Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review/John F. Kennedy International Airport
I've listed this article for peer review to get from B-class to GA-class based on the grading/quality scale and here's why it meets each criterion:
- 1. For Criteria #1, I verified that all material had met the copyright policies and it did so. All images were verified to have met such guidelines. Also, all spelling and grammar is sophisticated and proper with good sentences and thoughtful structure.
- 2. For Criteria #2, I verified all references and today, much time was spent converting a few bare references into scientific references. It has a list of 140 good supporting references. None have [failed verification] or [dead link] tags. Also, all refs were checked that the content did not contain original research.
- 3. For Criteria #3, I verified that it covered the main topic. I made sure that stuff such as the terminals also contained enough details without having too much pointless, excess detail.
- 4. For Criteria #4, the wording alone and the meaning of the content is very neutral. Even some (such as the Pan Am flying saucer demolition petition) incidents that could've lead to an opinion or biased information, led to a neutral statement that was verified by the petition about what type of people and was also introduced in a non-biased manner.
- 5. For Criteria #5, the page history says enough. There are not often content disputes, and since I've been editing the article, I have not seen an edit war take place on the article.
- 6. For Criteria #6, most sections contain at least one photo, diagram, map, etc. The only ones that don't are ones where a photo would not contribute to the article nor add any encyclopedic value to the article.
For those who are skeptical that it should be a GA, comment below about why you don't think it doesn't meet it. If you think it does, then comment below about why you think so.
Thanks,