Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 27
August 27
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unused, uncontested. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Template:PDC Top 32 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused, never updated since its creation in January 2014. NSH002 (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- delete, not useful if no one is going to keep it up-to-date. Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Alakzi (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Template:MusicScore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Superseded by the <score> tags, see Help:Score. The Evil IP address (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep –
<score>...</score>is not always the appropriate option; its output is often too big and its use requires considerable expertise. If existing uses of the template are replaced by identical rendering via<score>...</score>, I'll change my mind. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC) - Keep it's widely used and deleting it would unnecessarily break good pages. Having more than one way to do something is not a problem. -- Fbergo (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 13#Template:MMOs by Electronic Arts. Alakzi (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NAVBOX as it not a "single, coherent subject" and the articles listed do not refer to each other at all. It's an arbitrary collection: genre by publisher. The MMO (massively multiplayer online) part only says one thing about how it is played, not about the actual gameplay. Soetermans. T / C 09:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- And by that same logic we could have first-person shooters by 2K, action-adventure games by Nintendo or role-playing games by Square-Enix. --Soetermans. T / C 09:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- delete, seems to be better covered by a category. Frietjes (talk) 18:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 13#Template:ECB reference values. Alakzi (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Template is an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of stats. As I've argued at Template_talk:ECB_reference_values#What_is_the_point_of_this.3F, perhaps some content (ie a few examples for illustrative purposes of how the values are calculated) can be salvaged, or perhaps converting it into a graph of historical variations might be useful. But the creator insists on keeping 40 months of raw statistical data for reasons that escape me. In its current state it is WP:NOT in scope of the project. Note that the template only has 2 transclusions as is. TDL (talk) 03:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).