Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 15

< May 14	May 16 >

May 15

Template:Israeli Figure Skating Championships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Israeli Figure Skating Championships (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

navigates nothing. Frietjes (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'd say userfy if there is going to be articles for the individual years to be created, but they don't seem to be much a national championship when there aren't even competitors in the major categories. -- Whpq (talk) 20:25, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not useful. Creation of articles seems doubtful. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 14:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Con artists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Con artists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Totally unnecessary template, uniting haphazardly chosen persons, ranging from mafia bosses (Mogilevitch) to garden variety white-collar criminals (Ken Lay) to traditional con men (Ponzi) and everything in between. This template provides no encyclopedic value. Please delete. -- Y not? 16:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The articles are not strongly related. If desired, one could simply add List of con artists as an entry in a "see also" section. -- Whpq (talk) 16:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and clean-up - (I mostly edit anonymously on a dynamic I.P., this is primarily my "at-work" / "discussion" username). It's a fair template, along the lines of Template:Soviet Spies, but I think it would do with a re-organization - listing con men by "type" of con (bunco, advance-fee, Ponzi, etc) rather than era of activity, which is a pretty useless sorting system. Strani Beeap (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, better served by a category and/or a list article. Frietjes (talk) 22:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Legend of Zelda chronology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Legend of Zelda chronology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obvious issues with WP:GAMECRUFT. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after transclusion in The Legend of Zelda, assuming that there are any sources to back up this "chronology". It isn't useful for navigation as we already have a Zelda navigation template. -- Whpq (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need since the Hyrule Historia image already does everything we need with this information in a better way. Also regarding your other point, this is backed up from sources since the timeline came from an official collector's book from the series creators' Nintendo. This said this template in not needed since we already have a navigation template and the timeline info is also covered separately.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 23:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Redundant to the out-of-universe template which lists them in terms of their real-world release dates, which is preferrable to this in-universe, WP:GAMECRUFT-based one. (The fanbase loves to research and speculate about the fictional timeline, but it is far from one of the main aspects of the series.) Sergecross73 msg me 18:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Seems superfluous, and rather in-universe, as per Sergecross73. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete its use as a bottom-of-the-page navbox is redundant to the main navbox. It's too big and complicated to make into a sidebox like other vg chronology templates. Thus, delete. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's unnecessary and superfluous. We already have a template covering all Zelda games, and the average Wikipedia reader doesn't care about Zelda chronology. The point of templates is making navigation easier, not telling a series' timeline. - 190.30.217.21 (talk) 02:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Doctor Who RG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 23 May 2013. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OG review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 23 May 2013. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jetix Animation Concepts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jetix Animation Concepts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template of unsourced content. jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 06:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 22:58, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.