Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10→Archive 15

14 Year Old Girls

Kept at AfD, then prodded. This was not an uncontroversial deletion. -Chubbles (talk) 01:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done contested prod, however it needs more references to support notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

David J Farrar

David J Farrar · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] I suppose the article was deleted because of alleged conflict. There was none. it was factual.Your editor at the time sought more contributions from me. The current celebration of 100 years of aerospace at Bristol, England, will shortly release an article showing how without me and my colleagues there would be nothing to celebrate.Wikipedia should note this.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dajofar (talk • contribs)

  •  Not done As far as I see the article has not been deleted and there is nothing to undelete at this point. Apart from heeding the COI advice you should use one account only, though.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Padrino Framework

important ruby web programming framework -213.213.139.124 (talk) 12:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padrino (software). If you believe that the discussion was not correctly closed according to consensus, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jayjg (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

File:VideoCells Logo.png

The logo is the logo of VideoCells, the company that is the subject of the article. This logo is being used at the request of and with the permission of the CEO, Stuart Steinberg, and COO, Avner Herscovits. I am the author of the article and work as a tech writer at VideoCells. -Izzycohen (talk) 12:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the file has been restored. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Matthew McAvene

I don't understand why my page was deleted, any questions contact me at matt@matthewmcavene.com. -98.171.172.56 (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done As the page was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, it is automatically restored on request. The concern cited in the PROD nomination was "2 years with no third party sources, nothing in google news, non-notable." The only sources cited are the subject's own website and Myspace; the article needs to show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to satisfy the WP:Notability requirement, see also the particular guideline for musical performers at WP:MUSICBIO. Also, if you are the subject of the article, see WP:Autobiography and WP:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 15:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Aamer Sarfraz

Aamer Sarfraz · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

References available now - for example, Substance Use & Misuse, Volume 37, Issue 8 - 10 May 2002 , pages 1149 - 1178, and for status details http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/staff/profile/default.aspx?go=12427 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Renala (talk • contribs) 16:40, 22 April 2010

 Done I have restored the article to your userspace at User:Renala/Aamer Sarfraz for you to add sources. Please read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (academics) for the standard required. Before moving it back to the main space, please check with user Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs), the admin who deleted it. His deletion was based on a deletion debate five years ago at WP:Articles for deletion/Aamer Sarfraz; I believe that was a different Aamer Sarfraz, and will explain that to him, but you should still check with him. JohnCD (talk) 21:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Norb Vonnegut

Norb Vonnegut is the author of Top Producer, a financial thriller that has received a lot of acclaim, particularly in our current political environment. His second book, The Gods of Greenwich, will be published this year by Minotaur/St. Martins Press. Norb is a frequent speaker and recipient of significant media attention. He should be in Wikipedia! -Megvon (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done As a contested PROD, the article has been automatically restored on request, but you need to provide some independent reliable sources to show that he meets the WP:Notability requirement - see WP:AUTHOR. The only external reference - Publisher's Weekly - is a deadlink. JohnCD (talk) 21:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Chintha Lakshmi Sinhaarachchi

Firstly this is not a biography of a living person. Chintha Lakshmi Sinhaarachchi passed away in year 2000. I do not have the exact dates and they will be put up as soon as I find them. Secondly I have added references. Chintha Lakshmi Sinhaarachchi is a very popular writer in Sri Lanka. She translated several Bengali novels to Sinhala directly from Bengali. Her translations received several national awards. I am new to editing wikipedia, so my apologies if I have done this in the wrong way. Any advice is much appreciated. JanithCK (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The article has not been deleted. As the subject is not a living person, I have removed the BLP-PROD template. If you have other references but do not know how to insert them, make a note of them on the article talk page and put {{helpme}} there with a request for assistance. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 08:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks JohnCD. Is it ok if I removed the unreferencedBLP tag and orphan tag as this article does not belong to those categories now? Regards. JanithCK (talk) 13:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)JanithCK
Yes, I think so. You may find the bot pits back the "Orphan" one, as I think its threshold is three incoming links, but I wouldn't worry about it. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Elgreco7 (talk) 07:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The page has not been deleted. You inserted new material, and another editor removed it with the edit summary "NPOV- moving to talk page". That means he thinks it does not comply with Wikipedia's policy on WP:Neutral point of view. So what you have is a WP:Content dispute, and you should discuss it on the article talk page with the other editor and try to reach a WP:Consensus. I see that he has written there:"OK. This can go in. Eventually. But it needs to be substantially rewritten until it complies with Wiki rules on neutrality. I'll get to it when I find more sources." JohnCD (talk) 08:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Nihal Kaviratne CBE

This document is purely legal -Nihal Kaviratne 14:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

It appears that this article was created under 2 names Nihal Kaviratne and Nihal Kaviratne CBE, the later is unnecessary and has been tagged for speedy deletion. Nihal Kaviratne will likely meet notability guideline as the article is improved by various editors but the creator of the article has been cautioned about editing articles about himself.--RadioFan (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

i could sleep for a thousand years

This is an album that will be released on June 29 2010 and there is no copyright infringement involved so why has it been deleted? -Captainmagenta (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done This article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Could Sleep For A Thousand Years. It is unlikely that an unreleased album will have attracted enough independent comment to be notable, see also WP:NALBUMS, and it seems this one has not. If you believe the discussion was wrongly closed, or if you have new information, you should ask user Tone (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the discussion; if he does not agree, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Knock Out Roses

Reason to keep article. There is no other article on Wiki concerning this very popular new landscape rose. Their is high demand to know what this type rose is. -Chancery1 (talk) 01:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done article is not yet deleted, if you want to keep the article, remove the promotional language, and remove the prod template at the top. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
...and add a reliable source for what the article says - see WP:Verifiability. JohnCD (talk) 13:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Osman Malikyar

There is no reason at all this page should be deleted. -Namso85 (talk) 08:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

The page has not been deleted, but it will be unless you provide references to reliable sources to confirm what it says. WP:Verifiability: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true." There are three references on the page, but none of them mentions Osman Malikyar, let alone confirm what the article says, or give any indication that he is notable enough for an article - see WP:MUSICBIO for the standard required for a musical performer. JohnCD (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

clipbucket

Living in a country with about 5 million citizens, I find it a little bit sad to realize that 'notability' will require more than the entire population of my country, under the age of 20, to be using the stuff the article is about. I thought wikipedia was about being able to write articles about .. pretty much everything, even stuff not showing up in the first few sponsored google search results and really strange species of frogs and extinct dino's, which I guess is pretty unnotable if using that formulae.

Anyway, being open source software, I don't find it THAT surprising, that the developers have problems not showing just a tiny bit of pride (i promise they regret that now), and that it may shine through in their selection of words, or whatever the reason may have been for deleting the article. The people arguing for deletion seemed to 'have an agenda' much more then the article writers did, in my honest opinion. Free software is not something anyone make money from, so I just can't find any decent reason in those listed. It seems plain wrong. Not responding and just going through with deletion as if we didn't even exist. I thought wikipedia was about 'everyone being able to write articles' and have them 'mature over time' through collaboration and such, the article was deleted without anyone giving any real reasons that made any sense to the mayority of the participants and without giving prudent responses, just repeating 'unnotable' (700.000+ users) and 'found on sourceforge' - (matters in what way?) or trying to assist at any point.. It would be nice, if someone could clear this up and figure out why the article actually got deleted. At least some of the content must've been ok. -TheoUTSKIRTs (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clipbucket. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Eluchil404 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
FWIW, you might want to read WP:Notability. Nothing is said about requiring a certain number of users.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for responding. I have read that Notability article quite a lot of times and have allready provided the required links and such a few times. The voting system isn't that good i'm afraid, first - my vote isn't counting, it's not even there but I'm sure I voted to keep. Another person has voted several times and got it deleted that way by managing to get more delete-votes than is actually the case, if other people was aware of that, i guess it would've been more fair, bit like a shoot-em-up lol, so... Actually doesn't stuff like that void the voting in normal circumstances (aka cheating)? Just take a look please, it's really weird. It was closed before anyone knew about it basically. So the mod effectively had the decision from the get go. At least the voting system i'm aware of shouldn't allow that. If notability really does have anything to do with either 1: the thing being publicly known (700k+ users),the discussion actually did seem to cross that subject - otherwise i wouldn't have mentioned that because i really dont care, just want to get this working and over with - i'm not here to cloud it further, naturally, or 2: other third-party sources writing articles completely out of our control - then we really covered that thoroughly by now. I moved some links to third-party articles written by hosting companies (that's probably the best shell in the gun, they always choose what works the best, i think that's a pretty decent third party to vouch for a free software) to the talk page because otherwise how can anyone see them and verify, they have always been around but was ignored, if that doesn't cover it i don't think anything will no matter what i try. I have nothing to do with web-hosting either, i just like to write plugins for this thing in my free time and wouldn't mind people to be able to actually locate it and i guess other people thought wikipedia would be a good place for that. I don't really understand the problem in the first place. It must be a misunderstanding. I don't have time to search around for mister or misses 404 right now, it's very late and i have better things to do right now (wink) I will try, just not today. This wiki stuff is sortof black magic to me, i'll have to look at how to 'contact' people here some other time.

Gwinnett Majik

reasoning -M3trix (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 

Page is being modeled after the complete entry of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartersville_Warriors. Thank you in advance.
OK you have mistaken the name, you created Gwinnett Majic which has not been deleted. To see what you ahve done look at Special:Contributions/M3trix. Or click "my contributions". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Adil Khan

Adil Khan( formerly known as adil thathaal) is a well known actor/dancer from oslo norway, he is the winner of Dansefeber 2006 ( norwegian version of " so you think you can dance"), before that he had won Scandinavian breakdance competetion in malmø ( sweden), it is strange that Christopher Flinder Pedersen (a person who stood 3rd in "dansefeber") can have a page on wikipedia english) but adil khan who won that competetion had been deleted. beside winning dance competetions , adil khan is a well known theatre actor in norway, he had played the main roles in " west side story", " nutcracker", @Alice", spring awakening, and Mowgli in " the jungle book".. right now he is playing the main role in norwegian state television´s ( NRK) forthcoming serial...this is just the start of his carreer ( he is 27 now), adil khan is going to be the next big thing in entertainment world because he is in contact with indian/ pakistani film makers ( adil khan is a norwegian with pakistani roots)

adil khan had been nominated for the prestegious theater award for his performance in the jungle book...adil khan has been awarded " the artistic award" by the mayor of Oslo in 2009 ( norway)...Adil khan had been the official ambassador for FRI ( an anti smoking compaign, funded the ministry of health norway),..adil khan had receieved an award in 2008 from " cancer organization" which brought him in the same line as Gro Harlem Bruntland ( a former norwegian prime minister)...some of the things about adil khan could be checked on norwegian version of wikipedia ( though his page needs to be updated there:

one thing to make clear, i am not adil khan, though i use thathaal as my name, this is my caste name, which i share with adil khan..there are almost one thousand thathaals in oslo, norway. - Thathaal (talk) 21:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done The title had been protected from creation because several articles about non-notable persons called Adil Khan had been created; howvere, that was some time ago, and it sounds as though this is a different one, so I have unprotected the title and you can create an article. Before you do, read WP:Your first article carefully, particularly on the need to cite reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Nature Camp

The current redirection of Nature Camp's page to George Washington National Forest (where it is located) does not do it justice. Nature Camp has a history, and deserves it. In the discussion of deletion, many wikipedia people claimed it lacked reliable sources, or that the webpage was not good enough a reference. keep in mind, however, that most editors are patrons of nature camp who have gone there before, and are infact first person references themselves. the story of percy on the page cannot be traced to an internet route because it is a verbal story that the campers hear one night. If Nature Camp is re-added, -71.178.24.28 (talk) 03:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Information based on editors' personal experience is original research and not acceptable - Wikipedia's policy of verifiability requires that "readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source." The redirect was decided at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature Camp; if you think the discussion was wrongly decided, you should approach user Arbitrarily0 (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed it. If he does not agree, see WP:ND3 for what you can do to try to get a consensus to change the decision. JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Yard Birds

Chain once was prominant -70.58.82.120 (talk) 06:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done contested prod, please improve the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Tier 5(Five) Unemployment Insurance Political Activism

Want to achieve assistance from editors so that this article complies with Wiki guidelines.Usunemployed (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC) -Usunemployed (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Firstly do not just copy other web sites such as http://www.change.org/petitions. Next since this is an encyclopedia it has to be written like an article and not a promotion. The way to do this is to find what independent people have written on the topic, and rewrite what they wrote. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Re-Adil Khan

reasoning -Thathaal (talk) 10:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

thanks you sir for the positive reply, i did my best but i am having problem to have adil's name added in the categories, could you please explain to me whow to do that, since this is going to be my first article.. you can check adil khan's name in the following categories..

http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adil_Khan

Kategorier: Norske realitydeltakere | Norske dansere | Norsk-pakistanere | Fødsler i 1983 | Norske skuespillere

English translation of the above text: cateogories: Norwegian Reality programme participants, Norwegian daancers, Norwegian-pakistanies ( norwegian of pakistani origin), born in 1983, Norwegian actors

You have to create an article first, click on Adil Khan and type in the content you want. You can sort out the categories after there is an article. you would use category:Norwegian actors and category:1983 births Category:Norwegians of Pakistani descent Category:Norwegian dancers. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Adil Khan

reasoning -Thathaal (talk) 12:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

dear sir, I have created an article about Adil Khan, this needs to be imporoved with all the refferances etc, I tried to add a refferance about adil khan receiving an award and tried to reffer to this page http://skolenettet.no/templates/News.aspx?id=41158&scope=Scope8-10&epslanguage=EN&simple=true , but i did not make it, moreover i have problem to add his name in categories like norwegian actors, norwegian dancers etc, can you please explain to me how to do that, MOREOVER, there is a threat hanging that " This article has been tagged for deletion.", please can you remove that, because it took me sometime to write that..thanks in advance.

The page is not currently deleted, nor is it tagged for deletion, so there's nothing for us to do here. Looks like you've managed to figure out some of your editing issues -- for the future, you might want to read some of the links in the welcome message on your talk page. They will probably answer a good number of your questions. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Scott Erickson (musician)

several citations have been added -Mcbryde626 (talk) 22:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done article is not deleted, please talk to the tagger, or discuss on the article talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Brett Clouser

There has been some recent debate on the AfD for other Survivor contestants; these can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin "Coach" Wade and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyson Apostol. Clearly, Brett Clouser was a better article than these (and he was more notable than Tyson Apostol). Please review the deletion and restore the well-written article. -—Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 23:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Since this was deleted by way of a discussion, the community has decided not to have such an article. However you can request a review at WP:DRV. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Jagadguru_Kripaluji_Maharaj

This person is a renowned personality in India. provides spiritual satisfaction to many. he is an exponent of Hindu Religion.Lareg amount of public good is done through hospitals and discourses. visit www.jkp.org -Ballym (talk) 02:24, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done The article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagadguru Kripalu Ji Maharaj. If you believe that the discussion was not correctly closed according to consensus, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

smile radio

this is for a community radio station which is due to go live imminently, not a commercial venture which is why I believe it was deleted in the first place. Other community radio stations have pages and I do not want to have to recreate it -Longtimecoming (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done The article was deleted, not because it was thought to be a commercial station, but because it gave no indication of meeting Wikipedia's notability requirement. I have restored a copy to your user space at User:Longtimecoming/Smile Radio, where you can work on it if you think you can demonstrate notability, but before moving it back to the main article space, please check with user Orangemike (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted it. JohnCD (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Adil khan

dear sir yesterday, i used many hours to create this article, it took so lonf time because this was my first article, I also uploaded an image of Adil Khan from a website, not sure about the copy right, can someone please delete that photo, it is here where i got the message about deletion. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thathaal&redirect=no

the article about adil Khan is a not polished yet, i would use more time to make it better. there is also a notice about " Proposed deletion of Adil Khan" which goes like this

"The article Adil Khan has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ALI nom nom 12:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)" what is missing in this article or what can I do so this article is not deleted.

hope for a positive reply. Thanks in advance -Thathaal (talk) 14:59, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Once again, Adil Khan is not deleted, nor is it currently proposed for deletion. You already removed the prod tag yourself[1], and then added some references[2], which took care of the issue.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
I have deleted the image as requested. JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

We Are The In Crowd

The article was originally deleted as a non-notable band.This band is signed to a reputable record label. They are currently on a national tour and will be playing to hundreds of thousands of people over the next few months. The band has been covered by major press outlets (Alternative Press Magazine & Substream), their music is for sale on iTunes and Amazon, and they have music that has been placed on MTV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.193.226 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 27 April 2010

 Not done. The article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Are The In Crowd. It was then repeatedly re-created, so that the title has been protected against creation. If, after reading WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (music), you think you can create an acceptable article, you would do best to make a draft in your user-space, and then approach admin Shimeru (talk · contribs) who closed the discussion or admin Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs), who protected the title, to see whether they agree that your article is suitable. If not, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. To make a user-space draft, you will need to be a logged-in user: when you start to edit, the next page after the one with "You may create the page" has a box of advice at the top. The fifth bullet-point, starting "You can also start your new article... ", gives a link which will open a user sub-page for you. JohnCD (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

War of Ideas

The reason I am requesting that the page "War of Ideas" be restore is that it is a re-emerging tool of statecraft and international relations. It was used successfully in the West during the Cold War and once again being employed by the United States in their effort against terrorist. The article was deleted because someone felt that "War of Idea" was a "Common English Term." -Friedrich Dusseldorf (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done The article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War of Ideas. The reason was more complex than you suggest, and was based on Wikipedia's policy of publishing WP:No original research. If you believe that the discussion was not correctly closed according to consensus, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Azlan Othman

There is a site here. -Starkiller88 (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done the article is not presently deleted, although it will be if reliable, independent sources are not added to the article. The subject's blog is not an independent source, and anyway is already linked from the article. Thryduulf (talk) 20:36, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Ponnala Lakshmaiah

reasoning -Naresh Babu. K 04:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


Dear sir/ Madam,

Do not delete this article. This article is about an Indian politician belongs to andhra pradesh state. his portfolio is State cabinet minister for " Major and Medium Irrigation".

We will add relavative resources, reference at the earliest.

thanking you, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thgrp (talk • contribs) 04:48, 28 April 2010

The article has not been deleted, but before 7 May you must add references from reliable sources to confirm what it says. JohnCD (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Alan Gustafson

Highly Successful NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Crew Chief. Have had requests for it. -66.193.219.100 (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. The article was deleted as a copyright violation and cannot be restored. You must write it in your own words; but first, read WP:Your first article, WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people) to be sure you can write an article that meets Wikipedia's requirements. JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

scott seaman-digby

I wish to have this article undeleted because it had many references to large sites. I did not make a copy of the latest text that I had updated and would love to make the necessary amendments to comply with wikipedia. Scott Seaman-Digby is a candidate standing in Hayes and Harlington and it would be great for people to see who he is before voting -Ojwilliams8 (talk) 21:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. After much debate on how to handle articles about political candidates, which were formerly deleted unless they had notability apart from being a candidate, it was agreed (see WP:POLITICIAN) that they should be replaced by redirects to the constituency article, and that decision was implemented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Seaman-Digby. If Mr Seaman-Digby is elected, then he can have an article. You can still get access to your text by clicking on the name, which will take you to the constituency article. Just below the top of that, it will say "redirected from Scott Seaman-Digby". Click on that, and you will be taken to the article, now a redirect. The "history" tab will give you access to previous versions of the article; but you should not reinstate it unless he is elected. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Timothy A. Wilkinson

MSgt Wilkinson isn't some random solider from the 1993 Battle of Mogadishu. He is a Air Force Cross recipient, the second highest decoration a service member in the USAF can receive. If you take his article down you might as well take every AF Cross, Navy Cross, and Distinguished Service Cross recipient down. If the reasoning was well he is only famous for that battle Shughart and Gordon's article also should be deleted.-Feickus (talk) 23:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norm Hooten. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Xymmax (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Dolores Del Monte

Every playmate deserves to have an article. They may not meet the porn critera, but that's because they aren't porn in the first place. They are an American Icon and part of history itself. -142.167.167.9 (talk) 21:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done. As the article was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, it is automatically restored on request. I will notify user NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the WP:Articles for deletion process - there is some debate about whether just being a Playmate is enough for notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Jackie Rainbow

All playmates deserve to have an article. They may not qualify as porn but they shouldn't have to. They are american pop culture icons and a part of history. -142.167.167.9 (talk) 21:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done. As the article was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, it is automatically restored on request. I will notify user NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the WP:Articles for deletion process - there is some debate about whether just being a Playmate is enough for notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Simply Hired

Reasoning for deletion appears to be over-reaching and was possibly part of a malicious request for deletion by a competitor. Page is relevant due to the company's broad online presence as a metasearch engine for job postings and partnership with LinkedIn and others. -Superhilac (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

The only reference in the deletion log is: 21:46, 31 March 2010 JzG (talk | contribs) deleted "Simply Hired" ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: User:Bburgart is almost certainly Bonnie Burgart, marketing associate at Simply Hired. Most edits are COI or spam. Article lacks credible sourcing.)

It can also be seen that this user made deletion requests to at least 2 other similar companies, both of which still have valid Wikipedia pages.

  1. 21:52, 31 March 2010 (diff | hist) Employment website ‎ (rm. laundry list)
  2. 21:49, 31 March 2010 (diff | hist) Buddingup ‎ (rm. deleted and questionable) (top)
  3. 21:47, 31 March 2010 (diff | hist) Indeed.com ‎ (→See also: rm. deleted)

The time is in line with these requests.

Please also see discussion on Indeed.com in reference to articles for deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Indeed.com

These companies are all competitors and it appears that there was most likely a malicious request to remove them all. Some were apparently successful, as in the case of Simply Hired, while others not, as in the case of Indeed.com and Buddingup. This purge appears to be unjustified and inconsistent.

☒N Not done Requests for Undeletion is for relatively simple, uncontroversial requests. This request may require further discussion, therefore, please contact the administrator who speedy deleted the article, JzG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review Thanks. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

information strategist

Unreasonable time limit on delete. Article was inwork and not complete. Correcting issues and developing further. -GeoBub (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 10:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

EHCP

I have nothing to do with EHCP other than the fact that I use the software and it has opened many doors for me. I see now that Wikipedia is not the neutral information community I once thought it was. Your unjust actions in relation to deleting this article tells me Wikipedia is influenced by commercial agendas, and not freedom of information. It is quite obvious that arguments made against this article were in part by commercial competitors with an agenda. How much exactly did Plesk "donate" to influence this deletion decision? I must say, thank you Wikipedia for giving me something to write about on crookedamerica.com -WiZZiK (talk) 13:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

As I responded directly above, you are seeking a more in-depth review of the close of the deletion discussion by Arbitrarily0 (talk · contribs). The place for that is deletion review. There the discussion will stay open for seven days and you will get opinions from a number of editors. Requests for undeletion is for simple, uncontroversial requests. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Orlando Attractions Magazine

It is a notable publication available in book stores across the country -68.202.244.115 (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear

My firm's page has been deleted while in the process of building a page for a law firm. It is clearly for historical reference only and not as an advertising tool. We are not super familiar with this, as we are still new, and would like to understand why this page has been deleted and furthermore, how we can post a better, wiki-friendly page without further deletion or banishment. Furthermore, many other law firms post on wikipedia and we were simply trying to set up the very same format for Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear.

We were deleted by Snowolf, so we attempted to contact him but to no avail. We need to understand how to create a page similar to others that are already posted on Wikipedia and we would like to hear back from either Snowolf or a more active IT support who could help guide us through this process.

We want to follow all guidelines and rules, as we absolutely do not want to advertise to readers, offend wikipedia's administration or be banished from this community. We look forward to your response. For reference, please review our previous message to Snowolf below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bothwellmarketing/Sandbox

Snowolf: thank you for your review of this page. We are not power users of Wikipedia - maybe you can help.

Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear is a prominent Intellectual Property Law firm - they have been involved in protecting many biotech and information technology innovations. They told us that many law firms have their own Wikipedia page noting historical milestones and achievements. We checked and found that to be the case: Orrick Herrington, Latham & Watkins, O'Melveny, etc etc etc. We assumed that notable law firms were therefore accepted as being a valuable part of Wikipedia reference information. We thought we could author something similar for Knobbe - we have never done a Wikipedia page before, but we know a lot about law firms - - so we thought we could probably do a reasonable draft. We have not completed this - we also thought we were in a "development sandbox" and we would not be reviewed until the content was finished. I think it is unfortunate if this important firm is blocked from being listed because the name of our firm has the word "marketing" in it. We are not trying to advertise the firm - we just think they have made valuable contributions and earned a place.

Maybe you can advise us of why other firms were not blocked and this firm is - and what we can do to solve this. If this is merely an issue about our own firm name: Bothwell Marketing - we can certainly have another person/company submit a listing. In the meantime we really would like to have this listing "unblocked" so we can continue to work on it.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.11.80.89 (talk • contribs)

I wish to clarify that nobody can "have their own Wikipedia page": articles in Wikipedia are not "owned" by anybody but Wikipedia itself. If there are articles about these firms, I would like to presume in a spirit of assuming good faith that they were created by some impartial third party who found them both of interest and notable. We do not need or want the creation of articles about firms by the firms themselves, nor by their agents, employees or shareholders, for reasons both of partiality and conflict of interest. If non-notable firms have snuck themselves in, in violation of our rules and principles, then such articles can be nominated for deletion by you or anybody else; but we do not put much stock in what is known hereabouts as the "there's other articles out there which are just as bad as mine" argument. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Coincidentally, I was the one who requested deletion of the Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear page, so I can give you some good clues about why it was deleted.
The page was most recently deleted in 2008, and at the time it consisted solely of {{law-firm-stub}}, thus qualifying for speedy deletion under A3, since it had no substantial content.
The previous version, deleted in 2007, read exactly like a press release, as did the extremely similar sandbox version deleted by Snowolf. Given that you are a marketing firm, that's not surprising. You might take a minute to read through WP:COI (since I assume the law firm hired you) and WP:SPAM. Then let the law firm know that Wikipedia is not the place to "submit listings" in order to promote themselves. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Brooks Brown

Besides being an important witness to the Columbine High School Massacre (he was both a classmate and friend of Dylan Klebold, one of the shooters, and an on again/off again friend of the other shooter, Eric Harris, Brown is also an author of a book ("No Easy Answers: The Truth Behind Death at Columbine") and a web designer for a well-known company, LucasArts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elementally (talk • contribs) 03:22, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks Brown (2nd nomination). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

XiRCON

It was quite a popular IRC client back in its day. It has relevance. -Davygrvy (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XiRCON. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tone (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Note that a userfied version of the page currently exists at User:Tothwolf/XiRCON. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed

For me to improve it more, and if there is a need to reconstruct the whole article, I am willing to spend more time for it once again. It was nominated by Editor Jeff G for which the article does not satisfies the Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. Then, it was deleted by Editor Stifle, deleted 29 April 2010 | 09:51. -Turki Faisal Al Rasheed 19:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Stifle (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

1st Brigade Illinois Volunteers

I presented facts and open material of the original organization and provide a clear rundown of event leading up to the creation of that organization. Nothing I wrote or took from historical facts is copyright infringments. If so then point the mistakes out and they will be corrected. This just deleting material without due course of fixing is just plain wrong. After all the crap people have posted on your sites and allowed how can my page be equal to those? Thank you and I would like to have an explaination why my page was wrong. headquarters1bn@aol.com -Dellingerdavid (talk) 21:43, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the article seemed to be a copyright violation of https://sites.google.com/site/1stbrigadeil/, no? Consider asking UninvitedCompany (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, for his/her input as well. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Steve Sexton Composer

have added a number of reliable sources. Initially had no reliable sources or links, hopefully i have done it properly (Thanks)-Stvsxtn (talk) 03:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the article is not currently deleted (nor tagged for deletion). Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Kickn Kenny V

Dont understand why, but Kenny is all over the web, from old school flyers to other events. Please look his info over and resubmit him to your page, someone must not have liked him being up here. For someone to say that his history was untraceable, is just not right! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.49.186 (talk • contribs)

I can't find a deleted article for Kickn Kenny V, Kickn kenny v, Kickin Kenny V , or any of several other variations. Without the exact title we can't really help you.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 Done - turns out the article was located at Kickin' Kenny V, and so has been restored on request as a proposed deletion. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Also note that the article has been nominated for a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kickin' Kenny V. Best regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Ta. Hadn't seen any usage with an apostrophe in my gsearch, so I didn't think of that variation.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
:) No problem - the only reason I even found it was because deletionpedia tipped me off. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Ric McIver

Ric McIver is a prominent local politician in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Calgary is a major metropolitan centre in Canada, the 4th largest by population. Furthermore, he is a significant candidate for mayor of the city in the upcoming October 2010 elections. Please note that other current Calgary aldermen, including Joe Ceci, André Chabot, and Diane Colley-Urquhart have articles that have not been deleted, and as of May 1st 2010, none of the above have indicated they are participating in the mayoral election. I strongly request undeletion of the page, as it has strong significance in the area of Canadian politics. --Dbo789 (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Dbo789/Ric McIver. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting Nihonjoe (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Zaon Flight Systems, Inc

research for Masters thesis re: use of solid state directional antennas -Gregv1971 (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the article was deleted as "unambiguous advertising or promotion" and so can't be restored. If you would like, a copy of the article may be emailed to you - just contact me if you would like me to do this. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Rebekah Davis

Rebekah Davis is the Democratic candidate for the US House of Representatives, Nebraska's 3rd District 2010 election. If she wins it will be an upset, the first Democrat to win in today's 3rd district of Nebraska. She has a grassroots campaign with many speaking engagements and is being covered by all local media outlets including Fox News. She is an "important and notable politician" by virtue of the fact that she is currently running and running in a district that came close to a party upset only in 1974 and 2006. -Timi361 (talk) 14:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

The article was redirected to Nebraska's 3rd congressional district as she fails WP:POLITICIAN. If she wins then she will satisfy that criterion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Gary Johnson (producer)

Gary Johnson is a British Record Producer and remixer responsible for writing, producing and remixing dozens of records over two decades. He also composes material for television broadcast worldwide. There are several references that could be cited though in the past I had not linked his Discogs entry to this Wikipedia entry since it is woefully inadequate. -68.8.207.30 (talk) 21:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

National Union of Greek Australian Students

The article was an accurate reflection of the history and current status of the Union -124.190.241.63 (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Union of Greek Australian Students. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Shimeru (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Thryduulf (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Gasland

newly revised, neutral in point of view, topic of timely interest -Healthy Planet (talk) 02:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done page is not deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

User:WCityMike

I'm wondering if an administrator might be able to unearth an old iteration of my userpage from a 2006 self-requested deletion. I remember an earlier iteration of my userpage, back when I was more active as an editor, being in a form I liked and having a collection of links I found very useful at the time; I'd like to have that as a starting draft to work from. My guess is that the undeletion to undo probably is the deletion made by Tawker when looking at this log. — WCityMike 08:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and if this does prove possible, if you need to overwrite what's there in order to do it, go ahead; if not; if you can restore it to something like User:WCityMike/OldFrontPage or what have you, that'd be great. — WCityMike 08:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 Done history from june to 4 July 2006 restored, there are other deleted versions too that come from earlier or later, and these too could be added back into history, so please say if you want this. It may reveal details you wanted to leave deleted, (such as age and location and relative) or vandalism. Ask if you want this version back too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

User:WCityMike (Transcluded/Dependencies)

Wonder if you might be kind enough to restore these as well -- they appear to be transcluded into one of the final results I'm seeking to duplicate. — WCityMike 11:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done JohnCD (talk) 11:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Can't believe I transcluded stuff this deep -- *embarrassed look* -- can you help these two? — WCityMike 11:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done the first one - there's no record of the second, are you sure you've spelled it right? JohnCD (talk) 11:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, you're right. It should be:
User:WCityMike/CoolWikiStuff · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

possibly also:

... (if any other numbers exist) ...

I'm sorry, evidently the setup I had four years ago had lots of dependencies. Color me significantly embarrassed for causing people the hassle. — WCityMike 11:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done all of those that exist. JohnCD (talk) 11:57, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you so much! My guess is that's probably it. — WCityMike 11:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

CommLab India

I was not notified that the page was tagged for speedy deletion, would it be possible to move the text of the page to my userspace User:Captain-n00dle/Commlab_India so that I can improve it? -Captain n00dle\Talk 12:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done JohnCD (talk) 13:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Brilliant, thank you John ^_^ Captain n00dle\Talk 13:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Joan Gregor

I have found 2 articles relating Joan Gregor's connection to LA Design Challenge and 1 to Her company The Design Academy, Inc, co founded with Charles Pelly. Article was originally deleted because of lack of references. -AlexSchultz (talk) 18:39, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The article has not been deleted. The BLP-PROD template on it only said that, as an unsourced biography of a living person, it would be deleted after ten days unless sources were supplied. As you have added sources, you could simply have removed the PROD template, as both the PROD itself and the notice on your talk page explained. I have done it for you. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

ElderTreks

Not sure why it was deleted. I have a bunch of charity information related where this business has been donating and building homes in Asia and Africa for poor families in need.

Like a bunch of other Adventure Travel companies, this page used to be listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Travel_and_holiday_companies -Special:Contributions/Gerry toronto (talk) 18:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Classixx

I am a member of the group classixx. An intern from the company that manages us created this page as per my request. It was just a start and we planned to add more and more info to it.

We are a music production duo that has released a number of notable remixes and singles through both major labels and prominent independent labels. our discogrpaghy can be found here: http://www.discogs.com/artist/Classixx We are also prominent dj's in our native Los Angeles and along with our contemporaries, we have help start a developing scene of indie electronic dance music here. As djs we have toured extensively both in the U.S. and internationally, playing shows on every continent (excluding Antarctica). Here is a link to view fliers from many of the concerts we have played: http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewPicture&friendID=279982599&albumId=544711

We are still actively touring internationally as you can see by going to our official myspace page: http://www.myspace.com/classixxmusic

This is the Classixx official website: classixx.la There is contact information on the site or you can send a message to the myspace if it is need to confirm my identity.

let me know what else I can do to make sure this page is safe from being deleted. our email address is classixx@classixx.la —Preceding unsigned comment added by Classixx (talk • contribs)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Note that a deletion discussion has been opened for this page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classixx. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_8&oldid=1138664708"