Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 7

< September 6	September 8 >

September 7

Template:Infobox Mexican Cabinet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Mexican Cabinet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use. Could be Subst:. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Single-use, but with obvious uses elsewhere. Better I think would be a general version, since it's a virtual clone of {{Infobox U.S. Cabinet}}. Mackensen (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this is analogous to {{infobox U.S. Cabinet}}, and that it could be used more widely based on that precedent. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep, but we should consider modifying it to be more general or merging it with the U.S. template. Frietjes (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Csl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deletion — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Csl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 25#Template:Ll another template that does nothing except render links in an unnecessary/nonstandard way. Barely used but if it were should simply be replaced with standard links JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No longer needed. Yours aye, Buaidh 17:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Truro City F.C. managers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, the number of links was increased during the discussion. Feel free to renominate the template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:47, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Truro City F.C. managers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox is overkill and not needed per WP:NENAN. It only links two articles with no scope to be expanded since this is a list of managers for a low-level football team. BigDom (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment are there any other "low-level" teams in Category:England football manager history navigational boxes (e.g., Template:Welling United F.C. managers)? if many of the other low-level clubs have these templates, then I would say keep this one. Frietjes (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, other low-level teams have these navboxes but most of them, such as the one you linked, have enough blue links to be useful. I didn't nominate this template because of the club plays at, but the lack of links in it; a navbox that only has two things in it is pointless. BigDom (talk) 15:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I added Hodges and Newton, so there are now four managers linked by the box. I'm not sure if the others have articles (or are notable enough to have articles, e.g. Chris Webb). Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Atn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and replace with {{aan}}. It seems to be a less versatile version of {{aan}}. Also, if no parameters are specified it gives an "expansion depth exceeded error and the page with the template shows up in Category:Pages where expansion depth is exceeded. Alternatively, the template could be fixed. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This has long been obsoleted by {{talk archive navigation}} (which evolved from it). Someone should probably manually go through the transclusions when closing as quite a few of them have {{aan}} or the like on them already. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Zumtobel Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:46, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zumtobel Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Zumtobel website (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Thorn website (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tridonic website (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ledon website (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused. Each just provides a link to the relevant company website. They were all formerly used in the "External links" section of a single article (Zumtobel Lighting Group). DH85868993 (talk) 07:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Mega Man character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:55, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Mega Man character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used by only one article, and there aren't enough articles currently to support a dedicated sub-infobox. Izno (talk) 03:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to {{Infobox character}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
substitute, since it is being used as a child/module for the video game character box. it's not redundant to {{infobox character}} since there are no fields in common. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would say that's unnecessary. There's a significant consensus (somewhere!) which suggests that these sub-infoboxes are on the wrong side of WP:GAMEGUIDE. I also nominated this one because it's a low-hanging fruit on the point. I'll probably bring up the more widely used ones at WP:VG/GL. --Izno (talk) 15:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Spark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:43, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spark (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seems to be too soon for this navbox, which navigates between just one song, the artist's record label, and a tour where she served as opening act for some of the shows. Gongshow ^Talk 02:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's also not about spark -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 06:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gimmel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gimmel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox does not appear necessary (WP:NENAN), navigating between only three articles (two band members - each linked to twice - and the group's record label) beyond the band's main page. Gongshow ^Talk 02:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, only navigates people, not singles/albums and the people are already well connected through the band page. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jonna Pirinen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:40, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jonna Pirinen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox does not appear useful (WP:NENAN), navigating between only two articles (record label, related band). Gongshow ^Talk 02:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Dragon of Angur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:38, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Dragon of Angur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template can only be used to navigate between two articles, both of which have been proposed for deletion. Dianna (talk) 00:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Navbox not warranted as it currently has very few links and will (in all likelihood) have none at all in a week's time. Gongshow ^Talk 02:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only links deleted by PROD - NN self-published book/series. JohnCD (talk) 16:36, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.