Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 31
< October 30 | November 1 > |
---|
October 31
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Fork of Template:Infobox automobile, with which it should be merged. The only additional parameters seem to be electric motor, drivetrain, battery, range, electric range, plug-in charging; the remaining 23 parameters are identical between the two templates. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support merger of electric fields to regular automobile infobox. As a member of WikiProject Automobiles, the existence of this template is totally redundant to the needs of our project. OSX (talk • contributions) 02:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support merger. No need to have two templates when the additional parameters specific of plug-in electric vehicles can be easily added to the more general template.--Mariordo (talk) 02:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: here are some testcases, for the use of electric fields see the second and third examples.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was wrong template nominated Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Africa topic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
pointless template Volunteer Marek 17:58, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep it's used on 5453 articles, so it certainly isn't pointless.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep What's 'pointless' about it? Arms Jones (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, something got mixed up here. The template I meant to nominate is the "Time in Africa" one, as found for example here: Time in Kenya. When you click "View" on that template (which is pretty pointless and used on articles which are pretty pointless themselves), it takes you to the "Africa topic" template for some reason, which of course is a legitimate template which should not be deleted. How do I nominate the "Time in Africa" one specifically? Volunteer Marek 00:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I see that just the "Time in" needs to be removed from the tag. Annoying. Anyway, please ignore this nomination. Volunteer Marek 00:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete after merging with the article. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
single use template, can be merged with the article. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Merge with Government of Minneapolis per nom, this is just a simple table.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
After the addition of a wnba
parameter the Template:Infobox NBA All-Star Game works for WNBA games as well (see example), and the output is identical. eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- merge Frietjes (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
One of the criteria for navboxes is that there needs to be a notable, existing article of the topic of that navbox. In this case there is no Sporting News College Athlete of the Year article, nor has this been maintained. I believe this is navbox creep, there isn't a reason for its existence. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete navbox overkill Frietjes (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Thingg (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
navbox with a single entry to a non notable self-released ep by a non-notable band noq (talk) 11:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Even if the album survives AFD, there's no need for a navbox for a one album. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Too small I have deleted the template because it was too small. You are right. I am discussing the "notability" stuff here: User talk:Noq IndiePostPunk (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Fork of Template:Infobox protein used in four articles. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- merge, adding an option to either collapse or suppress some of the output. Frietjes (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Geobox Region (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Two transclusions, redundant to Template:Infobox settlement. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete, redundant to {{Geobox}}, replaced in Lower Assam and Kamrup region. Frietjes (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.