Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2012/October

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September November >


Proposals, October 2012

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.

NEW PROPOSALS

Category:Romania newspaper stubs creation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like to create a category for the {{Romania-newspaper-stub}} template under the category Category:Romaina newspaper stub I searched and there are over 54+ articles that have that template. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 22:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

We are at 57 articles so create three more stubs and we get to 60 - the threshold for category creation :) SeveroTC 22:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
With Category:European newspaper stubs having that many, we couldeven do it without creating more stubs, IMO. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Looks like other countries use the demonym. So, propose Category:Romanian newspaper stubs instead. Dawynn (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:New Zealand biologist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:New Zealand biologist stubs/{{NewZealand-biologist-stub}} (the category will also catch the existing {{NewZealand-botanist-stub}}) - a quick scan finds 64 stubs for this category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Support --Qetuth (talk) 13:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy: Category:Moroccan building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Combining all the templates brings us to 60+:

Dawynn (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Definitely. Check if there are any other appropriate stubs here, I see you forgot {{Morocco-airport-stub}}. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy ASAP. SeveroTC 22:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Subcats for Category:New Zealand people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following categories:

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy all - I keep meaning to get back to the NZ bio stubs - great to see they aren't forgotten. --Qetuth (talk) 12:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Prehistoric lobe-finned fish stubs‎

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:Prehistoric lobe-finned fish stubs and {{paleo-lobefinned-fish-stub}} to catch these, removing them from the oversized Category:Prehistoric bony fish stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Support - indeed, the Category:Prehistoric bony fish stubs is very, very big. --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 14:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Category created. Please, help populate it! :) --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Prehistoric cartilaginous fish stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. I have been going through the Category:Prehistoric fish stubs and there seem to be a lot of cartilaginous fish there, as this search shows. I think it is time to create the category:Prehistoric cartilaginous fish stubs. Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 20:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Support, along with a double-upmerged (for now) {{paleo-shark-stub}} to catch these. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Created also a double-upmerged (for now) {{paleo-rajiformes-stub}}. --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
And now, the category (which includes the three templates) is created. Please, help populate it! --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 21:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Comic book film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are currently 168 stub articles about comic book related films. Not all of these articles are tagged, and there is no one stub tag that would cover all the articles. I propose the creation of a {{Comics-film-stub}}, which would populate either Category:Comics film stubs or Category:Comic book film stubs. The category would be a child of both Category:Film stubs by genre and Category:Comics stubs. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

It looks fine, but I'm a bit confused as to why there isn't a permcat for this? SeveroTC 22:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
I can start tagging the appropriate articles anytime, but what permcat should the articles be placed into? Fortdj33 (talk) 00:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
It's not a requirement (although it does help), I'm just surprised that there isn't a Category:Comic book films. SeveroTC 22:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
There is already a Category:Films based on comics, though I'm not sure that it is the appropriate permcat for this stub. I'm just debating whether the category associated with {{Comics-film-stub}} should be titled Category:Comics film stubs or Category:Comic book film stubs. The former fits better as a sub-category of Category:Comics stubs, while the latter fits better in Category:Film stubs by genre, but the new category should probably be in both... Fortdj33 (talk) 03:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
See Category:Superhero films, which is a subcat of action films which we have a stub cat for. How many of these 168 would be covered by this, and would it be better to follow the permcats in this case? --Qetuth (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
There is not a stub category that covers all the stub articles in Category:Superhero films. Yes, some of them overlap, but films like Batman Fights Dracula, Iron Man: Rise of Technovore and Stamp Day for Superman have three completely different film stub tags, when all of them could be covered by {{Comics-film-stub}}. The same stub tag could also be used for films based on comics that are not about superheroes, such as 26 Years, Gundala and Skippy. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I was not saying there was a stub category for superhero films - The point I was trying to make is that Superhero films is part of the Category:Films by genre tree which we already split stubs by, and so might be a better scope for a new stub category than Comics, which is part of the Category:Films based on works tree which we never have used with stubs before. --Qetuth (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian Theatre Stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
India has rich and current tradition of theatre related activities and structures. I am proposing the following:

The aim is to further expand these will state-specific stubs in the future. Thanks. -MK 16:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

{{India-theat-stub}} (as per {{theat-stub}} et al). Not sure on Category:India theatre stubs or Category:Indian theatre stubs, but either would require a minimum 60 articles. SeveroTC 16:39, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Support. Although current regional theatre stub cats are split 2 and 2 on the issue, I think Category:Indian theatre stubs would be better (when 60 found), to match Indian culture stubs, Indian film stubs, etc. --Qetuth (talk) 23:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mosque templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose exploratory templates for any countries where the Muslim population is estimated at more than 20 million. See List of countries by Muslim population.

Dawynn (talk) 10:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Some of the numbers will be very small, but I don't see a problem with upmerged templates. However, there seem to be no articles as yet on mosques in Ethiopia. Looking at the country categories, {{Azerbaijan-mosque-stub}} and {{Singapore-mosque-stub}} may be worth adding. SeveroTC 11:25, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Support saves double-stubbing the whole category, and obvious room for future growth as coverage improves. --Qetuth (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sarcopterygii

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi. I am going through the prehistoric bony fish stubs; at the same time, I look at the pages linked to the article Sarcopterygii, and there are over 400 of them. There must be a lot of stubs related to that. What about creating a Category:Sarcopterygii stubs? Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Scanned the Category:Lobe-finned fish and found these results. 211 articles. I think it is worth a separate stub category. Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Support – seems overdue to me. --Epipelagic (talk) 15:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Category created as Category:Lobe-finned fish stubs (by analogy with the existing Category:Ray-finned fish stubs. Corresponding stub templates available. --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 16:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Support, of course. I don't think you needed this discussion for that. It's not controversial, just neglected. -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 00:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Brass instrument stubs / {{brass-instrument-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have full categories for String, Woodwind, Percussion, and Electronic. Propose starting with an exploratory template for Brass, category if sufficient articles found. Dawynn (talk) 10:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Support I doubt it'll reach 60 right now, but template still useful. --Qetuth (talk) 14:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Beryciformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have been going through the Category:Fish stubs and the Category:Ray-finned fish stubs. I have seen a lot of Beryciformes. What about creating a Template:Beryciformes-stub and a Category:Beryciformes stubs? Greetings, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 22:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Support template, category if sufficient articles found. I approve the category name, but please hold off on building the category until 60+ articles tagged. Dawynn (talk) 13:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I guess the moment has come to create the Category:Beryciformes stubs, as the number of stubs is already over 60. Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 00:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Caucasian politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing this new parent-only category. Serves as a collection point for all of the remaining country-level categories and templates under Category:Asian politician stubs. Also fits well under existing category Category:Caucasian people stubs. Will serve as parent for:

Dawynn (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New crustacean category and templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Propose the following:

Dawynn (talk) 12:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Oppose. Not needed, and too few articles to be worthwhile, in both cases. This is a waste of time and a waste of effort. Category:Crustacean stubs is not excessively large, having only 86 articles left. This proposal would thus replace one good stub category with three bad ones. The proposal has nothing to recommend it and should be dropped immediately. --Stemonitis (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
While I don't mind letting the Ostracods go, refusing the creation of a Maxillopoda category leaves an odd unparallel situation. Subclass Copepoda is then presented at the same level as classes Branchiopoda and Malacostraca. Adding a Maxillopoda category will provide a parallel set of three classes under Category:Crustacean stubs. Dawynn (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The taxonomic rank of the subcategories is entirely irrelevant; that is not the purpose of the stub category hierarchy. Stub categories are supposed to divide stubs into groups of manageable size – say, 60–600. There is absolutely no need for different stub categories to be at the same taxonomic rank. Odd and unparallel it may be, but it is far more practical, and that is what this process should be aiming towards. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Assorted other new categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Having trouble grouping the rest of these. Asking for speedy approval of all. Please review:

Dawynn (talk) 13:12, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy except I would prefer to discuss:
  • Category:Korean politician stubs should not be speedy as Korea is not a nation. Also seems undersorted, the first few transclusions I looked at were almost all South Korean.
  • Some of the decade based categories being created leave parents or siblings drastically undersized. Is it truly helpful to split early AFL bios into 114 1870s, and 20 combined 1860s and 1850s? And the new Japanese singles category leaves the parent empty. --Qetuth (talk) 23:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
But Korea was a nation once. I would contend that this is perfectly acceptable to tag any stub articles pertaining to politicians who served in Korea prior to the current national split.
I'd suggest that some of the "Pre" categories have outlived their purpose, but will abide by the input of others in this matter. Do we keep and rename Category:Pre-1930 drama film stubs to Category:Pre-1910 drama film stubs (and Category:Pre-1920 comedy film stubs to Category:Pre-1910 comedy film stubs), or do away with them altogether, keeping the templates for upmerging to Category:Drama film stubs and Category:Comedy film stubs categories respectively. Do we keep Category:Australian rules biography, pre-1880 birth stubs and rename it appropriately, or just move the templates to the upper parent? (Category:Australian rules biography stubs) Dawynn (talk) 14:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Concerning the Category:Japanese single stubs:
  • A parent is not "empty" if it contains filled child categories.
  • I find it really difficult to believe that the Japanese have only been writing music for less than 13 years. Seems like a search for Japanese songs recorded prior to 2000 would be helpful to fill this parent category.
Dawynn (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Having looked through the Korean politicians, I see that most of those stubbed are Joseon dynasty politicians, so you are right there. As for the pre-categories, I can see arguments both ways. Some pre-cat contents are the forerunners/pioneers, and hence may be notable for different reasons and of interest to different editors. I would certainly argue against Category:Pre-2000 Japanese singles but not the film or AFL ones. No problem with creating any of these after further examination, but I think rename/upmerge of the aftermath should be taken case by case. --Qetuth (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Assorted rail transport categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal for these rail-related categories:

Dawynn (talk) 13:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Assorted geography categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal for the following geographical categories:

Dawynn (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Assorted zoology categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal for these animal categories:

Dawynn (talk) 12:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

I have recently added these templates to more articles, so the minimum has been (nearly) reached to justify the creation of three more categories. --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 19:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

West Virginia County categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposals for the following counties:

Dawynn (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

British act of parliament stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Both Category:United Kingdom law stubs and Category:Statute stubs are oversized. It looks like there are around 450 articles in their intersection. Propose {{UK-statute-stub}} and Category:United Kingdom Acts of the Parliament stubs to hold these. Not sure if there is a better category name though. The permcat is at Category:Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, whereas the only existing sibling is at Category:United States federal legislation stubs. --Qetuth (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

In general, support. The problem in the naming comes from the permcats reflecting the legal status of the parliament - that of England, Great Britain, the UK and also of Northern Ireland and the two incarnations of the parliament in Scotland. Will the new types cover all the parliaments? Or are they restricted to the parliament from 1801 onwards? If the former, perhaps Category:United Kingdom statute stubs: if the later, perhaps Category:Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom stubs. SeveroTC 12:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
I think it would be better to make the scope broad to start with, and maybe there will be subcats later, so Category:United Kingdom statute stubs. --Qetuth (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Argentiniformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have been going through the Category:Fish stubs and the Category:Ray-finned fish stubs. I have seen a lot of Argentiniformes. What about creating a Template:Argentiniformes-stub and a Category:Argentiniformes stubs? Greetings, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 12:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Support - 59 stubs is just barely too small - I think that given the size of Category:Ray-finned fish stubs, we can IAR and create it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Support --Qetuth (talk) 12:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Category and stub created. --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 14:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:African railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We're up to 51 transclusions already of its stub tag, {{Africa-railstation-stub}}. Even if I don't end up finding 9 more (and I probably will), this template feeds into the oversized Category:African building and structure stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Support - 57 now by the look, and I think this one is useful enough for some leeway. --Qetuth (talk) 12:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Support and any country level templates to upmerge that you see fit when sorting. SeveroTC 12:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alkene

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose creation of Category:Alkene stubs and {{Alkene-stub}}. Past 60 possible candidates, parent(s) oversized. Plasmic Physics (talk) 23:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Support --Qetuth (talk) 12:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Asian football club speedies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose speedy creation of Category:Indian football club stubs and Category:Japanese football club stubs, both are past 60 transclusions, and parent is oversized. --Qetuth (talk) 06:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy. SeveroTC 16:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy Indian building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

--Qetuth (talk) 14:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy. SeveroTC 16:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2012/October&oldid=1151047339"