Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 6
August 6
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Yoruba Theogony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
most of the links are generic, and not to specific Yoruba topics. we have {{Orisa-Ifá}} which is better for actual navigation. Frietjes (talk) 21:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect to {{Orisa-Ifá}}, then Ego White Tray (talk) 05:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
This template generates categories. I suggest that we subst it and the categories are in the page body instead of being hidden in a template. We can keep the template to add categories to the future but it should be subst-only. Magioladitis (talk) 18:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Content is embedded in User talk:Madcow 93/TopSection. DH85868993 (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure). DH85868993 (talk) 02:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Korean article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 12:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment it's a substitution template, it should always look unused, since it builds a framework for a new article. -- 70.50.151.36 (talk) 03:56, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn Template documentation has been expanded to indicate purpose and usage. DH85868993 (talk) 02:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Soccerstatskey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 11:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Its obvious why. Template doesn't even work, and is unused. TBrandley 17:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template has already been speedily deleted by an administrator. Non-admin housekeeping closure.--SGCM (talk) 15:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:TeamMedalWinner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 10:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
NS stops templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:NS stops 32000 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:NS stops 32100 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 10:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. It looks like the author, Markussep (talk · contribs), abandoned these in favor an {{s-line}} based solution, but I'd like to hear from him. Mackensen (talk) 12:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:02, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Maulers roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. Content is embedded at Maulers (slamball team)#Current Roster. DH85868993 (talk) 07:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
RU combo squad templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:RU combo squad player (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:RU combo squad start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:RU combo squad end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
{{RU combo squad player}} and {{RU combo squad end}} are unused. {{RU combo squad start}} is only used by {{RU combo squad player}}. DH85868993 (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge with article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:List of Tunisian governorates by creation date (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 06:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Merge the template's content into the List of Tunisian governorates by creation date article, where it belongs, and then delete. Having this info in a dedicated template is pointless. Constantine ✍ 07:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:PhasaThai (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. Purpose unclear (to me). DH85868993 (talk) 06:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Railway info (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused (apart from its own talkpage). DH85868993 (talk) 06:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Seems to now be included as part of {{Infobox protein}}. DH85868993 (talk) 05:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:MelbStn block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Very old. Only used in userspace of User:TPK. Delete or userfy? DH85868993 (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (editor only had two edits in the past four years) Secret account 10:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
MLB rivalry templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Template:MLB SoxCubs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:MLB MarlinsRays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. See also Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_July_25#Template:MLB_OriolesNationals. I think that's all of them now. DH85868993 (talk) 04:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant to Template:2012 NL Record vs. opponents, Template:2012 AL Record vs. opponents, and previous years' editions. Intended purpose may be to sort this data by team matchups over multiple years, instead of by year across all teams in league, but it's completely unnecessary. (I copypasted this from the Orioles-Nationals one.) - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 16:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator...William 17:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The only use I could see for this would be at the rivalry article, which even if desired, would be a single use template and deleted anyway. Resolute 14:18, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete and honestly the Marlins/Rays rivalry article should be deleted also though I don't understand what's with people fascination with these articles. Secret account 10:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
The speedy deletion tag associated with this template has been deleted - see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 January 7#Template:Di-no author. Judging from that discussion it seems it is not actually necessary to provide the author of a file, only its source and copyright status. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 03:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not that it matters but in looking over the other discussion it doesn't surprise me why the "parent" template was nominated - the basis of that was based on the noms misunderstanding that no "deletion criteria or image policies states that the author of a file must be provided" thus "author" is not relevant is a poor reason for deletion. Wikipedia has always been clear the any use of any material must be established and this is done via a few methods - who owns the copyright being the core one. Image Use Policy has always been clear in what the requirements are - Currently it says Always specify on the description page where the image came from (the origin, sometimes called its "source") and information on how this could be verified. Examples include scanning a paper copy, or a URL, or a name/alias and method of contact for the photographer. . I, personally, have never had a problem understanding that for an image "where the image came from" is meant to be more than simply naming the website the uploader stole it from. And it is 100% clear that when using the Information template when you leave off the "Author" tag you will get a notice that says: "This file has no author information, and may be lacking other information. Files should have a summary to inform others of the content, author, source, and date if possible. If you know or have access to such information, please add it to the file page." Leaving off the "author" could, and oft times has, caused the F9 to be used. And there in lies the issue with far too many admin who over see Images and speedy. No author 100% equals "lack the necessary licensing information to verify copyright status." Template:Di-no author-notice was added as an explicit reason that people could understand - Lack of supplying an author is cause for deletion. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
page exists as Samsu-iluna, this is a variant, no recent activity. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete wrong location for article sandbox. (it should be Talk:Samsu-iluna/sandbox ) -- 70.50.151.36 (talk) 03:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.