF2 to FF3 and see if the problem goes away? Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

I've got FF3.0.4 currently & not getting an error. I recall I used to get this error, and had always assumed the accesskey conflict explained that behaviour. When it stopped, I figured someone must have fixed the script, but I guess it may have been upgrading FF.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 04:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

As you said, I think it's a problem with something other than Twinkle, since the scripts don't set access keys. I'm glad that upgrading fixed the problem. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 14:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0152

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

When reporting a user to AIV, one of the checkbox options reads Vandalism after recent release of block. When the report is generated, however, it reads Vandalism directly after release of block. This has led to at least one of my AIV reports being denied, as the vandalism was not immediate. Personally, I'd prefer the "recent" wording, as that would be useful more often. In any case, the text needs to be synchronized. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 16:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC) importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js');

I also noticed this and I agree. It should read 'recent', not 'directly'. Enigma ^message 07:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0153

Status:  Closed

Resolution: wait four days

I am trying to install twinkle by pasting this into my monobook, but nothing happens in any browser, even when I clear the catch. What am I doing wrong? importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js'); TwinkleConfig = {

       revertMaxRevisions              :       50,
       userTalkPageMode                :       'window',
       showSharedIPNotice              :       true,
       openTalkPage                    :       [ 'agf', 'norm', 'vand' ],
       openTalkPageOnAutoRevert        :       false,
       summaryAd                       :       " using TW",
       deletionSummaryAd               :       " using TW",
       protectionSummaryAd             :       " using TW",
       watchSpeedyPages                :       [ 'g3', 'g5', 'g10', 'g11', 'g12' ],
       watchProdPages                  :       true,
       openUserTalkPageOnSpeedyDelete  :       [ 'g1', 'g2', 'g10', 'g11', 'g12', 'a1', 'a7', 'i3', 'i4', 'i5', 'i6', 'i7', 'u3', 't1' ],
       watchRevertedPages              :       [ 'agf', 'norm', 'vand', 'torev' ],
       markRevertedPagesAsMinor        :       [ 'agf', 'norm', 'vand', 'torev' ],
       deleteTalkPageOnDelete          :       false,
       watchWarnings                   :       true,
       markAIVReportAsMinor            :       true,
       markSpeedyPagesAsMinor          :       true,
       offerReasonOnNormalRevert       :       true,
       orphanBacklinksOnSpeedyDelete   :       {orphan:true, exclude:['g6']}

}; Antivandalblaster (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

You have to be autoconfirmed, and that takes five days or something to happen. --Closedmouth (talk) 16:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0154

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

Speedy deletion nominations via Twinkle are no longer automatically signing the nominator when notifying the article creator. See Here for one example. This has only started happening recently. I use Firefox 2.0. Stephenb (Talk) 18:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I can confirm this is happening as well. I am using Firefox 3.0pre, from April 22 (two days ago). nneonneo ^talk 19:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0155

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

When reporting sockpuppets, the edit summary when Twinkle notifies the suspected sockpuppets and sockpuppeters is "Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppertering." Just a minor typo, but I thought it should be brought up here. —  scetoaux (T|C) 21:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Line 659 in User:AzaToth/twinklearv.js to make it easier to fix ;) nneonneo ^talk 21:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

While we're on the topic of spelling errors, "receive" and various derivations of the word ("received", "receiving", etc.) are misspelt in many places as "recieve", etc., particularly in twinklefluff.js. nneonneo ^talk 03:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0156

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

Warning a user about adding useless trivia resulted into this. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

This uw template has been deleted. Ergo, it needs to be removed from Twinkle. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0157

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Dupe (bug 13)

Attempting to use Rollback (Vandal) deleted most of a page Enigma ^message 07:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, I looked at some older bug reports and this appears to be a known issue. Very worrisome, regardless. Enigma ^message 07:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Yep, dupe of bug 13. It happens. nneonneo ^talk 07:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0158

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

Recent change to morebits.js broke compatibility with popups -- the navigation popups use the same Cookie object, but with different method names - create, read, erase instead of set, get, del (see MediaWiki:Gadget-popups.js, lines 2577 to 2608). Please revert that change, call the Cookie var something else or provide compatibility names. nneonneo ^talk 21:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0159

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Fixed

As of today, Twinkle appears to have stopped working in Safari. None of the tabs show up, rollback is no longer available, etc. Apparently, it also no longer works on Opera though I haven't verified this myself). Firefox seems to be fine. Klausness (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I am an Opera user and it is not working. BigDunc (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Also not working in Firefox 1.5.0.7. nneonneo ^talk 19:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Havn't done anything really, and it works just fine here in FF 3.0b5 (and in 2.0.13 earlier today. _→AzaToth 19:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

For Safari, there was a parse error due to the usage of the word delete. This is now fixed. If everyone can try to clear their cache and verify if twinkle works for them again, then that would be helpful. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I cleared the cache and Twinkle is back in Opera. BigDunc (talk) 19:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

It's back in safari, too (after a cache clear). Thanks. Klausness (talk) 10:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

And now it's gone again (in Safari). Is Twinkle twinkling? Klausness (talk) 14:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0160

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

I just removed some vandalism from my talkpage - an abusive comment by an anon user, which was signed by SineBot. This of course means that SineBot was the last contributor, not the vandal. When doing the "revert vandalism" routine, Twinkle told me that the last edit was by a whitelisted contributor (SineBot) and that it instead assumed that I wanted to revert the contribution by the last editor prior to SineBot instead. Which is of course correct. However, the edit summary still displays information that I'm removing vandalism by SineBot. This should probably be changed to the proper username / IP address of the actual vandal. And, perhaps more importantly, the talkpage that was automatically opened was that of SineBot, not of the vandal. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 16:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

No update on this? Can others confirm? -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 08:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

This issue is still on-going. It is properly reverting, but it is still saying it reverted vandalism by Sinebot and opening Sinebot's page[10]. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Can you please provide some diffs? Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I did? I can't provide a diff showing it opened sinebots page, but that one shows it reverting 67.158.120.210's edit but saying it "Reverted 1 edit by SineBot".-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

D'oh! Don't know why I didn't see that diff. I'm looking into it right now. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I think I've fixed it. It looks like for vandalism warnings the user wasn't set properly if a bot edited after it. Let me know if the problem is still occurring, but I think it should be good. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0161

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

When I report an offensive name to WP:UAA using Twinkle, there is a grammatical error: Violation of username policy because it's a offensive username. The correct statement should be "Violation of username policy because it's an offensive username" but without the italics. Johnny Au (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, this was somewhat difficult to do correct, but I'm makiing it somewhat correct, and if the first letter is vowel or 'h', I use 'an', else I use 'a'. _→AzaToth 23:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I reported another offensive username and the same grammatical error came up. Johnny Au (talk) 04:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0162

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

As seen in this diff, when I used the "ARVarv" tab on Special:Contributions/202.173.156.210, Twinkle inserted text including "{{IPvandal|User_talk:202.173.156.210}}" instead of the proper "{{IPvandal|202.173.156.210}}".   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I noticed your edit summary on AIV, as "Hm, bug in Twinkle?". I assume you were referring to the fact that Twinkle reported the user's Talk page instead of the user's name. I've had the same problem with Twinkle and this started two days ago. In the months before it worked fine. I'm seriously puzzled.  Channel ®    23:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

(copied from this edit to my user talk page)   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing it!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0163

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

When warning a user, uw-username is included. However, the nature of that template requires to input {{{1}}}. When just adding it as usual, it tells the user NO REASON GIVEN. However, when giving an article, that submits the parameter, but the edit summary provides a link to the reason. Soxred93 (u t) 03:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0164

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid- Not a bug, user setup problem. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I can't use Twinkle with this skin! Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 06:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Go to your preferences, click on Gadgets, and check the box designated "Compatibility function to run scripts only tested on Monobook on the new Modern skin. etc." near the bottom. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0165 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

I can no longer get the vandalism rollback feature to work on Safari. It worked until about two weeks ago, but now it always stalls at Info: Open user talk page edit form for user xxx. I have popup blocking turned off and I have the javascript standard library installed. I've also tried to turn off the talk page opening entirely by setting the openTalkPage preference to [], but that didn't help (even after clearing the browser caches and restarting Safari). Klausness (talk) 21:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post new details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0166

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

There seems to be a js error in the batch deletion module: While trying to delete the pages linked in my sandbox, my debugger caught this:

in index.php (line 164) - twinklebatchdeleteCallbackEvaluate(submit )
pages has no properties:
   var work = pages.chunk( TwinkleConfig.batchdeleteChunks );

-- lucasbfr ^talk 15:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Array.prototype.chunk is defined morebits.js, perhaps pages is null here, can you confirm that? _→AzaToth 15:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Working perfectly, thanks! -- lucasbfr ^talk 08:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0167

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed- Input boxes that do not apply for the currently selected block template are now disabled. Maybe I'll get ambitious and do the same for the rest of them someday. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

When I use Twinkle to add a block message for {{uw-voablock}} (Blocking/Vandalism-only), I receive an option for entering "Period of blocking", but when the message issues, it says "indefinite block" instead of the time that I entered. As a related feature request, it would be really nice if I could get a "Preview" option for warn/block messages, so I knew what it was going to look like before I clicked "Submit". :) --Elonka 04:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0168 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When Twinkle is used to remove backlinks to deleted pages, it is also removing the links on redirects to the deleted articles. I have come across two pages so far today with content of "#REDIRECT deleted-article" as Twinkle removed the brackets. These redirects need to get deleted (which would happen via broken redirect maintenance if left alone) and not turned into bogus pages. The backlinks function needs to check if the page is a redirect and either leave it alone or tag it for CSD R1. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post new details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0169 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

Twice now, when I tried to nominate an article for deletion with Twinkle, it would add the section to the proper AfD page, tag the article and creator's talk page, but it wouldn't actually create the discussion page under AfD. i.e Say I nominated "Article" for deletion. It would do everything right except it wouldn't create the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Article page.  AcroX  16:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post new details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0170 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When deleting images, TW no longer removes instances of that image on article pages, even when the box is ticked. May have been reported already, I did try to look. Regards, SGGH ^speak! 19:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I've noticed that too, it's been like that at least a couple of days too, at least when using Opera 9.27. --Sherool (talk) 20:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please post new details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0171

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Dupe (bug TW-B-0013)

Unconfirmed as yet report that issuing a warning via WP:TWINKLE nuked the contents of the talk page beyond the warning concerned, see current last message on User Talk:Sfan00_IMG Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks like bug 0013, which was fixed on the 26th of June. nneonneo ^talk 20:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0172

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Works for me- There doesn't appear to be a malfunction in the script code. If you're still experiencing the problem, please post on WT:TW for support. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 22:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I have been getting reports from several users that when an article is about to be nominated for CSD, when the users select the radio button for CSD, it doesn't submit automatically, it just sticks there. Or was there a new feature implemented (like a submit query button?) that wasn't on there? Thanks. BoL (Talk) 04:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

What browser? nneonneo ^talk 19:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0173

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

Got this after an attempt to warn that user about a racially-motivated edit at the sandbox. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

uw-ra seems to have been deleted, removed now here as well. _→AzaToth 12:58, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0174

Status:  Closed

Resolution: withdrawn

Help! I can't see all Twinkle functions beyond special pages! Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC) After all, it just seemed to work back. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 13:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0175

Status:  Resolved

Resolution: Removed interfering code

I've got the full install using Firefox, and my xfd tab is gone. Happens in both edit and read mode, and for all namespaces. Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 20:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

And now the prod tab is gone! What in the heck is going on? ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 18:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

And now the csd option is busted. The window opens, I tab a circle, nothing happens. I'd really appreciate some help, here. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 02:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks like some of the other code on my monobook.js page was causing problems. I removed them, and now it works fine. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 20:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0176

Status:  Resolved

Resolution: whoops

In User:AzaToth/twinklebatchdelete.js, line 153, in the function toCall inside the function twinklebatchdeleteCallbackEvaluate, there is an extra closing parenthesis. This generates the following syntax error in Firefox 3.0 (running on Windows XP SP2):

Error: syntax error
Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&title=User%3AAzaToth%2Ftwinklebatchdelete.js
Line: 153, Column: 122
Source Code:
  if( work.length == 0 &&  twinklebatchdelete.currentDeleteCounter <= 0 && twinklebatchdelete.currentUnlinkCounter <= 0 ) ) { 

Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 22:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0177

Status:  Resolved

Resolution: Somebody had deleted the example line from WP:UAA that TW uses as its anchor for adding a report

The option in ARV tab to report a username is not working correctly; it does not appear at WP:UAA and the window shows "Status: batch deletion is now completed". --Snigbrook ^(talk) 12:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Restored the anchor line to WP:UAA and all seems well now.Mayalld (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0178

Status:  Closed

Resolution: not a bug

Must be a common bug, or at least it is for me. Whenever I nominate articles for deletion (which I do often) using this feature, it automatically adds a tag that reads <!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page="Example Page"|date="Example date"|result='''keep'''}} --> even if I just opened the nomination. This can be seen here or here. It really isn't the end of the world, but it's quite annoying that I have to remove that when I feel like it's something that could be easily solvable. Thanks Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 23:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Why do you feel the need to remove it? This is a commented out piece of code that is placed there for the benefit of the closing admin to use or not as suits him. It doesn't appear in the rendered version, so what is the issue? Mayalld (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, the same comment appears even when you tag the page manually with {{subst:afd}}. The original proposal for that feature is at Template talk:Afd#Proposal to include {{oldafdfull}} boilerplate text. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0179 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

At least three times in a row now, I have tried to get an article deleted, either by adding a CSD tag or an AFD tag. In the past three cases, the process has hung at the Notifying of initial contributor (): data loaded... step, which never completes. In one case, this led to a malformed AFD which I corrected manually. Most recently, the correct CSD tag was placed on the page, but the author was not notified. In all cases, the status window remains on the page. I'm using Firefox 3 with the modern skin. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 01:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Similar issue to above - doesn't complete the AfD process, but only sometimes. Using Firefox 2. Latest incident was West Parish Elementary School and its AfD. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed (just experienced same issue using FF3). _→AzaToth 20:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Just tried to xfd John Holmes (football player). Using FF3 on Ubuntu Hardy. The process went through it's paces, but the only step actually completed was notifying the author. I had to do everything else by hand. DarkAudit (talk) 18:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

And again on Day By The River. I made sure that en.wikipedia.org was an allowed popup. Made no difference. Only the notification of the original author was successfully completed. DarkAudit (talk) 18:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Is this issue still occurring? If so, please reply with more details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0180

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Won't fix- Internet Explorer is an unsupported platform. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Having to use IE (ugh) for once. This PC has version 6. Most of the functionality seems to be working, but when I try to warn users for being naughty boys (or girls), it's telling me my account is too new. I'm guessing you know about this problem, but just in case... Dweller (talk) 10:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Ditto. Normally I use Twinkle on Firefox without issue. Is this simply an issue of my use of IE?--E8 (talk) 01:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0181

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid- This is not a bug, just the MediaWiki software having a cached version of the page. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 22:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Botn User:Tenacious D Fan and I seem to have trouble with the AfD template. It will properly finish the AfD process, but when it comes to placing the template on the actual article, it acts as if an IP has placed the AfD template (such as this diff), and the discussion ends up red linked in the template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Chirps•Clams•Chowder)} 18:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Step one: install the purge clock (prefs -> gadgets -> "A clock in the personal toolbar that shows the current time in UTC and also provides a link to purge the current page"); step two: click said clock when you see such a red link. The problem is the fact that the page creation doesn't propagate instantly, making it necessary to manually purge the page. nneonneo ^talk 19:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I have seen many posts about this at the help desk and elsewhere, for example [11]. Would it be practical to insert a small delay before placing the template? PrimeHunter (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0182

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Invalid

On Safar 3.1.2, when I use the arv tab everything works fine, except the 'Evidently vandalism only account' checkbox is disabled. don't know if that's intentional, or a bug, or a 'feature' that I don't know about, but I thought I'd make a note of it. Ludwigs2 21:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

• I've noticed that it's always disabled when I report an IP, and enabled only when I'm reporting an actual user. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Chirps•Clams•Chowder)} 21:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
  • That would make sense, seeing as IPs are not accounts. nneonneo ^talk 21:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
    • lol - that would make sense, wouldn't it.  :-) --Ludwigs2 19:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0183

Status:  Resolved

Resolution: add config entry

On Firefox 3.0.1, the CSD tab displays the reasons as usual. When I pick one, nothing happens, and the box stays up on the page. Found when trying to CSD Klean Blast Seal. --Tckma (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I can't reproduce it. Anything in your Error Console? (Tools->Error Console or Ctrl+Shift+J) nneonneo ^talk 15:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

When I select the reason, I get the following error message in the console:

Error: TwinkleConfig.notifyUserOnSpeedyDeletionNomination is undefined

Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=raw&ctype=text/javascripttitle=User%3AAzaToth%2Ftwinklespeedy.js

Line: 1091

--Tckma (talk) 17:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

It *should* be set on line 43. What happens if you add

notifyUserOnSpeedyDeletionNomination: [ 'g1', 'g2', 'g3', 'g4', 'g10', 'g11', 'g12', 'a1', 'a2', 'a3', 'a5', 'a7', 'i1', 'i2', 'i3', 'i4', 'i5', 'i6', 'i7', 'i8', 'i9', 'u3', 't1', 't2', 't3', 'p2' ]

to your TwinkleConfig? Also, have you tried shift+refresh or cache-clearing? nneonneo ^talk 17:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I put that line in my monobook.js and did a CTRL-SHIFT-R. It works now. --Tckma (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0184 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When Twinkle was protecting Xbox, it removed the protection tag ([12]). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Has this issue occurred again? If so, please post new details; if not, I will close this bug in a few weeks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0185

Status:  Resolved

Resolution: template fixed

Speedy deletion notices are inserting a space on a new line before user's signature. See example here Toddst1 (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

this edit should fix the problem. nneonneo ^talk 06:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0186 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

AfD nomination made through Twinkle was incomplete. See a Bot complete it for me. Dweller (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Do you know what part of the AfD nomination was incomplete? Did the bot have to list it on WP:AFD for you or was it something else? Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 22:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0187

Status:  Closed

Resolution: none- Not a Twinkle bug.

An IP vandalized Cardcaptor Sakura[13] however when I used twinkle to rollback as vandalism, it replaced the entire article with the contents of 2008 New England Patriots season[14] (an article I have never edited). How on earth could that have happened? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

This happened to me as well[15], but I wasn't using Twinkle. I assume it was a Wikipedia software problem. -- JLaTondre (talk) 03:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that was almost certainly Wikimedia bug 14933. Closing this bug. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0188

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Works for me- There doesn't seem to be a malfunction in the code here. If you are still experiencing the problem, please post on WT:TW. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 22:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Because I patrol recent new pages, I sometimes encounter ones that qualify for CSD. However, when I click the CSD criteria it falls under, nothing happens. I know that in this function, when you click on the criteria for CSD, it automatically submits the template. Is there something I can do to fix it? or is there something that may be intercepting with it? S_RX 15:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0189

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

See this, which is caused by the lack of a capital "D" after the colon. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 16:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

You mean capital "T", right? The (presumably) intended template is {{db-T3-notice}}. I'm not sure why it's capitalized, given that {{db-t3}} itself isn't, but... —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes you are correct it was the "T" and now I fixed the problem by creating the redirect Template:Db-t3-notice. However, I notice that it still does not appear on the Burgundavia link above but did in a test edit in my sandbox. Ah, well then I suspect that at this point it is no longer a Twinkle bug but something else. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 21:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't think MediaWiki retroactively processes subst: (AFAIK this is something that is done when the edit is made, not when the page is shown). Thus, the old edit will continue to maintain that incorrect text. According to Category:CSD warning templates, though, the template should have a better name than "T3". Something like db-unusedtemplate-notice is probably appropriate. A redirect should also be created from {{db-unusedtemplate}} to {{db-t3}} and then Twinkle updated to use that name instead (it's the only one in twinklespeedy.js where the CSD code is used instead of a short name). Any thoughts? nneonneo ^talk 21:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0190

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Won't fix

"You have been blocked for violation of the 3RR rule." Quick, what does the second "R" stand for? --NE2 10:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't see a problem here. The phrase "3RR rule" is commonly used on Wikipedia. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I have also seen phrases like "User X is on 6RR" meaning that they had done 6 reverts on a page in 1 day.

Similar things (where part of the meaning of an abbreviation gets lost) can be found in referring to living people as BLPs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0191

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed- All of these typos have now been fixed. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Grammar/typo/style patrol: If you disagree with any of these suggestions, please ignore them and close the bug.

• twinklefluff.js:
  • "respons from the server" -> "response from the server"
  • "Latest revision is made by" -> "Latest revision was made by"
  • "is choosen" -> "was chosen"
  • "We where to revert" -> "We were to revert"
  • "Open user talk page edit form" -> "Opening user talk page edit form"
• twinklewarn.js:
  • "Choose first the main group you want to issue, then choose an appropriate type to issue." -> "First choose a main warning group, then the specific warning to issue."
  • "Will you still add a warning/notice?" -> "Do you still want to add a warning/notice?"
  • "reloading talk page in some seconds" -> "reloading talk page in a few seconds"
• twinklearv.js:
  • "Select wanted type of report:" -> "Select report type" or "select required type of report"
  • "Leave blank for no linked page in report" -> "Leave blank to not link to the page in the report"
• twinklexfd.js:
  • "a default choice is choosen" -> "a default choice is made"
  • "Image have disputed source" -> "Image has disputed source"
  • "Tagging article with deletion tag" -> "Adding deletion tag to article"
  • "Nomination completed, redirecting now to the discussion page" -> "Nomination completed, now redirecting to the discussion page"
  • "todays" -> "today\'s"
  • "Notifying of initial contributor" -> "Notifying initial contributor" or "Notification of initial contributor"
  • "failed to find target spot to add the discussion to." -> "failed to find target spot for the discussion."
  • "which have been listed on" -> "which has been listed on"
  • "Quering allpages" -> "Querying allpages"

Some of these occur in more than one place, by the way. --Slashme (talk) 10:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Another typo, also in twinklexfd.js: there is "This redirect has been listed on [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]\]\]." which results in an extra "]]" after the link in the edit summary[16]. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 22:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

That redirect has been deleted; this is one that still exists (although the redirect was retargeted): [17]. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 21:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment about other suggested changes: most would be improvements, not sure about this one:

• "Leave blank for no linked page in report" -> "Leave blank to not link to the page in the report"

The existing version of this looks clearer to me. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 22:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Another suggestion, this time in twinklebatchdelete.js (not sure what this is, but it is the only place I can find the text I mentioned in TW-B-177):

• • "batch deletion is now completed" -> "batch deletion is now complete" or "batch deletion has now been completed". --Snigbrook ^(talk) 23:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0192

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

I just noticed that when tagging paged for CSD the first A7 option (Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content) places the DB-bio template which is only valid for individuals. Perhaps this should be switched to the generic DB-A7 template, or the description text should be updated to reflect this. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 16:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I think that the correct approach is to have multiple drop-down menu entries for A7, one for each sub-category, so the most specific tag can be inserted. See Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Can_some_admin_fix_the_template_for_A7.3F. VG ☎ 17:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy tags have all been updated. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0193

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

I was putting a welcome template here but when you look at the signature it is not mine it belongs to User: Reywas92. If you look at the history you will see I am the only editor who has made an edit to the page here. Am I missing something or is this a bug. BigDunc^Talk 15:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

The template had been edited and tildes were automatically converted to the user's signature; I have now fixed it so it adds the correct signature.[18] I'm not sure what the purpose of the edit of the template was; if anyone knows more about templates they may want to check for other errors. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 19:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

The template was reverted, so if there were any other problems caused by the changes they would have been fixed. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 11:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0194

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

Twinkle Speedy does not prompt for URL for i9 (imagecopyvio), it only prompts for i8, g6, g12, i1, and t3. Q ^{T C} 04:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

{{db-i9}} has been added to the URL prompting code. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0195

Status:  Closed

Resolution: User-specific problem and the user has since been blocked indefinitely. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Twinkle is not visible when not viewed in MonoBook layout. --frogger3140 (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0196

Status:  Closed

Resolution:  Resolved

Using the xfd button to add an MFD fails to add the new MFD subpage to WP:MFD - it complains it can't find the correct section. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 05:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

In User:AzaToth/twinklexfd.js there is the text twinklexfd.callbacks.mfd.todaysList. Above that is the text 'section': 2, which possibly refers to section 2 of the page. Before a heading was removed in this edit (on 25 June, which was the last date I could find that was added by Twinkle), section 2 was "Active discussions", but now it is today's date (when you were adding the entry it would have been "2008-08-24"). I could be completely wrong, as I don't really know how the code works, but I think it would have looked for a hidden comment in the "2008-08-24" section, and failed to find anything. If this is how it works, the solution would be to change the headings to what they were before that edit or to change twinklexfd.js (although I'm not sure if any other changes would be needed with either of those). --Snigbrook ^(talk) 11:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

The structure of the page had changed, so the way that Twinkle was trying to create a new section for the current day was failing. I think I have fixed the problem. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0197 (feedback required)

Status:  Feedback required

Resolution: none

When tagging an image for CSD, disputed use, the script goes by the history of the page, instead of the listed uploader. Example. It warns me of the deletion of the image, despite the fact that I am not the one that uploaded it. — Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 19:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

The image is on Commons, so the description page is there. I don't know why the "di" tab can still be used on Commons images; "csd" and "xfd" tabs are not displayed on them. It would be better to display an error message when attempting to nominate a Commons image for deletion, mentioning that it should be nominated there instead. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 20:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Could you please provide some examples of images that should have a di tab and some that shouldn't? Thanks. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0198

Status:  Closed

Resolution: Wait for autoconfirmation

Not sure if I am in the right place I have imported TW to my monobook and have ticked the required boxes in gadgets but cant get TW to work any ideas thanks You look better naked (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

You're probably not autoconfirmed yet, I think that takes four or five (?) days to kick in after you've created your account. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok thanks for that. You look better naked (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0199

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

Every so often, when tagging an article for speedy deletion or prod, the article will be deleted before the tagging is done, causing Twinkle to recreate the page with just a deletion tag. An example is presumably this edit (any example I've made has already been deleted, so I'm using one that looks like this bug). Any way for Twinkle to check before recreating the page? nneonneo ^talk 03:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I have also experienced this phenomenon, and I have a similar problem documenting it. gnfnrf (talk) 14:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

The speedy delete function already checks for the page's existence before tagging it. There's nothing really that can be done about the time difference between when the check is made and when the script adds the tag to the page. However, the prod function didn't have this check built-in, so if you were reading an article for 5 minutes and then decide to prod it, but it was deleted 4 minutes ago, Twinkle would recreate the page. I've added the same check in the speedy delete function to the prod function. Please let me know if there are any problems with it. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 15:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

TW-B-0200

Status:  Resolved

Resolution:  Fixed

The label of (at least) the CSD A1 button does not match the current CSD criterion. At the moment, it reads:

Little or no context – Very short articles providing little or no context ...

Since A1 is one of the most misapplied CSD tags, I should really be changed to the exact wording from WP:CSD:

No context – Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. ...

Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 17:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Can you please change the label to No context as well though? This is actually the more important change, since most taggers will only see the label. :) Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 19:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

How so? Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Because A1 was reworded over a year ago from "little or no context" and nowadays reads "No context. Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject", so twinklespeedy.js no longer reflects what A1 says: little context is not a reason for speedy deletion.
Typically, when an editor opens the CSD dialog, he only sees the labels, "little or no context" for A1, and has to point to the question mark to get the longer text. However, unexperienced taggers who don't know them all by heart will often only look at the CSD labels and find that "little context" quite often fits an article that should be deleted and just tag it with that (I know I have).
I hope that answers your question, I wasn't quite sure what you were referring to. :)
Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 20:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I hadn't noticed that change. I have made the corresponding adjustment in Twinkle. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 22:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. :) --Amalthea^Talk 23:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)