Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 28

< January 27	January 29 >

January 28

Template:Infobox Croatian EU membership referendum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep until it is demonstrated that it can be replaced with correct computation of percentages. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:00, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Croatian EU membership referendum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use. Subst:, or replace with a more generic template?. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Andy's edits 12:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Infobox Referendum (IR) cannot be substituted for use in this referendum article because it calculates vote percentages inaccurately. Specifically, the IR template calculates the percentages counting Yes/No (i.e. valid) votes only, while in this case the invalid/blank votes are taken into consideration when calculating percentage of Yes and No votes by the official source. This is so because applicable legislation considers the blank/invalid votes virtually as "No" votes, while reporting those separately from actual "No" votes. I suspect this solution may be useful in other cases too, so perhaps the template title should be changed to a more generic one. As the article itself is currently linked from the main page and the tfd tag apparently makes it malfunction, this should be resolved quickly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 00:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no need to have a template (nor to expend processing power) repeatedly calculating percentages. the figures are known and will not change; the percentages can be hard-coded. OTOH, if {{infobox referendum}} is faulty or inadequate, it should be fixed, not forked. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until you simply implement this as an option in {{Infobox referendum}}? :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW we seem to have more duplication there:

{{Infobox Referendum approved with map}} (15 transclusions)
{{Infobox Referendum pending with map}} (1 transclusion)
{{Infobox Referendum rejected with map}} (18 transclusions)
{{Infobox Referendum with detailed key}} (5 transclusions)

None of this seems like it can't be done with optional parameters. --Joy [shallot] (talk)

And they also have an improperly titled documentation page - {{Referendum with map help}}. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note Another editor has now replaced this with {{Infobox Referendum}}, making the template under discussion unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note The replacement was made because the template malfunctioned once the TFD tag was placed rendering the article garbled - i.e. it had to be done, but if the TFD tag is removed from the template, it will be reused.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Caribbean Football Union

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Caribbean Football Union (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Covered by Template:CONCACAF teams J36miles (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - CFU organises the Caribbean Championship and is a different entity to CONCACAF. TheBigJagielka (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful to navigate and fnd what you're looking for regarding Caribbean football. IJA (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.