Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 November 3

< November 2	November 4 >

November 3

Template:IE etymology ref

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after subst:'ing the only transclusion Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IE etymology ref (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Links to Tower of Babel which has really obsolete entries (no laryngeals). Also, I'm not sure whether that site qualifies as RS. One mainspace transclusion. Delete? Or change to reference LIV, NIL or another modern source? ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that web site is a reliable source, but even assuming it is, the template is only transcluded once. The reference could be written into Vṛddhi without the template. I note, by the way, that Nostratic languages, Nāga, and surprisingly enough Green all appear to cite the site, but none use the template. Cnilep (talk) 02:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
substitute and delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sportscentcat1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused

Template:Sportscentcat1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:No admin backlog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep as a useful marker for bots Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:No admin backlog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template contains no content itself. Wikipedian 2 (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a empty template to make it easier for bots to have a placeholder for {{admin backlog}}, it shouldn't be deleted. _→AzaToth 14:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep unless there is a simple way to add a functional disabled flag to {{admin backlog}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The purpose of this template is to say "bots, please place {{admin backlog}} here if the page is backlogged". Because it's an instruction to bots, there's not much point in it showing content to humans. --ais523 22:42, 6 November 2014 (U T C)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Presidents of Bangladesh Islami Chatra Shibir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Presidents of Bangladesh Islami Chatra Shibir (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template with only a few person with their own articles in Wikipedia. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 08:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be informed that this, like all of wikipedia, is a work in progress. I am extremely surprised at the unprofessional explanatipn and even more unprofessional attitude in filing this nomination. With common sense as my defence, I respectfully oppose the deletion nomination. ~Mohammad Hossain~ 11:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep, but fix the misspelling. appears to link more than four articles. Frietjes (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment let's wait until above issues have been fixed. VandVictory (talk) 06:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.